RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      검색결과 좁혀 보기

      선택해제

      오늘 본 자료

      • 오늘 본 자료가 없습니다.
      더보기
      • 무료
      • 기관 내 무료
      • 유료
      • KCI등재

        식민사관의 확대재생산과 한국 언론

        손석춘(Seokchoon Sohn) 역사비평사 2014 역사비평 Vol.- No.109

        The core logic in colonialist historiography is stasis and heteronomy. The resignation of the journalist Chang Geuk Mun who was nominated for Prime Minister, provides an opportunity to introspectively examine the impact of colonialist historiography. This incident appears to show that journalists and academics in Korea were trapped within the frame of colonialist historiography. Colonialist historiography in Korean journalism should not be considered as transient or a thing of the past because it can influence not only the events of today but the future of Korean society by expanding and reproducing colonialist historiography in quantitative and qualitative ways. Analysis of this process shows that it still provides a mechanism for maintaining and strengthening vested interests of political-economic power, and the knowledge power of journalists and academics in universities. This is the reason why Korean academia must take the lead and open this perception to widespread public discussion. People should be made aware that mainstream Korean journalism is biased by colonialist historiography. If this is not done it will be very difficult to get rid of the entrenched framework of heteronomy in the present and future divided Korea.

      연관 검색어 추천

      이 검색어로 많이 본 자료

      활용도 높은 자료

      해외이동버튼