한국어의 어순 변이 경향과 그 요인에 대한 연구

신서인 국어학회 2007 국어학 Vol.0 No.50

This paper presents the results of an analysis on word order variations in Korean using an annotated Korean corpus. It is found that basic word orders are dominantly found in the sentences. One of the factors which decide the extent of the word order variations is obligatoriness. It is found that ‘NP-ro’ occurs in front of a predicate when it is an argument in an argument structure of the predicate, while its position is flexible when ‘NP-ro’ is an adjunct. Another factor is a thematic role. According to the thematic role, one word order is preferred: a ‘Theme’ precedes a ‘Final State’, while a ‘Instrument’ does not affect the position of the preceding ‘Theme’ or the following ‘Theme’. The factors which cause word order variation is found in information structures: left-movement represent topicalization and right-movement represent focalization.

말뭉치를 이용한 한국어 문형 및 어휘 연구의 현황과 과제

신서인 한국어학회 2019 한국어학 Vol.83 No.-

The purpose of this paper is to examine the trend in the research of Korean sentence patterns and lexical items using corpora, and to explore the future directions in the field. The use of corpora was started from linguistic research such as dictionary compilation, Korean language education and natural language processing, but their application is also expanded to theoretical studies of Korea linguistics. The review of previous research on sentence patterns using corpus methods has shown that we need to expand a syntactically annotated corpus and construct a corpus with thematic role annotations. At the same time we need to discuss the range of predicates which determine sentence patterns. Until now, the majority of studies of lexical items using a corpus have taken a corpus-based approach. A corpus-driven approach, which is yet to be fully explored in Korean linguistics, will prove fruitful in bringing in new perspectives on studying the meaning of lexical items.

의미는 어떻게 수치화될 수 있는가?-언어의 선조성과 구조성을 반영한 언어 모델의 개발을 위하여-

신서인 한국어의미학회 2023 한국어 의미학 Vol.82 No.-

The purpose of this paper is to introduce various attempts to quantify meaning, review their significance, and then find ways to supplement methods to quantify meaning. Until now, meaning has been quantified based on the word frequency in the document and the word frequency of search words and their collocates. The former is a method that does not consider the order of appearance of words, and the latter considers only adjacent words. To elaborate the quantification of meaning, efforts are needed to reduce the importance of relationships between adjacent but syntactically unrelated words and to pay attention to relationships between distant but syntactically related words. If meaning is quantified in this way, vectorization of words or sentences can become more sophisticated, and based on this, more efficient language models can be developed.

한국어 의미역 기술 모형 개선을 위한 연구 - Korean PropBank 프레임파일의 구조 개선을 중심으로 -

신서인 한국어의미학회 2020 한국어 의미학 Vol.70 No.-

The purpose of this paper is to analyze the structure of the Korean PropBank framefiles and suggest several ways to improve it. In the paper, we discuss the features and limitations of the Korean PropBank framefiles and propose an alternative model for semantic role description. In terms of macro structure, the Korean PropBank framefiles have a peculiar structure. The lemma representing several words becomes the entry, and the related vocabulary is described in one file. Therefore, the lemma setting criteria and related vocabulary processing criteria should be clearly established, and homonyms should be processed in a consistent way. In terms of micro structure, there is no place in the Korean PropBank framefiles to describe postposition(josa) information, which is essential for Korean semantic role labeling. Therefore, this lack has to be supplemented. In describing the sematic role information, it is more useful to describe it as a label-type sematic role rather than as a number-type sematic role or a narrative-type sematic role. In the Korean PropBank framefiles, arguments and adjuncts are analyzed in different ways in the analysis of example sentence, but they need to be analyzed parallelly. In order to take care of the suggestions for improvement, we propose an alternative model for Korean semantic role description. This new model will be able to describe information that is useful for a more effective analysis of Korean semantic role.

結果狀態 意味役에 대한 연구

신서인 한국어문교육연구회 2007 어문연구(語文硏究) Vol.35 No.2

A Study on the Thematic Role ‘Final State’ Shin, Seo-in This paper argues the necessity of thematic role ‘final state' and illustrates the cases of ‘final state'. The verbs which need an argument ‘NP-(eu)ro' are divided into two groups: the verbs meaning ‘movement (change of place)' and the verbs meaning ‘change(change of state)'. The result of ‘movement' is interpreted as ‘goal' and the result of ‘change' is interpreted as ‘final state'. The sentences which represent ‘change' are syntactically and semantically distinct from that of ‘movement': the word order of the noun phrases is rather fixed, the noun phrase which represent ‘final state' can not be relativized, and the entailment of the sentence is identification. The meaning ‘change' has two kinds of sub-meaning: physical change(the change of the object itself) and mental change(the change in the sense of recognition). Physical change can be subdivided into the change of character, position, and quantity; mental change can be subdivided into the change of sense and perception, judgement and evaluation, guess, division and classification, decision, and treatment. 本稿는 ‘結果狀態final state’라는 意味役 設定의 타당성을 검토하고 ‘結果狀態’로 記述할 수 있는 구체적인 例를 類型別로 提示하는 것을 目的으로 하였다. ‘NP-(으)로’ 成分을 要求하는 動詞는 크게 移動을 나타내는 동사와 變化를 나타내는 동사로 나눌 수 있다. 前者와 後者는 그 差異가 있는데, 動詞가 變化를 나타내는 경우 ‘NP-(으)로’ 成分은 語順이 자유롭지 않고, 관계화되지 않는 등 移動을 나타내는 경우와 區分되는 특징을 보였다. 이러한 이유로 동사가 移動을 나타내는 경우는 ‘NP-(으)로’를 到達點으로, 동사가 變化를 나타내는 경우는 ‘NP-(으)로’를 結果狀態로 解釋하는 것이 타당함을 확인하였다. 變化를 나타내는 경우는 크게 對象 自體의 變化와 認識上의 變化로 구분할 수 있었다. 前者의 경우는 屬性 變化, 地位 變化, 數量 變化 등으로 세분되며, 後者의 경우는 感覺知覺, 判斷評價, 推測, 區分統合, 決定, 取扱 등으로 세분된다.

네트워크 분석을 이용한 복지 담화 연구

신서인 한림대학교 한림과학원 2017 개념과 소통 Vol.0 No.20

본고는 네트워크 분석방법을 이용하여 복지 담화의 변화양상을 분석하는 것을목적으로 한다. 1992년부터 2012년에 이르기까지 5년 단위로 대통령 선거가 치러지기 직전 한 달 동안의 신문기사 중 ‘복지’를 포함한 기사를 수집하고 네트워크 분석을 이용하여 복지 담화에 등장한 단어들의 관계를 파악하였다. 복지 담화는 20여 년에 걸쳐 일정한 변화양상을 보였다. 첫째, 노인·장애인 복지에서 여성·아동 복지로 주로 논의되는 복지대상의 변화가 감지되었다. 둘째, 복지가 경제성장 및 일자리와 관련하여 논의되게 되었다. 본고에서는 네트워크 분석방법의 의의와 한계를 밝히는 데에도 힘을 기울였다. 네트워크 분석은 단어 간 관계를 시각화하여 보여 주며 검색어와 공기어의 관계뿐 아니라 공기어 사이의 관계를 보여 준다는 점에서 유용한 면이 있었다. 그러나 코퍼스언어학에서 발달해 있는 다른 연구방법들, 즉 키워드 분석·연어 분석·클러스터 분석·용례 분석 등과 비교할 때 맥락에 대한 고려가 상대적으로 적고, 해당 단어의 전체적인 분포에 대한 고려가 적다는 것이 한계로 드러났다. 코퍼스언어학의 연구방법과 네트워크 분석방법을 결합한다면 대규모 코퍼스를 대상으로 한 담화 분석을 효율적으로 수행할 수 있을 것이다. This paper examines changes in the welfare discourse, using network analysis. Newspaper articles containing the word bokji (welfare) were collected which had been published during the presidential election held every five years between 1992 and 2012. Analysis of related words shows two ways in which the welfare discourse was changing over this 20 year period. Firstly, there is a shift in the main beneficiaries of welfare from the disabled and the elderly to women and children. Secondly, there is a increasing tendency for the issue of welfare to be discussed in relation to economic growth and jobs. The paper also demonstrates the strengths and weaknesses of network analysis when applied to discourse analysis. Thus,network analysis is useful in revealing connections between the search word and its collocates, but also shows linkages between the collocates, through visualization. In comparison with other well-established methods of analysis in corpus linguistics, however, such as keyword, collocate, cluster, and concordance analyses, the major limitation of network analysis is that it provides relatively little information about the context in which a given word is used nor about its overall distribution. Nevertheless, it is likely that in the future, combining traditional corpus analysis methods with network analysis will boost the efficiency of discourse analysis, especially when using large corpuses.

한국어 의미역 말뭉치 구축을 위한 의미역 표지 연구

신서인 한국어의미학회 2019 한국어 의미학 Vol.66 No.-

The purpose of this paper is to discuss what should be considered in the process of establishment of the semantic role label set and semantic role annotation for a semantic role annotated Korean corpus. This paper first compares the semantic role label lists of dictionaries or corpora that are built on a large scale, and examines the status of the semantic role annotation, and examines the issues related to the semantic role annotation of arguments. Accordingly, semantic role labels for adjunct are proposed. For the practical purposes, such as the establishment of an automatic response system, it would be advisable to use the same semantic role set to identify the agreement between the two sentences, but the current paper proposes the semantic role annotation suitable for expressing the relationship between the predicate and the arguments in a sentence. Decisions on how to solve the semantic annotation problems of Korean sentences should be made before a balanced list of semantic role label sets and clear work instructions can be drawn up.

동사 "생각하다"의 문형에 대한 고찰

신서인 서울대학교 국어국문학과 2009 冠嶽語文硏究 Vol.34 No.-

문장부사의 위치에 대한 고찰

신서인 국어학회 2011 국어학 Vol.61 No.-

This paper examines the unmarked word order of sentences with sentence adverbs, and analyses what the sentences with sentence adverbs mean when they appear in marked word order. The unmarked position of a sentence adverb that modifies a whole sentence is at the sentence initial position. If a sentence with a sentence adverb has marked word order, it is not because the sentence adverb is positioned in different places, but because other constituents are placed before the sentence adverb. The constituents that come before sentence adverbs are those which are topicalized.

어순 변이와 문장 의미 해석

신서인 한국어의미학회 2009 한국어 의미학 Vol.28 No.-

Shin Seo-in. 2009. Word Order Variation and Analyzing Sentence Meaning. Korean Semantics, 28. This paper has looked over various approaches to word order variation in Korean. Language typological approach shows generalized insight on basic word order; but it is not enough for word order variation in individual sentences. In syntactic approach, word order information of lexicon interact with other kinds of information such as case-marker or selectional restriction. In pragmatic approach, topic and focus, main concepts of a theory of information structure offer useful explanation for marked order. In some cases, scrambling is occurred for successful communication.