우리나라 만성신부전 환자 중 혈액투석 이용 환자수 예측에 관한 연구

신영수,김용익,이상일,윤성철,조인호 대한신장학회 1988 Kidney Research and Clinical Practice Vol.7 No.2

Hemodialysis is becoming an estabilished way of treating chronic renal failured patients in our country. But this treatment modality requires lifelong maintenance. So that its high cost exerts significant impact upon medical finance and therefore the prediction of incidence rate and treatment number should be important. This study was carried out by use of the patient fiow model consisting of conservative treatment group, kidney transplantation group, hemodialysis group, peritoneal dialysis group, dead group, and drop-out group and simple linear regression analysis in order to provide basic data for the management of chronic renal failured patients. Expected numbers of annual hemodialysis patients during 1986-1990 were estimated to be 982, 1133, 1364, 1662, and 1889 each year. Further refinement of the model and its parameter was required for improving the accuracy of estimation.

특집 _ 개정 신탁법의 실무상 쟁점 : 부동산신탁의 쟁점

신영수,윤소연 서울대학교 금융법센터 2013 BFL Vol.62 No.-

경제입법에 있어서 ‘규제일몰’ 관련 쟁점과 과제– 유료방송 합산규제 일몰의 경험을 중심으로 –

신영수 한국경제법학회 2018 경제법연구 Vol.17 No.3

규제일몰제는 국민의 권리를 제한하거나 의무를 부과하는 규제에 대해 그 존속의 시한을 미리 정해 놓은 입법이나 규정을 의미한다. 일몰이 적용되는 규제는 연장이나 존속에 관한 특별한 필요성이 인정되지 않는 한 정해진 기한의 도래시에 자동 폐지되는 것을 원칙으로 한다. 하지만 현실적으로는 규제가 연장되는 사례가 적지 않게 나타나고 있다. 규제는 생명체와도 같아서 일단 부여받은 생명력을 쉽게 포기하지 않기 때문이다. 우리나라의 경우는 주지하다시피 지난 1998년 행정규제기본법 개정을 통해 이 제도가 도입된 이래 논쟁의 소재가 되어 왔다. 최근 유료방송 합산규제 일몰과정에서도 확인되었듯이 일몰시점 도래 시에는 규제 도입시의 갈등과 대립이 재현될 가능성이 크며 그에 따라 상당한 사회적 합의 비용을 유발할 수 있다. 등록규제의 수는 해마다 증가하고 있고 일몰 등을 통해 소멸하는 규제의 수는 소수에 불과하다. 오히려 경제 환경이 변화하였음에도 기존의 규제는 소멸하지 않은 채 신규 규제만 지속적으로 증가하고 있다. 이 같은 현상은 신기술이 출현하게 되어 경제 환경이 급변하게 될 4차 산업혁명에 더욱 두드러질 것으로 예상된다. 이 점에서 규제일몰제의 의미와 본질, 그리고 타당한 활용방안을 살펴볼 필요가 있다. 이 논문에서는 규제일몰에 관한 일반적 검토를 분석한 후, 최근 유료방송 합산규제 과정에서 부각된 해석상의 쟁점들과 향후 제도 개선을 위한 몇 가지 방안을 제시하였다. Regulatory sunset means a legislation or regulation that sets a deadline for the existence of a restriction on the rights or duties of the people. Therefore, it is the principle that it is automatically abolished when the specified time comes, unless the special necessity of extension or continuation of the regulation is recognized. However, regulation is like living thing, and not only does not give up easily the vitality once granted, but also has the characteristic to try to expand to the adjacent legal areas. In Korea, since introduction of the regulatory sunset system through the amendment of the Basic Administrative Regulation Act in 1998, it has been the subject of academic controversy. In the case of the sunset, it is highly likely that conflicts and confrontations will be reproduced like at the time of introduction of the regulation, and it may lead to considerable social settlement costs. In fact, the number of regulatory regimes is increasing every year, and the number of registrations that are extinguished through the sunset is only a few. Although the economic environment has changed, the existing regulations have not ceased but new regulations are continuously increasing. This phenomenon is expected to become even more prominent in the fourth industrial revolution, where new technologies will emerge. It is expected that the new technology will emerge and the economic environment of the citizens will become a new aspect. Thus, it is necessary to examine the significance and essence of the regulatory sunset system, and the proper utilization plan. In that respect, this paper analyzes some legal interpretation issues regarding regulatory sunset and suggests ways to improve the system in the future, after analyzing the general review on regulatory sunset.

국내외 심.판결 사례 해설 및 평석 - 카르텔의 성립요건으로서 행위주체 복수성의 의미

신영수,Sin, Yeong-Su 한국공정경쟁연합회 2009 경쟁저널 Vol.- No.145

금융기관의 합병심사에 있어서 공정거래위원회의 역할(II)

신영수 한국공정경쟁연합회 2003 경쟁저널 Vol.- No.99

집단배척행위와 당연위법의 원칙-Craftsmen Limousine, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co.사건-

신영수 한국공정경쟁연합회 2004 경쟁저널 Vol.- No.110

공정거래법상 입찰담합규제 활성화 방안에 관한 고찰 -건설시장을 중심으로-

신영수 한국상사법학회 2008 商事法硏究 Vol.27 No.1

As the new government launches, the role of the Korean Fair Trade Commission(herein after ‘KFTC’) as the regulatory agency on large conglomerates is forecasted to be rapidly diminished. Inherent function of the KFTC as the competition authority on the other hand is expected to be getting more emphasized. In this transforming circumstances, the regulations on cartel, especially on ‘bid-rigging’ seems to be one of core area on which the KFTC would concentrate its enforcement capacity. Bid-rigging is the representative sort of naked cartel under the competition law, but, as for the KFTC, regulating it has been a very difficult work to catch and eradicate. Particularly in the korean construction market, so it is, in that bid-riggings have been arising from various complicated reasons. First of all, construction companies protest that the korean market faces oversupply due to recent deregulation on the market, so bid-rigging should be understood as a inevitable response in order to survive. Another important cause is current construction policies and systems which are inclined to induce the anticompetitive agreement around bidders. Especially regarding the latter aspect, unilateral legislative or practical improvement of the current construction institutions for the purpose of removing the cartel inducing factors is not only uneasy to propel but also indesirable considering complex regulatory factors such as safety and quality of construction. In this context, this article attempted to some institutional suggestion to activate the regulation on bid-rigging mainly with the antitrust angle. For that purpose, it made on analysis of anticompetitive practices and environments in the korean construction market, and reviewed legitimacy and limitation of the current legal system. Upon this basis of examination on the recent regulatory reformation against bid-rigging in U.S. and Japan, it suggested overall directions and several concrete ideas for early perception and effective restraints of bid-rigging. As the new government launches, the role of the Korean Fair Trade Commission(herein after ‘KFTC’) as the regulatory agency on large conglomerates is forecasted to be rapidly diminished. Inherent function of the KFTC as the competition authority on the other hand is expected to be getting more emphasized. In this transforming circumstances, the regulations on cartel, especially on ‘bid-rigging’ seems to be one of core area on which the KFTC would concentrate its enforcement capacity. Bid-rigging is the representative sort of naked cartel under the competition law, but, as for the KFTC, regulating it has been a very difficult work to catch and eradicate. Particularly in the korean construction market, so it is, in that bid-riggings have been arising from various complicated reasons. First of all, construction companies protest that the korean market faces oversupply due to recent deregulation on the market, so bid-rigging should be understood as a inevitable response in order to survive. Another important cause is current construction policies and systems which are inclined to induce the anticompetitive agreement around bidders. Especially regarding the latter aspect, unilateral legislative or practical improvement of the current construction institutions for the purpose of removing the cartel inducing factors is not only uneasy to propel but also indesirable considering complex regulatory factors such as safety and quality of construction. In this context, this article attempted to some institutional suggestion to activate the regulation on bid-rigging mainly with the antitrust angle. For that purpose, it made on analysis of anticompetitive practices and environments in the korean construction market, and reviewed legitimacy and limitation of the current legal system. Upon this basis of examination on the recent regulatory reformation against bid-rigging in U.S. and Japan, it suggested overall directions and several concrete ideas for early perception and effective restraints of bid-rigging.

금융기관의 합병심사에 있어서 공정거래위원회의 역할(I)

신영수 한국공정경쟁연합회 2003 경쟁저널 Vol.- No.98

중소기업 및 영세상공인 관련 가격규제의 영향에 관한 법/정책적 평가: 시론적 연구

신영수,오정일 경북대학교 법학연구원 2022 법학논고 Vol.- No.76

In this study 1,600 price regulations under current statutes and administrative rules were identified through statutory data from the National Statutory Information Center provided by the Ministry of Legislation. Based on this, the types of price regulations were divided into three categories: direct, indirect, and procedural price regulations, and regulations that could affect the business activities of small and medium enterprises were extracted to assess their legal legitimacy and economic feasibility. It also proposed measures to enhance the adequacy of price regulations for small and medium enterprises under current legislation. In Korea this study confirmed that in addition to the upper and lower limit regulations on prices itself, there are many regulations on indirect factors, pricing processes, and payment methods that can affect prices. In addition, there are many regulations that are recognized for their utility through evaluation of the legitimacy, clarity, cost and benefit of regulations, but there are many regulations that require abolition or easing in the medium and long term. 이 연구는 현행 법령상의 가격규제 가운데 중소기업 및 영세상공인을 대상으로 한 규제 실태를 정리하고, 이들 규제가 당초 정책 목적에 부합하는 효과를 발생시키는지, 중소기업 등 경제적 약자들의 자유로운 시장 진입을 가로막거나 수익 기반을 저해하고 경쟁력을 저하시키는 부작용을 유발하는지를 평가하는데 주안점을 두었다. 본 연구에서는 법제처가 제공하는 국가법령정보센터의 법령 데이터를 통해 현행 법령 및 행정규칙 상 가격, 수수료, 요금, 보상금, 입장료, 최저임금, 보증금, 수업료, 이용료, 관람료, 통행료, 이익금, 요율 등의 명칭으로 행해지는 1,600여개의 가격규제의 소재와 내용을 파악하였다. 이를 토대로 가격규제 유형을 직접적 가격규제, 간접적 가격규제, 절차적 가격규제의 세 유형으로 나누는 한편, 중소기업이나 영세상공인의 사업 활동에 영향을 미칠 수 있는 규제들을 추출하여 법리적 정당성과 경제적 타당성을 평가하였다. 또한 현행법 상 중소기업 등에 대한 가격규제의 적정성 제고 방안도 제시하였다. 우리나라의 경우 가격 자체에 대한 상・하한선 규제 외에 가격에 영향을 미칠 수 있는 간접요인이나 가격결정 과정, 납부 방법에 대한 규제가 다수 시행되고 있음이 본 연구를 통해 확인되었다. 또한 규제의 정당성, 명료성, 비용 및 편익 등에 대한 평가를 통해 그 효용이 인정되는 규제가 다수이지만 중・장기적 측면에서 폐지나 완화가 필요한 규제도 적지 않다. 이러한 규제에 대해서는 관련 기관과의 정책적 협의를 통해 제도 개선을 모색해야 한다. 향후 연구과제로서 가격규제의 정의 및 유형 분류에 대한 재검토가 필요하다. 규제의 적정성, 폐지 또는 완화 필요성을 검토하기 위해서는 그 대상을 엄밀하게 정의해야 한다.

심.판결 사례 해설 및 평석-호주의 은행합병 규제와 경쟁법 집행

신영수,Sin, Yeong-Su 한국공정경쟁연합회 2007 경쟁저널 Vol.- No.133