RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      검색결과 좁혀 보기

      선택해제

      오늘 본 자료

      • 오늘 본 자료가 없습니다.
      더보기
      • 무료
      • 기관 내 무료
      • 유료
      • KCI등재

        주시거리에 따른 우세안 방향의 변화 및 단안 편위량의 비교

        심준범(Jun-Beom Shim),현석(Hyun-Suk Shim) 한국안광학회 2020 한국안광학회지 Vol.25 No.1

        Purpose: This study was conducted to determine the changes in the dominant eye and compare the single-eye inset amounts depending on the view distance. Methods: The direction changes in the dominant eye and single-eye inset amounts were measured as the view distance was changed to 200 cm, 50 cm, 40 cm, and 33 cm in the direction of the dominant eye in 64 adults with no underlying disease (mean age: 23.59 ± 3.73 years; 35 men, 29 women). Results: As a result, 59.5% of the right dominant eyes and 77.8% of the left dominant eyes showed varying direction changes in the dominant eye depending on the view distance (r = 0.583). Dominant eyes were found to show greater changes according to the viewing distance than those shown by non-dominant eyes. Differences in the single-eye inset amounts caused by changes in viewing distance showed a greater inset amount in the right direction than in the left direction at all viewing distances regardless of the direction of the dominant eye. Conclusions: Since the direction of the dominant eye may vary depending on the viewing distance and the single-eye inset amount differs, it is recommended to determine the direction of the dominant eye and single-eye inset amount after conducting a dominant eye test at the target distance to be corrected.

      • KCI등재

        안경사의 사회적 역할과 지원방안에 대한 연구

        현석(Hyun-Suk Shim),심준범(Jun-Beom Shim),서재명(Jae-Myung Seo),김상현(Sang-Hyun Kim) 한국안광학회 2020 한국안광학회지 Vol.25 No.3

        Purpose: In this study, we examined laws related to Korean optometrist and studied the contradictions between laws and solutions. Methods: We identified and examined laws directly and indirectly related to Korean optometrist. The contradictions in these laws and the social role of Korean optometrist were redefined, and the differences between the medical technician and Korean optometrist, and existing papers and reports related to Korean optometrist were reviewed. Results: The law on the support of the health care workforce has made it clear that Korean optometrist are health care workers, and as health and medical services personnel, Korean optometrist are currently working to improve eye health services. However, the interpretation of laws related to Korean optometrist is not clear. In other words, Korean optometrist do not need a doctors guidance, but they play the same role as medical technicians. They are not pharmacists, but they are dispensing, fitting, and selling sight correction ophthalmic devices on the doctors prescription. Korean optometrists are disadvantaged by the interpretation of the law that is not clear. To eliminate these disadvantages, a clear legal interpretation is needed, and the definition of Korean optometrist should include clear sentences related to refraction tests. Conclusions: It is time to clearly interpret the laws related to Korean optometrist who are playing a role as health care workers and to seek a support plan for Korean optometrist.

      • KCI등재

        Von Graefe법에서 우세안과 비우세안의 원·근거리 사위도 비교

        김재식(Jae-Sig Kim),심준범(Jun-Beom Shim) 한국안광학회 2018 한국안광학회지 Vol.23 No.2

        Purpose: This study amis to compare amount of phoria at distance and near in dominant eye and non-dominant eye by Von Graefe Method. Methods: Sixty-six adults (male:31, female:35) with a average age of 24.18 without underlying disease participated in this study. Dominant eyes were determined by Hole in the card test. Amount of phoria at distance and near were measured by Von Graefe method, after setting prism on a dominant eye and non-dominant eye. Results: In the right dominant eye, exophoria values were 0.56 ~ 1.23 Δ higher at distance and near and there was significant (p = 0.001, p = 0.009) when the measurement prism was set on a dominant eye. In the left dominant eye, there was more distance exophoria, when the measurement prism was set on non-dominant eye. in the near, when the measurement prism was set on a dominant eye. Degree of Esophoria was higher, but there was no significant difference between the two groups (p = 0.210, p = 0.962). The average of the phoria degree in dominant eye and non-dominant eye was significant (p = 0.001) that the mean of the right dominant eye was 2.65 ~ 2.77 Δ higher than the left dominant eye in distance Phoria. The mean of the right dominant eye was 4.15 ~ 4.32 Δ higher in exophoria direction in near distance and it was significant (p = 0.002). Conculsions: In phoria test by Von Graefe method, the right dominant eye was higher amount of phoria than the left dominant eye in exophoria.

      연관 검색어 추천

      이 검색어로 많이 본 자료

      활용도 높은 자료

      해외이동버튼