생산물책임의 비교법적 고찰 - 한국 , 일본 , 중국의 법제를 (法制) 중심으로 -

연기영 ( Kee Young Yeun ) 한독법률학회 1988 한독법학 Vol.- No.7

퍼블리시티권의 침해와 손해배상의 과제

연기영 ( Kee Young Yeun ) 한양대학교 법학연구소 2014 법학논총 Vol.31 No.1

Publicity right has been started to be accepted as a new property right in the United States since 20th century. However, this publicity right, unlike other traditional property rights, possesses some certain limitations in bringing an order to its legal characteristics and subjecting relevant legal principals to cases. Even in the United States, the origin of Publicity Right, each state forms different definition of this right in the process of enactment or setting a precedent. In South Korea, there is a huge rise of the industrial value of cultural contents in the international market resulting from ‘the Korean wave’ in the sports entertainment area, which causes the growth in conflicts about the violation of publicity rights. Therefore, it is an urgent need to prepare the legal protection against these kinds of conflicts. In this research, compensation system will be examined as a legal aid method for the violation of the publicity right. For this kind of discussion, the history and the concept of the publicity right, object of protection target, and breach type had first been determined and proposed the task of de lege ferenda. Recently in Korea, there had been some remarks, claiming legalization after the legislation bill on the right of publicity had been submitted to the National Assembly. Cases where celebrities` names, portraits, etc, are used on advertisement or publicity without permission, happen frequently happen and the financial damage of the celebrities are considerable. In addition, in neighboring Asian nation, Korean stars` photograph collections are being sold without the permission of the holder of a right, so the right of publicity should be legalized and protect the financial value of the celebrities. The need of the legislation had been recognized; however, discussion on the transferability and the range of inheritance of the right of publicity or the decision to locate the legislation does not yet seem mature.

한류의 확산과 한국문화산업관계법의 과제

연기영(Yeun, Kee Young),김창규(토론자) 한양법학회 2007 漢陽法學 Vol.21 No.-

The “Hallyu” also known as the Korean Wave is regional, and it is spread in Europe area across the Asian whole area, and even a genre side begins in a drama, public music, and a movie, a game, a character are the course scattered in the culture contents whole. However, it is rapidly increased to be accompanied with the damage example by the Korean Renaissance. Particularly, intellectual property rights infringement of culture contents and the infringement of the publicity zone of the entertainment industry reach one serious standard and a degree may never come off a reproduction and the misappropriation that are it-like illegally of the culture article because of satellite broadcasting rapidly’s best spread of Internet and a new medium. In this paper, I would like to show problems of the spreading of the Korean Wave and sign of the anti-Korean Wave, Korean state policy and Problems of the Korean Culture Industry-related Law.

일본의 의료정보법제와 개인정보보호

연기영(Kee Young Yeun) 중앙법학회 2005 中央法學 Vol.7 No.4

법학교수에 대한 변호사자격부여에 관한 연구

연기영(Kee Young Yeun) 중앙법학회 2005 中央法學 Vol.7 No.1

製造物責任紛爭을 위한 ADR(재판외 분쟁처리)제도의 활성화 방안

延基榮(Yeun, Kee-Young) 중앙대학교 법학연구원 2008 法學論文集 Vol.32 No.2

Strict products liability is liability in tort for harm caused by defective products without any necessity for the plaintff to show fault on the part of the defendant. The American Greenmann v. Yuba Power case is of major importance in the development of Srict Liability doctrine for the defective product. After this case, most American jurisdictions have adopted the verson of strict tort liability contained in section 402A of the Restatement (Second) of Torts which was first drawn up by the American Law Institute in 1965. Propsals for a European Community Diretive on Products liability were first considered in the 1970s and after slow progress, finally led to the adoption by the Member States of the present Directive in 1985. The Directive provides in its first article that 'producer shall be liable for damage caused by a defect in his product'. This Directive was the first significant attempt to achieve the harmonisation of an area of private law at Community level. Now, All Member States of EU have adopted legislation incorporating the Directive into their national legal systems. Jananese Product Liability Act 1994 and Korean Product Liability Act 1999 have adoped the strict liability doctrine as well as EC Directive 85/374 and the American Restatement of Tort 1965. For the resolution of products liability cases, many countries use ADR system. Especially with the introduction of strict liability, many dispute resolution centers in the field of product liability have been set up and begun opertions in Japan. ADR has the potential of being guick and less expensive in the procedural phase. ADR is easily accessible to the parties and removes various impediments in access to legal remidies. In Japan, there are two types of ADR organizations for Products Liability. One is that of the national Consumer Center and local Consumer Centers, which deal with product complaints, the other is that of the Product Liability Centers that take care of extended damages and harm caused by defective products. Many Producers tend to think that such compromise is not un reasonable for maintaining their reputation and goodwill, partly because the monetary amount in dispute with consumers is often very small. PL centers can be appreciated as an attempt to build a structure that enables the fair resolution of disputes, based on law and facts, by providing a new and scientifically natural service for investigating the cause. Finally, in this paper I would like to introduce a new ADR system focusing on the Japanese organizations for the products liability disputes(PL centers and Cause Investigating Organizations).

스포츠법의 현황과 과제 : 스포츠사고에 대한 법적 대응과 스포츠기본법의 제정을 중심으로

연기영 법과사회이론연구회 2000 법과 사회 Vol.19 No.1

학교스포츠 활성화를 위한 법적 과제

연기영 東國大學校 比較法文化硏究所 2002 比較法硏究 Vol.3 No.-

이상을 통하여 학교스포츠의 보호, 육성을 위한 법적 과제를 살펴보았다. 앞으로 주5일 근무제의 확립에 따라 근로환경이 변화되고 여가활용을 위한 스포츠활동이 보다 활성화 될 것으로 보인다. 이러한 미래사회에 도전하기 위해서는 국민체육의 근간인 학교체육의 중요성은 쉽게 인식할 수 있다. 그러나 아직도 생활스포츠나 프로스포츠에 비해 학교스포츠에 대한 국가적 관심과 지원은 미흡한 실정이다. 국가와 지방자치단체는 학교스포츠 활성화를 위한 스포츠활동공간의 확충과 충실한 체육교과운영을 위한 재정지원에 좀더 적극적인 대책을 강구해야 한다. 이러한 국가정책을 뒷받침할 수 있는 법제의 정비도 시급한 실정이다. 가칭 <학교스포츠진흥법> 또는 <스포츠 육성․교육에 관한 법률> 의 제정을 고려할 필요가 있다. 또한 학교스포츠사고에 대한 사전 안전대책과 사후 구제대책에 관한 법리의 확립, 각급 학교의 체육특기자의 선발과 관리문제, 학교시설의 특수성에 따른 학교 스포츠시설의 이용관계, 학교스포츠사고의 특수성, 학교로고의 사용과 지적재산권의 문제 등과 관련된 법률문제가 특수한 학교스포츠법에서 해결되어야 할 과제이다.

스포츠선수계약의 문제점과 과제

연기영 東國大學校 比較法文化硏究所 2008 比較法硏究 Vol.9 No.1

Generally the Player's exclusive contracts are the contracts that are signed by the entertainers with the theatrical company, broadcasting station and the production company. Unlike the some famous celebrities most of the players have to sign in the contract with enterprise, even with the fact that the principle of "free contract" is not applied due to the unbalance of the status. The details of these contracts are ruled by the regulation law. These exclusive contracts are producing the actual business relations in various ways and are created in complicated forms in employment, undertaking, and commissions etc. But unlike those famous celebrities who has the private office to reach the direct contract, rest of the entertainers have to sign in the exclusive contracts and as the fact that these situation are based on the entertainer's labour, it is reasonable that these contracts can be categorized as the unfixed contracts. Players' Contract is conducted when a player agrees with the KBO Rules, the Uniform Players' Contract. The Uniform Players' Contract holds the statutes and agreements which form the legal source of baseball league. Therefore, I examined whether the terms of the Uniform Players' Contract is incorporated with the player's contract. The examination forced this study to analyze the contract that because it was established with the exclusion of the players. Therefore, the concern in this study is to find out the attributes of unfairness of the contract in the aspect of players' benefit. For the protection of player's right, the provision of terms should be inserted in the regulation of the Uniform Players' Contract. Unlike the some famous celebrities most of the players have to sign in the contract with enterprise, therefore the these contracts should be controlled by the labor law. Respecting the player's rights, the new legislation should be proposed since the various forms of these exclusive contracts, can not be handled by the current labor law.

生産的 福祉政策과 社會福祉法制의 課題

延基榮 東國大學校 比較法文化硏究所 2001 比較法硏究 Vol.2 No.-

生産的 福祉란 社會全體 시스템이 生産的으로 바꾸어야 한다는 前提에서 출발한 槪念이다. 舊民法에서 출발한 傳統的인 施惠的 福祉와 區別되는 개념이다. 스스로의 能力을 開發하여 자립할 수 있도록 지원하는 福祉政策이며, 中産層育成과 庶民生活을 목표로 하는 人間開發中心의 生産的 福祉라고 할 수 있다. 生産的 福祉란 유럽을 비롯한 여러 先進國家의 社會保障政策의 問題點을 克服하기 위해 政策的으로 제시된 ‘제3의 길’과 비교될 수 있다. 生産的 福祉의 比較法的인 연구를 통하여 先進 福祉國家의 成功과 失敗를 분석해 내는 작업이 선행되어야 할 것이다. 우리나라에 적합한 生産的 福祉시스템을 정립해 나가는 작업을 위하여 社會保障制度의 개혁이 이루어져야 할 것이다. 社會保障의 法政策的 측면에서는 효율적인 社會安全網을 갖춘 새로운 福祉패러다임을 개발할 필요가 있다. 특히 個人들의 勤勞意慾을 減退시키지 않는 福祉政策을 통하여 競爭力을 提高하고 雇傭을 增大시키며, 效率的인 福祉政策을 펼쳐 나갈 수 있는 代案이 제시되어야 할 것이다. 이 論文에서는 生産的 福祉政策의 理念을 구현하기 위한 法政策的 課題를 槪括的으로 제시하였다.