http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
A Systematic Review of Audiology Terminology
오수희,이정학 대한청각학회 2016 Journal of Audiology & Otology Vol.20 No.2
The present report provides an overview of terminology studies in audiology including topics and study characteristics, as well as categorizing the main issues. The goals are to improve the understanding of the current issues for terminology in audiology and to provide some basic information that will be useful to develop an international standard. Search procedures were completed over two phases. Phase 1 included a systematic electronic searches using MEDLINE (PubMed), Excerpta Medica Database, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, and International Organization for Standardization with keywords related to terminology of audiology. The studies were initially identified according to the titles of 2921 publications following careful abstract examination. Of these, whole texts of 16 publications were retrieved. Five papers met the inclusion criteria were further investigated. In phase 2, a manual search was conducted to collect additional publications with keywords related to terminology project in audiology. A total of 16 papers were found. The essential terminology issues classified included ‘appropriateness,’ ‘classification/ framework,’ ‘inconsistency of terminology,’ ‘multilingual and international aspects,’ and ‘service quality/delivery including communication and accessibility.’ This was indicative of the paucity of terminology research in audiology, despite recurring terminology issues. Establishment of standardized terminology in audiology may minimize current challenging terminology issues by improving appropriateness and consistency of terminology as well as communication among relevant stakeholders at national and international levels.
인공와우를 통한 말지각과 반대편 귀 사용 효과에 대한 최근 연구 고찰
오수희,김진숙 한국청각언어재활학회 2014 Audiology and Speech Research Vol.10 No.2
The goal of cochlear implants restores functional hearing by transmitting electrical pulses to auditory nerves and improves speech perception. Although current cochlear implant users showed greatly improved sentence recognition scores in a quiet environment, the issues of understanding speech in a noisy environment and listening to music are still challenging for them. Limitations of spectral and temporal resolution are thought to be related to these difficulties of cochlear implant users. As one of the approaches to resolve these challenging issues, benefits from the contralateral device of cochlear implant users were introduced. Two different types of binaural placements, bilateral and bimodal hearing, were continuously increased and they demonstrated some amounts of speech perception benefits. Bilateral hearing improves sound localization and speech perception in noise mostly due to the benefits from head shadow and redundancy effects. On the other hand, bimodal benefits are delivered by using acoustic low frequency information which is not represented in electric stimulation via cochlear implants. A review of the literature related to these topics was addressed.
한국어판 성격적응척도(K-JPAQ:Korean Joines Personality Adaptation Questionnaire)의 신뢰도 및 타당도 연구
오수희,허만세,이영태 한국교류분석상담학회 2018 교류분석상담연구 Vol.8 No.2
The purpose of the present study was to examine the reliability and validity of the Korean version of Joines Personality Adaptation Questionnaire(K-JPAQ). Data were collected from 1,445 Korean adults while Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory(MMPI) was additionally administered to 150 subjects only. Eight clinical experts were interviewed to examine a content validity of the K-JPAQ. Data were analyzed using a variety of statistical methods including a correlation analysis, a Cronbach alpha analysis, and a principal component analysis. In general, most clinical experts agreed that the items of the K-JPAQ were well constructed and translated for assessing the six personality adaptations in Korea. Cronbach's alpha was .790 for all the items of the K-JPAQ. The six personality adaptations was significantly correlated with their MMPI counterparts. Six factors were extracted using principal component analysis, which was consistent with the six personality adaptations originally established by Joines and Stewart (2002). Overall, these results indicate that the K-JPAQ is reliable and valid for Korean adults. Thus, K-JPAQ could be utilized as a reliable and valid tool for clinicians and researchers in Korea. 본 연구의 목적은 Vann Joines(1986)가 성격적응을 측정하기 위해 개발한 성격적응 척도(JPAQ: Joines Personality Adaptation Questionnaire)를 국내에서 사용할 수 있도록 한국어 판 성격적응 척도(Korean Version of Joines Personality Adaptation Questionnaire; K-JPAQ)의 신뢰도와 타당도를 검정하는 것이었다. 본 연구는 1,445명을 대상으로 설문조사를 실시하였으며 전체 연구 대상자 중 150명을 선별하여 MMPI 검사를 실시하였다. 수집된 자료에 대해 다양한 분석을 실시하였는데, JPAQ 척도의 내용 타당도를 검정하기 위해 8명의 국내 심리상담 분야의 전문가들의 의견을 수렴하였고, JPAQ 척도와 MMPI 와의 상관관계 분석으로 준거타당도를 확인하였으며, JPAQ 척도의 요인구조를 파악하여 척도 개발자가 제시하고 있는 요인구조와 비교하였고, 끝으로 JPAQ 척도 전체와 하위요인별 내적일치도를 분석하였다. 본 연구의 주된 결과는 다음과 같다. 첫째, JPAQ 척도 전체와 하위요인들의 Cronbach' ɑ는 척도 전체가 .790으로 비교적 높은 신뢰성이 파악되었으며 하위요인들은 .510 이상의 신뢰도가 확인되었다. 둘째, JPAQ 척도는 전문가들에 의해 내담자들의 성격적응에 대한 구체적인 질문으로 구성되어 있는 것으로 확인되었는데 내용적합성 판단 결과가 평균 3.5로 상당히 높게 나타났다. 셋째, JPAQ 척도의 하위요인들과 MMPI 임상척도들 간에 상관관계가 있는 것으로 나타나 일정 정도 준거타당도가 확보되었다. 마지막으로 JPAQ 척도에 대한 요인분석 결과 척도 개발자가 제시하고 있는 것과 마찬가지로 생존 및 실행적인 성격적응이 각각 3개의 요인으로 구성되는 것으로 나타났다. 이러한 연구 결과를 바탕으로 연구의 의의와 한계 및 후속 연구를 위한 제언을 하였다.
The Gaps between Knowing and Doing in Hearing Aid Fitting Management
오수희,이경원,이정학 대한청각학회 2017 Journal of Audiology & Otology Vol.21 No.2
Evidence based practice has become an important aspect in many healthcare provisions toimprove patient outcomes. Investigating the gaps between knowing and doing in audiologypractice will provide future directions for successful service delivery. The purpose of thisstudy was to explore “know-do” gaps related to professional awareness and attitude inhearing aid fitting management (HAFM) by analyzing data of a questionnaire. It consisted of22 questions focusing on 11 HAFM components. Each component had two sub-questionsinvolving levels of the importance and practice for HAFM. Respondents answered eachquestion based on subjective judgments for their own hearing aid fitting services with aVisual Analogue Scale. A total of 51 responses from hearing care professionals were collectedand the scores for knowing and doing were compared. The results showed overallhigh scores in doing and knowing responses; however, there were significant “know-do”gaps demonstrating higher knowing scores than doing scores across all HAFM components. The largest “know-do” gaps were observed in three components mostly implementedduring follow-up sessions which indicate the need to improve their corresponding servicesand practical guidelines emphasizing the follow-up services.