RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      검색결과 좁혀 보기

      선택해제

      오늘 본 자료

      • 오늘 본 자료가 없습니다.
      더보기
      • 무료
      • 기관 내 무료
      • 유료
      • New Global History and the Challenge of Subaltern Studies ― Plea for a Global History from Below

        앙겔리카 에플레 부산대학교 한국민족문화연구소 2010 로컬리티 인문학 Vol.0 No.3

        This article links together two conflicting approaches within the European andUS-American academic discipline of history: New Global History and SubalternStudies. New Global History aims to overcome Eurocentrism by focusing on thehistory of “Spaceship Earth” (Bruce Mazlish) instead of national histories. Byconfronting this suggestion with the criticism of the Subaltern Studies Group—mainly from Dipesh Chakrabarty and Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak—the articleshows the profound but hidden influence of Western historical thinking on NewGlobal History. It becomes obvious that New Global History has not succeeded inovercoming Eurocentrism due to its concentration on anonymous global structuresand its failure to include individual experiences. The Subaltern Studies’ approach tohistory, on the other hand, fails to grasp global structures. The article concludes witha plea for a “global history from below”. This global history from below ties in withthe challenge of Subaltern Studies and applies their criticism to global history. Whathistorians have to do is show how the local is formed globally and, at the same time,how the global is put together locally. The article assumes that this is only possiblewhen the historian discloses the “centrism” of his or her narration by making itexplicit—be it a “centrism” focusing on Europe, Asia, or whatever region in theworld.

      연관 검색어 추천

      이 검색어로 많이 본 자료

      활용도 높은 자료

      해외이동버튼