http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
소순열(Soh Soon Yeol) 한국지역사회학회 2010 지역사회연구 Vol.18 No.2
This study has investigated how citizen-government partnerships were established for the development of local communities and have Intensified the power of citizens, examining the two cases which were activated by citizen participation. These cases are summed up as follows. (1) Community development with residents' participation is a model in which residents in a particular community reach an agreement on discovering and resolving problems with administrators and experts, establish development plans, participate in the process and take responsibility of the outcomes. In this process, residents' participation finally enables them: to complement representative politics; to secure policy-making and policy-implementing capacity and legitimacy; mediate and comprise conflicts of interest to protect the rights of the minorities and increase the understanding; to establish desirable plans and execute administration; and to realize the plans and reinforce the residents' responsibility in the future management of the community. (2) If we classify the types of citizen-government partnerships in the process of local governments' administration into the two criteria for financial allotment and service supply, citizen-government partnerships in current local areas are on the way to go from government initiative (Ⅰ) to citizen-government cooperative (Ⅲ). (3) We have compared the campaign of new rural village development programs and projects with prime village businesses as the leading cases of types of rural communities development with residents' input and participation. Then, both were fitted to suitability of businesses, the former was superior to the latter in the aspect of business efficiency. The latter was relatively superior to the former in the aspect of businesses. Specifically, the latter, prime village businesses, have been reinforcing the capacity of local residents with consulting, education, citizen-government partnerships. (4) If we formulate plans for reinforcing the capacity of residents in the future in those two cases, they are ① to scout and cultivate leaders, ② to develop and generalize residents' participating programs, ③ to substantially expand education and discipline, ④ to form local agricultural networks and build partnerships, and ⑤ to support administratively and financially.
소순열 ( Soon Yeol Soh ),이소영 ( So Young Lee ) 전북대학교 농업과학기술연구소 2012 농업생명과학연구 Vol.43 No.2
The objective of this study is to review the meaning of food cluster and to suggest a role of Jeonbuk in the formation and operation of a Korean National Food Cluster. Until now the process of formation a Korean National Food Cluster features are as follows: it is being formed government-led, focus on R&D, export-oriented, external expansion. National food cluster in order to be a success in Jeonbuk, some strategies needs to be established. There are programs of linkage between regional agriculture and food industry, development plan of linkage between regional industry and food Industry, regional network system creating, strategies of human resource development and strengthening the capacity.
1920-30년대 농민운동의 성격 변화 : 전북지역을 중심으로
소순열(Soh Soon-Yeol) 한국지역사회학회 2007 지역사회연구 Vol.15 No.2
This study examines the basis for causes of the peasant movement in 1920s-1930s, how and why the characteristics of the disputes between the landowners and the tenant farmers changed, and what these changes mean to what extent. Entering 1920s, the disputes between landowners and tenant farmers was boosted into anti-Japan peasant movement and in 1930s it was further turned into the struggles against landowners. More specifically, it turned from political and economic demand to economic demand (change in demand), from collective disputes to noncollective, individual disputes (change in dispute behaviors), from complement to legal and illegal struggles to complete devotion to legal struggles (change in struggle strategy), and government's authorities' direct intervention after the disputes and institutional suppression by brute force to open mediation before and after the disputes (change in the government-general's countermeasures). Such changes are basically caused by colonial authority's conciliation and suppression. The colonial authority had to mediate the contradiction towards the direction where landownders and the tenant farmers are absorbed into the system in order for the imperialism to maintain and reinforce its system. It appeared as suppression at one time and as institutional, government-made movement at another. As a result, contradiction inherent in people and in class slowed, the disputes subdued in a way of being absorbed into its own system, and the campaign for liberation of the oppressed people retreated. Amid these changes, the tenant farmers that have been transferred into the product economy were faced with forward-looking immiseration and started making their demand to the landownders for economic improvement. They didn't accept the farm rent as given. Instead, they became aware that higher production capacity lead to higher production cost and to levying additional farm rent and finally to economic difficulty and they started the disputes.