溫泉의 私權性 保障論

소성규(So Sung-Kyu) 한국부동산법학회 2003 不動産法學 Vol.8 No.-

For the public welfare, the law over hot spring water is regulated for the purpose of developing hot springs efficiently and for the proper protection of them. According to the emphasis on the purpose of the contribution of the public welfare, the rigid enforcement of the administrative regulation has been increased. As a result, the enforcement brought a phenomenon neglecting a private life. Therefore, there have been some phenomena that the local dwellers of the area that has been developing a spa do not like the development rather than welcome it. The reason why the inhabitants do not like the development of a spa is that after making decision on a zone for the developing a spa, the land will have the rigid regulations of the government on using and utilizing the land. Furthermore, the value of land is decreasing also. In the other hand, a spa development can bring the excessive utilization of underground water that causes the lack of agricultural water and the contamination of the ground water. The owners of spas also have the same kinds of dissatisfactions with dwellers. The owners speak out their dissatisfactions that the current doctrines and the judicial precedents are denying a private right of ownership of a spa, and there is no clear legislation over the issue so that they could not mortgage their land for a capital. Even though the value of the land is considerably high, the value can not be acknowledged. The auction process also has the same situation openly. Therefore, to appraise a right over spar zone properly, people have raised an objection to disregarding a right over a spa ownership as a real right at the viewpoint of the customary law. This study has been started from the idea of admitting the ownership of a hot spring as the real right in the term of the customary law rather than issuing the problems, which have no alternatives, because there have been some public trades definitely in Korea since long time ago, even though there were not that much cases. In sum, the study suggests a plan that admits the ownership of a hot spa as a real right, and that guarantees the private right of spa, differentiating the current rigid administrative regulation. Main contents of this study are as follows. Ⅰ. Introduction Ⅱ. Comparative research studies on hot water Ⅲ. Theories and cases on the issue of the private right security of hot water Ⅳ. The lawful relationship on the private right security Ⅴ. Methodologies on the private right security Ⅵ. Conclusion

집합건물 관리에 관한 특별법 제정방향

소성규(So, Sung-Kyu) 한양법학회 2014 漢陽法學 Vol.25 No.3

Aggregate buildings are ubiquitous in Korea. Accordingly, regulations were established in both public and private laws to ensure efficient management. Housing Act, Rental Housing Act, and Building Act are examples of such public laws while Civil Act (Article 215) and the Act on the Ownership and Management of Aggregate Building, a special civil law, (abbreviated as Aggregate Building Act), are current private laws in the legal system. Housing Act was enacted to promote housing stability and standards in Korea. It establishes when and how to supply funds for necessary housing construction and its management. (see Housing Act Article 1). To attain this purpose, certain regulations in Housing Act allow a principal agent to supply and manage houses simultaneously. However, in Aggregate Building Act, regulations are written in a sectional owner"s perspective. Clearly, management regulations in both public and private laws overlap and create confusion. A holistic aggregate building management is, therefore, required but as of yet the system is still behind the times. One may think that both regulations are needed because they are different in their legal substances; one deals it in the standpoint of a principal agent while the other focuses on the viewpoint of a divided ownership. However, critics, in view of aggregate building management, contest that legal regulation should not be different in this same management case. Hence, this paper discusses on this raised jurisdictional problem. To solve this legislative problem properly, this study defines legal concepts and terms of aggregate building management. Aggregate building is a general concept and thus apartment houses and shopping center, in this sense, are the types of aggregate building. Furthermore, to provide legislative measures for a special act on aggregate building management, case studies in Japan whose legal structure in terms of Housing Act is very similar to Korea, are used in this dissertation. From this, the research includes institutional implementation measures to unify legal system of aggregate buildings management. Moreover, it contends to legislate the Special Act on Aggregate Building Management (tentatively named) to eliminate legal overlaps between private laws and public laws. Not only this, it suggests to establish the administration committee such as Aggregate Building Management Support Center (tentatively named) that is exclusively responsible for the administrative issues. The aggregate building management problem must be studied further. Since legal disputes inevitably arise even in a community with efficient management, establishing effective dispute settlement can be a first step. In addition, "Sell First, Build After" policy must be re-investigated and legal studies on responsibilities of a constructer and a person who parcels should be conducted to prevent further conflicts.

이혼가정 미성년자녀의 양육적정화를 위한 법정책적 연구

소성규 ( Sung Kyu So ),허태갑 ( Tai Kap Hur ) 한국법정책학회 2013 법과 정책연구 Vol.13 No.3

이혼가정이 늘어나면서 미성년 자녀의 복리에 관한 문제는 단순히 미성년자녀의 부모의 문제가 아니라 사회적 문제로 대두되었다. 이혼이라는 당사자간의 계약의 해소의 법적측면과 더불어 미성년자의 양육문제가 가족법의 중요한 과제가 되었다. 2007년 민법 개정의 주요한 법 개정 목적이 부부가 이혼 시 최우선 고려해야 할 사항으로 미성년 자녀의 복리에 관한 문제라고 규정하고 있다는 점은 이를 잘 반영하는 것이라고 할 것이다. 이처럼 이혼에 있어 미성년자녀의 처리문제에 대한 사회적 인식은 높아지고 있으나 현실적 상황은 법적 인식조차 따라 오지 못하고 있다. 미성년자에 대한 양육은 미성년자가 인간으로서 살아갈 수 있도록 기본적 생존권을 보장해야 한다는 것 뿐만 아니라 사회의 구성원으로서 자랄 수 있도록 교육받고 독립적 경제능력을 갖출 수 있도록 배려되어야 한다는 점을 의미한다. 이혼가정에서 미성년자녀의 양육문제를 단순히 이혼시 발생한 채권의 이행확보문제로 접근한다면 이혼가정내 미성년자녀가 합리적 사회구성원으로 성장하는가에 중점을 두기보다는 국가가 미성년자녀의 양육책임을 이혼한 부모에서 귀속시키고 책임을 면책하려하는 것이다. 따라서 본 연구에서는 이혼가정을 위한 양육제도를 미성년자녀의 복리와 사회화라는 목적에서 적정화하고 효율화할 수 있는 방안을 찾고자 하였다. 근래 이혼 후 미성년자녀의 양육을 보장하기 위해 양육비지급과 관련한 문제가 제기되었지만 양육비지급보장만으로 이혼 가정의 미성년자녀 양육이 보장될 수 있다는 사고는 아이들에게 의식주라는 생존적 배려만 해주면 된다는 비인간적 사고가 내재되어 있다. 선진국의 경우 이혼은 배우자관계의 종결만 의미할 뿐 부모관계의 종결을 의미하는 것이 아니므로 공동양육이라는 제도를 도입하여 부모 모두와의 적절한 관계를 유지하도록 하고 있다. 양육비와 관련하여서도 지급강제과 실현되기까지 생존의 배려가 불가능하다는 점에서 국가에 의한 사전지급과 사후추심제도를 고려할 필요가 있다. 또한 양육비지급이후 양육비사용의 적절성을 확보하기 위하여 양육비사용에 대한 확인요구를 인정하여야 하고 비도덕적 양육자변경을 위한 합리적 절차개선이 필요하다. 이러한 업무수행을 법원이 모두 행하는 것이 현실적으로 불가능하므로 종합적인 양육보조기관을 설치할 필요가 있다고 본다. As the number of divorced families increased, the problem of welfare of the minors has resurfaced as not merely a parental problem but a social issue. Divorce, in legal terms of marriage contract annulation and parenting of the minors have become an important task of family law. This well reflects the main purpose of revised civil law in 2007, which prioritizes the welfare for the underage when one gets divorced. The social recognition of processing problems of children is growing but the status quo does not even come along with legal recognition. Nurturing the minors means not only guaranteeing their basic rights to live as human-beings, but also caring their education and economic ability as they could become an independent member of a society. Approaching this problem of child upbringing of divorce simply on division of wealth, the nation could be seen as only trying to exempt parental responsibility for a parent, rather than focusing on child`s development to become a rational social member. Therefore, this study suggests a reasonable and efficient solution of parenting policy of divorced family for the purpose of welfare and socialization of the minors. Recently, after the divorce, the issues on child rearing expenses were brought up but supporting only on child rearing expenses inheres inhumane thinking that child upbringing is only up to provide food, clothing and shelter. In many developed countries, divorce means only the end of marital status and parents take corporate responsibility for the upbringing of their children. Because, it is difficult to provide the basics for the children before the necessary financial support, the nation should implement the pre-financial aid policy, and consider to re-collect the payments afterlife. Furthermore, it is essential to verify such expenses to secure their propriety. The improvement for the system to prevent immoral rearer alteration is also needed. The court is nearly impossible to take care of all these duties. Thus, setting up the communal childcare auxiliary agency is definitely necessary.

경기북도 신설의 당위성과 방법론

소성규 ( Sung Kyu So ) 한국법정책학회 2004 법과 정책연구 Vol.4 No.2

독일 접경지역 지원 정책의 시사점 -접경지역지원법과 실증적 사례를 중심으로-

소성규 ( Sung Kyu So ) 한국법정책학회 2007 법과 정책연구 Vol.7 No.2

결혼이민자 인식조사를 통한 다문화가족 법제도의 개선방향 -포천시 사례를 중심으로-

소성규 ( Sung Kyu So ) 한국법정책학회 2010 법과 정책연구 Vol.10 No.2

In the Korean society, the numbers of immigrants and the multicultural family have increased in foreign population since 1990. These foreigners mostly live in Seoul and Gyenggi-do, and among those cities in Gyenggi-do, Pocheon has the highest foreigners rate. As a result of this social change, Act on the treatment of foreigners in Korea, and Multicultural family support act established, and there have been studies on the actual conditions of multicultural families and their rights, and social supports which have brought about a huge interest in a diverse society in Korea. This research presents a policy plan through a basic investigation for Korea where it is becoming a multicultural society. Some of the past researches on multicultural family from the legal perspective mainly assessed its support policies and legal system ,and thus, Legislative assessments about multicultural family laws and reviews about multicultural family policies were like questions to solve. This research is based on comparative analysis and interpretative approach. However, it is different from that of past analysis in a sense that it has legal problems and its resolutions from the point of view of multicultural families who are the major among foreigners in Korean society. Still, there are some problems concerning this research. The survey method is not formal and the area of study is limited because it has a sampling bias (Pocheon, Gyenggido) due to insufficient funds and time. However, this research contains not only an observation of perception on multicultural family but also the method of study to fulfill the goal and the purpose of this research. Furthermore, government statistics are supplemented to substantiate our thesis more logically. Yet, the main research technique is primarily on legal studies about perception of multicultural family. This study provides certain directions for changes in the constitution. First, Korean federal and local governments must advertise and change their people`s recognition on multicultual family. Second, this research provides improvement measurements for educational issues. Third, there are also certain alternative solutions for unemployment and children issues. Fourth, constructing infrastructure for multicultural family is necessary. Fifth, specialists for this cultural cases and a social network must form in order to support multicultural family. Lastly, this investigation suggests a plan to unify foreign administrations. To maintain this act, since Act on the treatment of foreigners in Korea is about rights and nationality acquisitions for foreign residents and workers and Multicultural family support act affects only people who are going to acquire Korean nationality, we suggests to regulate these laws to bring about Korean society into a melting pot. Furthermore, we propose for local governments to amend their standardized laws since they are abstract and general. Moreover, Korean government must give incentives for their local governments when they pay grants. Just like a gender equality index to bring about equality in gender, each policy must consider foreigners and multicultural family and adopt foreigner equality index into their acts.

종교단체의 법적 규율을 위한 입법적 시론 -이른바 종교법인법의 제정을 중심으로-

소성규 ( Sung Kyu So ) 한국법정책학회 2012 법과 정책연구 Vol.12 No.2

우리나라는 ``하나의 독특한 종교적 실험실(a unique religious laboratory)``이라고 표현할 만큼 다양종교들이 공존하고 있는 종교다원주의적 사회이다. 2008년 현재 한국에는 자생종교와 외래 종교 등을 합해 510여개 이상의 교단·교파가 존재하고, 한국의 전체 인구 가운데 53%가 스스로를 종교인으로 인식한다. 그러나 이러한 종교현황에도 불구하고 우리나라에서 종교단체를 통일적으로 규율하는 입법은 찾아 볼 수가 없으며, 이로 인해 여러 가지 다양한 종교적 문제를 야기시키고 있으며, 이러한 문제의 해결을 위해 이른바 종교법인법의 제정을 요구하는 움직임들이 본격적으로 나타나기 시작하였다. 이에 본 논문에서는 그간 논의되어 온 내용을 중심으로 종교법인법의 제정필요성 및 제정방향을 검토하고, 구체적인 법률안을 제시하고자 한다. 우리는 종교법인법의 제정을 통해 여러 긍정적인 효과가 발생할 것으로 생각된다. 특히 종교단체가 법인화 되면 법률의 규율대상이 되어 투명해 질 수 있을 것이며, 정교분리의 효과로서 정치인이 종교계의 눈치를 보는 관행이 없어지고, 종교인들이 정치계를 기웃거리는 등의 잘못된 풍조도 없어지게 될 것이다. 또한 종교의 자유를 저해한다는 비판이 있을 수는 있지만, 종교단체가 통일적으로 관리됨에 따라 사이비종교 등으로 인한 종교문제가 사라질 것이다. 물론 종교법인법의 입법과 관련하여 기존의 법제도로 충분히 규율이 가능하다는 이유 등을 들어 이를 반대하는 견해도 있다. 그러나 종교법인법의 제정은 지금까지 만연된 종교계 및 종교단체의 문제점들을 개선하고 종교 본연의 자세와 역할을 강조함으로써, 종교가 우리사회에 등장하게 된 본래의 모습을 찾아갈 수 있는 지침을 제시해 줄 것으로 생각된다. Our country is a religious pluralistic society where various religions are co-existing and is characterized as ``a unique religious laboratory``. In 2008, more than as much as 510 religious bodies / religious sects existed in all, including religions created spontaneously along with other foreign religions. In Korea, 53% of Koreans believed that they are religious people. In spite of the fact of this current state of religion, a unifying legislation governing the religious groups can`t be found in Korea, thus leading to several different religious problems and the movements being required to enact the Religious Corporation Act in earnest to solve the problems. This thesis will address the necessity and direction of an enactment in the Religious Corporation Act based on the study discussed. It`s thought that various positive effectives have been occurringthrough the enactment of the Religious Corporation Act. Especially, religious groups can become transparent, provided that they are incorporated as provided by law and upon the division of religion and state, the practice that politician have been glancing at the religious world will disappear and also the wrong tendency that religious people snooping around the political world like that will be gone also. I understand that there will be a criticism hindering the freedom of religion,but the religious problem such as pseudo-religion will disappear as religious groups are getting managed integratively. Certainly, there is an opinion that objects to the reason in which the existing legal system can regulate sufficiently in accordance with the legislation of Religious Corporation Act. However, the enactment of the Religious Corporation Act can improvethe prevalent problem in the religious groups and emphasize its true posture and role; by doing this, it is thought that religion give us guidelines that can find in its true light after it appeared in this society.

북한이탈주민의 가족관계등록과 중혼문제해소를 위한 법제도 개선방향 -경기도 북한이탈주민 인식조사를 중심으로-

소성규 ( Sung Kyu So ),손경식 ( Gyeong Sig Son ) 한국법정책학회 2011 법과 정책연구 Vol.11 No.2

북한이탈주민의 보호 및 정착지원에 관한 법률상 "북한이탈주민"이란 군사분계선 이북지역에 주소, 직계가족, 배우자, 직장 등을 두고 있는 사람으로서 북한을 벗어난 후 외국 국적을 취득하지 아니한 사람을 말한다. 북한을 이탈하여 우리나라에 입국한 이탈주민은 1990년대 이전까지는 그리 많지 않았으나, 1990년대 말 북한의 경제난 등을 거치면서 그 숫자가 크게 증가하여 한국에 입국한 이탈주민의 수가 2만 명을 넘어섰다. 이처럼 크게 증가하고 있는 북한이탈주민이 대한민국 국민으로서 우리사회에서 인간다운 삶을 영위할 수 있도록 하고, 향후 통일의 주역으로 중요한 역할을 할 수 있도록 하는 것은 우리 모두의 책무이다. 그러나 우리나라에 입국하여 생활하고 있는 북한이탈주민의 상당수는 여러 분야에서 많은 어려움을 겪고 있는 것으로 나타나고 있다. 특히 북한이탈주민들의 숫자가 계속 증가하면서 가족단위의 입국이나 기혼자중 배우자를 북에 두고 입국하는 사람이 많아지면서 가족관련 사항들이 새로운 사회문제로 부각되고 있다. 본 연구에서는 북한이탈주민들이 한국사회에서 겪고 있는 가족법분야와 관련된 법률문제 중 기혼자의 재혼에 관한 법규의 문제점 등을 검토하고 이에 대한 개선방안을 제시하고자 하였다. 이를 위해 본 연구에서는 일반적인 문헌적 고찰과 함께 실증적 고찰방법으로 경기도에 거주하고 있는 북한이탈주민들을 대상으로 인식조사를 실시하고, 그 결과를 분석함으로써 실제 북한이탈주민에게 필요하고 현실적인 개선방안은 무엇인지를 검토해 보았다. 인식조사는 경기도 북한이탈주민 돌봄 상담 센터의 도움을 받아 2011년 2월 말 현재 경기도에 거주하고 있는 북한이탈주민 4,891명 중에서 신분노출을 극도로 꺼리는 이들의 특성을 고려하여 인식조사에 응할 것으로 예상되는 169명을 표본으로 선정하여 면접과 전화 또는 이메일 송수신 방법으로 진행하였다. 인식조사결과 북한이탈주민들의 혼인이나 재혼 욕구는 매우 높았다. 특히 북한에서 혼인한 사람 중 약 80%가 재혼의사를 갖고 있었으나, 우리 민법 제810조의 중혼금지로 인해 합법적인 재혼에 어려움을 겪는 사례가 자주 나타나고 있다. 합법적인 혼인을 위해서는 북 잔존 배우자와 혼인관계 해소가 선행되어야만 한다. 북 잔존배우자와 혼인관계 해소를 위해 2007.1.26 북한이탈주민의 보호 및 정착지원에 관한 법률 제19조의 2를 신설하여 재판상 이혼제도를 도입했다. 그러나 북한이탈주민들은 북 잔존배우자와의 재판상 이혼제도에 대해 매우 부정적인 생각을 갖고 있었다. 한국에 살지도 않는 사람과 허용하고 있는 재판은 형식적이라는 의견이 지배적이다. 북한이탈주민들은 중혼의 원인이 되고 있는 가족관계등록부 기록방식 개선을 원하고 있었다. 응답자의 75.3%가 북한에서의 결혼사실과 배우자 인적사항 등을 무조건 기재하지 않거나 원하는 경우만 기재하여야 한다고 생각하고 있었다. 그러나 가족단위 입국자들의 신분관계 연속 등을 감안할 때 무조건 기재하지 않는 것은 문제의 소지가 있으므로 기재하는 것을 원칙으로 하되 필요할 경우 기록하지 않을 수 있는 예외조항 마련이 필요하다고 본다. 북한에 배우자를 남겨두고 입국한 사람 중 재혼을 희망하는 사람들이 중혼문제로 더 이상 어려움을 겪지 않도록 제도적 보완이 필요하다. 한국 법에 익숙하지 못한 북한이탈주민들이 재판을 통해 소기의 목적을 달성하기란 그리 쉬운 일이 아니라고 생각된다. 따라서 중혼문제의 원인을 제공하고 있는 『대법원 가족관계등록예규 제219호의 개정』을 제안한다. 가족관계등록에 관한 법률 시행에 맞춰 2007년 12월 10일 제정한 대법원 가족관계 등록예규 제219호에 의하면 "보호대상자의 배우자가 북한에 거주하고 있는 경우에는 가족관계 등록부에 혼인사유, 배우자 성명, 출생연월일 및 배우자가 군사분계선 이북지역에 거주하고 있는 취지와 그 거주지를 기록"하도록 하고 있다. 바로 이 규정을 ``당사자가 북한 잔류자와 혼인관계유지를 원하지 않는 경우는 기록하지 않을 수 있도록 예외규정 도입``을 검토해볼만 하다. 물론 장차 남북한 주민의 자유로운 왕래나 남북통일 시 새로운 중혼문제에 봉착할 수 있다는 일부의 우려에도 귀를 기우릴 필요가 있다. 그러나 언제 올지도 모르는 미래의 불확실한 가능성을 이유로 현재의 법률상 고충을 방치하는 것은 국민으로서 당연히 누려야 할 혼인의 권리를 침해할 우려도 제기될 수 있다. 인식조사결과 북한이탈주민들의 혼인에 대한 욕구가 매우 높음을 감안하여 재혼을 원하는 북한이탈주민의 자유로운 혼인보장을 통해 행복한 삶이 실현될 수 있도록 중혼의 원인을 제공하고 있는 가족관계등록방식 개선은 어떤 형태로든 이루어져야 하겠다. 그리고 장기적으로는 현재 정부에서 제정을 추진 중인 가칭 "남북 주민 사이의 가족관계와 상속 등에 관한 특례법"에 북한이탈주민과 관련되는 혼인 등 가족법 분야도 폭넓게 적용할 수 있도록 향후 공론화 과정에서 이에 대한 전향적인 검토를 기대해본다. 급증하고 있는 북한이탈주민들이 더 이상 이방인으로 남지 않고 대한민국 국민이라는 자부심을 갖고 안정적으로 생활할 수 있도록 관련법과 제도보완이 지속적으로 이루어져야 할 것으로 판단된다. According to the Protection of Defecting North Korean Residents and Support of Their Settlement Law, "Defecting North Korean residents" mean persons who have their residence, lineal descendants, spouses and work places in North Korea and who have not acquired any foreign nationality after defecting from North Korea. The number of North Korean defectors to South Korea was not big before 1990s. However, after North Koreans suffer economic difficulties during late 1990s, the number of North Korean defectors exceeded 20,000 people. I think it is our responsibility to help North Korean defectors enjoy the rights of human beings and play an important role in reunifying Koreas. But it turns out that almost all of the North Korean defectors who live in South Korea have suffered a lot in many fields of their life. Especially, as more and more North Koreans defectors come to South Korea as family units or after already got they married in North Korea, family related issues from North Korean defectors are emerging. The purpose of this study is to review the problems for North Korean defectors have in the matter of existing marriage and divorce provisions related to the family law area, and to suggest solutions regarding present situation. To achieve this purpose, unlike the previous studies which focused on referring books, an empirical analysis was adopted in this study. As the part of the empirical analysis, a survey on North Korean defectors` perception on living environment in South Korea was conducted and after analyzing the survey, we reviewed how we can help North Koreans defectors effectively and what is a realistic measure to better the life of North Korean defectors in South Korea. The survey was done on 169 chosen North Korean defectors out of 4,891 North Korean defectors who lived in Gyeonggi Province as of late February of 2011 by the help of North Korean defectors Caring & Counseling Center after considering their characteristics of not revealing identities. The survey shows that North Korean defectors have a very strong desire to get married or marry again. Especially, more than 80 percentage people who are already married have an intention to get married again, but according to the South Korea`s civil law of 810 article, committing bigamy is illegal. To have a new marriage life in Korea, North Korean defectors have to end the relationship legally first with the spouses who are left in North Korea. North Korean defectors have a very negative view toward the fact that they can divorce spouses who live in North Korea in South Korean courts, which is possible according to the Protection of Defecting North Korean Residents and Support of Their Settlement Law`s Article 19-2. The prevailing view is that to have a divorce suit with spouses who don`t live in Korea is a mere formality. North Korean defectors ask for the improvement of domestic relations register form which causes committing bigamy. Around 75.3% of North Korean defectors who conducted the survey think they must not be forced to write down about their or their spouses personal information and they can write them down on the domestic relations register only if they want to. However, if we consider the continuity of family status of North Korean defectors who fled to Korea as a family unit, it is desirable, as a rule, for North Korean defectors to write down requested information. But at the same time, to contain an exceptional clause should be needed. It is ascertained that the prejudice level by South Koreans toward North Korean defectors is serious through the survey. 77.9 % of respondents rated South Koreans prejudice toward them as serious or slight serious. So the survey shows that changing South Koreans attitudes toward North Korean defectors is necessary. Desirable direction which was drawn from the survey is that institutional complement is needed so that North Korean defectors who are in Korea don`t have to suffer from the problems of bigamy. My judgement is that it will be very difficult for North Korean defectors who are not accustomed to Korean Law to accomplish the intended goal through trial. The suggestion I would like to bring up is to revise "family registration regulation 219" which causes the problems of bigamy and which was enacted by the Supreme Court. According to the regulation number 219 which was enacted by the Supreme Court on Dec 10, 2007 for the purpose of adapting to a family registration law, if spouses of North Korean defectors live in North Korea, then North Korean defectors must write down the reason for the marriage, name & date of birth, address of spouses and the reason why their spouses live in North Korea. It is worth examining the regulation number 219 if you want an exceptional clause to be contained in the regulation number 219. And the exceptional clause is - if the person directly involved doesn`t want to maintain the marriage relationship with the spouse who live in North Korea, then they don`t have to write down their spouses information. Next, tentatively named "a law covering family relations and inheritance between Residents of South and North Koreas" is being enacted, I hope the issues that my study dealt with, such as marriage and divorce related to the North Korean defectors, will be reviewed as forward-looking approaches. Lastly, it seems that we, South Koreans need to change perceptions to North Korean defectors so that North Korean defectors can take pride in becoming residents of South Korea and live a stable life and no more feel themselves as strangers. My judgement is that we, South Koreans need to change perceptions to North Korean defectors and by making up for weak points in the current system and current law, we can help them encounter less financial hardship.

일반연구논문 ; 발전소 주변지역 지원사업에 관한 인식조사 연구 -포천복합화력발전소 주변지역 주민과 전문가·교사를 중심으로-

소성규 ( Sung Kyu So ),김종수 ( Chong Soo Kim ) 한국법정책학회 2015 법과 정책연구 Vol.15 No.3

발전소 주변지역 주민을 지원하기 위하여 『발전소 주변지역 지원에 관한 법률』(이하 발주법으로 약칭한다)이 제정되어 있다. 동법은 발전소의 주변지역에 대한 지원사업을 효율적으로 추진하고 전략사업에 대한 국민의 이해를 증진하여 전원개발을 촉진하고 발전소의 원활한 운영을 도모하여 지역발전에 기여함을 입법목적으로 하고 있다. 입법목적을 발전소 소재 지역 주민입장에서 보면, 지원사업을 통한 지역발전이 목적인 것이다. 현행 발주법에 의하면, 지원사업은 발전기가 설치되어 있거나 설치될 지점으로부터 반지름 5킬로미터 이내의 육지 및 섬지역이 속하는 읍.면.동으로 한정하고 있다(발주법 제2조). 지원사업의 종류는 기본지원사업, 특별지원사업, 홍보사업, 그 밖에 주변지역의 발전, 환경.안전관리와 전원 개발의 촉진을 위하여 필요한 사업 등이 있다(발주법 제10조). 발주법상 기본지원사업은 발전소 건립 시작부터 발전소가 가동 종료될 때까지 매년 발전소 주변지역에 지원하는 사업이다. 반면에 특별지원사업은 발전소가 건설중이거나 건설이 예정된 주변지역과 그 특별자치도.시.군.구 및 자치구(이하 지방자치단체라 한다)에 대하여 시행하는 일시적인 지원사업이다. 발전소 소재 반경 5킬로미터 뿐 만 아니라해당 자치단체 전체를 위하여 할 수 있는 사업이다. 이러한 점 때문에 발전소가직접 들어서는 주민과는 갈등의 소지가 있다. 물론 해당 지역주민들의 충분한 의견수렴과 소통이 있다면 큰 문제가 아니다. 그러나 현행 법제도상의 문제점을 포함하여, 현장에서는 그렇지 못하다. 그래서 해당 지역 주민들과의 갈등이 존재한다. 이 연구는 발전소가 건립되는 지역 주민들과 지역전문가·교사들의 인식을 조사하여 현행 제도가 무엇이 문제인지, 법정책적 시사점을 찾아 발주법상 지원사업의 발전방안을 모색하고자 한다. 다만, 전국적으로 발전소가 소재하는 지역이 많고, 지역마다 사정 또한 다르다. 모든 지역의 주민들의 인식조사를 통한 연구가 바람직하지만, 시간적, 경제적 여건의 한계로 말미암아 경기도 포천시 소재포천복합화력발전소로 한정하고자 한다. 이 연구는 전국 발전소 주변지역 전체를 포괄할 수는 없지만, 발전소 주변지역 주민들의 일부 실증적 인식은 찾아 볼수 있을 것이다. 결론적으로 발전소 주변지역 지원사업의 발전방안과 연구작업을 다음과 같이제시하고 있다. 첫째, 공공갈등관리의 제도화이다. 둘째, 지방차원에서의 상호신뢰와 민주적 참여를 통한 소통과 합의의 과정을 통해 갈등을 해소하는 사회적자본 증진시스템으로서의 민주적 로컬거버넌스 체제의 조기 구축작업이다. 셋째, 지역주민에게 혜택이 돌아갈 수 있는 방안을 모색하기 위해서는 신개념의 지역주민 지원사업 모델구축 작업의 필요성을 제시하고 있다. The Act on Assistance to Electric Power Plants-Neighboring Areas (AAEPP) is established to support residents around power plants. The purpose of this Act is to promote the development of electric power resources, strive for the harmonious operation of electric power plants and contribute to regional development by efficiently carrying out assistance programs to the neighboring areas of electric power plants and raising public awareness of electric power business. From the residents`` perspective, the primary purpose of this Act is to promote regional development through assistance programs. According to this Act, the assistance programs are confined to the area of a Eup/Myeon/Dong, which includes the land and island located within five kilometer radius from the location where an electric generator of an electric power plant is already installed or to be installed (AAEPP Article 2). The kind of assistance programs is basic assistance, special assistance, public relations, and other programs that are necessary for the development of the neighboring area, its environment and security management, and the advancement of the development of electric power resources (AAEPP Article 10). The basic assistance is an annual program that is aimed at developing neighboring areas of the power plant, which begins from the construction of a power plant till the suspension of an operating power plant. However, the special assistance is a temporary program for a neighboring area where an electric power plant is being constructed or prearranged to be constructed and areas of the relevant Special Self-Governing Province, Si, Gun and autonomous Gu (hereinafter referred to as local government). Therefore, it not only assists the neighboring area within five kilometer radius but also supports local government. This difference in legislation and programs creates conflicts for residents about the power plant construction. This, of course, may not be a major problem when a broad variety of opinions from the residents are considered. However, inadequate communication along with the problems of the current legislation during the process of power plant construction is widely seen as a serious issue in reality. Thus, there is constant conflict within this system. This research scrutinizes the existing problem of the legal system and suggests its legal policy implications and its development plan through an awareness investigation of residents, experts, and teachers in the region around the power plant. Nevertheless, power plants are operating in various places across the country. Although it is ideal to analyze all of the regions, this research focuses only on Pocheon Combined Cycle Power Plant in Pocheon, Gyeonggi-do because of economic and time factors. Thus, this research at least provides some empirical recognition of the people around the power plant. Lastly, the enhancement strategies are as follows. First, public conflict management should be institutionalized. Secondly, an early establishment of democratic local governance system, which promotes social capital and settles conflicts through mutual trust and democratic participation at local level, is necessary. Lastly, a new concept of assistance program model should be constructed to benefit residents around the power plant.

통일교육 활성화를 위한 법제도 개선방안

소성규 ( Sung-kyu So ) 한국법정책학회 2017 법과 정책연구 Vol.17 No.2

통일교육지원법은 통일교육에 관한 기본법령으로 평가할 수 있다. 그러나 통일교육에 관한 기본법령으로 평가하기엔 다소 부족한 측면이 있다. 즉, 통일교육지원법 제7조에 나타난 통일교육 반영 규정과 제8조의 학교의 통일교육 진흥에 관한 정부책임을 임의규정으로 하고 있는 것 등이 그러하다. 이러한 측면에서 통일교육의 필요성에 대한 논의 가운데 공공기관 내지 공적영역에서의 통일교육의 필요성에 대해서는 다시한번 생각해 볼 필요성이 있다. 종래 통일교육은 주로 정치학 내지 교육학 측면에서 다양한 논의가 있어 왔다. 통일교육에 관한 법제도적 관점에서 논의는 그리 많지 않았다. 이 연구는 공적 영역에서의 통일교육에 대한 현황을 살펴보고, 입법적 개선이 필요한 사항과 제도적 개선이 가능한 방안을 중심으로 살펴보았다. 이러한 연구목적을 달성하기 위해 독일사례를 통해 우리나라에 시사점을 찾고자 한다. 통일교육지원법의 개정방안으로는 첫째, 통일교육주간 법적근거 마련, 둘째, 국가 및 지방자치단체 통일교육 지원 책무 강화, 셋째, 통일관의 지정 및 취소근거 마련, 넷째, 공무원 등에 대한 통일교육의 실시, 다섯째, 통일교육에 대한 인식개선과 홍보에 대한 근거 마련, 여섯째, 지역통일교육센터와 통일교육위원 역할론에 대한 재검토 등을 살펴보았다. 제도 개선방안으로는 첫째, 통일교육 기관의 유기적 협조체계 구축, 둘째, 공공기관별 통일대비 전문가 양성과정 개설, 셋째, 학교통일교육, 특히 대학 통일교육 활성화 지원 확대, 넷째, 사회통일교육 활성화 방안 모색, 다섯째, “한국형 보이텔스바흐 합의”(Beutelsbacher Konsens) 노력 등을 살펴보았다. The Unification Education Support Act stipulates basic laws and ordinances for promoting and supporting education on the unification of South and North Korea. The Act, however, is lacking in various aspects as an institutional framework for unification education. In particular, Article 7, which prescribes the reflection of unification education and Article 8, which states the promotion of unification education at schools are not mandatary provisions. As such, one should contemplate the necessity of unification education in public institutions or in public domains. Previously, discussions on unification education were confined to the realm of politics and education and little has been discussed in a legal perspective. Thus, this research presents the current situation of unification education in public institutions and then investigates areas, which requires legislative improvements. From this, the paper derives possible measures to enhance the legal framework for unification education. In order to do so, it scrutinizes the cases in Germany and seeks to find its implications in South Korea. To amend the Unification Education Support Act, the paper establishes legal grounds for Unification Education Week and contests to reinforce accountability for unification education support among public institutions such as the ROK government and local governments. Moreover, it constructs legal basis to designate or to cancel unification buildings, and describes ways to enforce unification education for public servants. It also finds grounds for improving and promoting awareness of unification education. Finally, the study reexamines the role of regional unification education center and unification education committee. Regarding improvement measures, the paper proposes to establish a close cooperation system in institutions of unification education, to foster experts on unification by creating a professional unification education course in public institutions. In addition, it looks into increasing support for unification education at schools, and seeks ways to revitalize unification education in Korean society. Lastly, it researches the Korean version of efforts to bring “Beutelsbach Consensus.”