RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      검색결과 좁혀 보기

      선택해제
      • 좁혀본 항목 보기순서

        • 원문유무
        • 원문제공처
        • 등재정보
        • 학술지명
          펼치기
        • 주제분류
        • 발행연도
          펼치기
        • 작성언어
        • 저자
          펼치기

      오늘 본 자료

      • 오늘 본 자료가 없습니다.
      더보기
      • 무료
      • 기관 내 무료
      • 유료
      • 한국의 對 中國 技術 移轉에 관한 연구

        薛永基 동국대학교 지역개발대학원 1994 開發論叢 Vol.3 No.-

        China have pushed a foreign open economic and economic developing plan from 1978's. Thus China have brought up a big economic nation of the third of the world in present. It is caused by technology introduction of developing countries positively more than anything else. Korea is accomplished labor-intensive industries in priority to China technology transfer from 1988's. thus Korea is losing comparative advantage of these industries, but as China come from the biggest investment nation, Korea must be set up foreign investment policies of a long term and it must be compelled positively. This dissertation is abstracted as follows: First, Korea must be comstrained labor-intensive inbustries and increased copital-intensive industries step by step. Second, Korea have invested oriented-Bal Hae economics area, this oriented-investment is must be controlled possible and diversified investment area. Third, to China investment have many difficulties because it is non-murtrity of infrastructure. So, Korea government must be lavished administrative support government to investment industries. Forth, Korea have concentreted in manufacturing industries exeedingly, this is possible that it bring to investment distortion and so it must be diversified a classification by industry of investment. Fifth, corrency amount is expanding in China increasingly, this bring to inflation thus, it's possible bring to losses by exchange risk of investment nations. So, Korea must be transfered exchanged risk or transfer pricing in investment possibly to China. In addition to these, investment(technology transfer) to China by Korea has many strategic factors. For examples, unskill of international commercial practices, removement of MAN-MAN-DI thinking, etc. but technology transfer to China by Korea must be invested a long-term plan and contributed necessarily to economic growth of China. If it is possible, technology transfer to China by Korea will be effected in the future.

      • PLC model과 雁行形態的 發展論의 비교연구

        설영기 동국대학교 경제경영연구원 무역연구부 1997 國際貿易硏究 Vol.21 No.2

        To establish the theory of technology transfer, we must be inclusion all economics and business administration side owing to have complexity and diversity of technology transfer. Therefore, technology transfer can't a definition by one word. And so, many scholars spread out a theoretical background of technology transfer with emphasis on one part. That is so say, S.H.Hymer give emphasis to a oligopolistic technology, and life cycle of products by R.Vernon, know-how by D.J.Teece, life cycle of technology by C.Ryan & D.Ford, processing innovation by W. Abernathy & J.Utterback, products life cycle of catching up by OKAAMOTO KANAMAE professor etc. The theories of technology transfer issued by many scholars distinguish from innovation and catching up of technology. Therefore, the abstraction of this thesis will show us the following. First, the technology transfer theory of innovation technology is the theory of product life cycle. This is a technology transfer type of the advanced countries. Second, the technology transfer's theory of catching-up technology is the theory of catching-up product life cycle. This is a technology transfer of the less developing countries.

      • 多國籍企業의 企業合倂·買收(M&A)에 관한 硏究

        薛永基 동국대학교 경주대학 1990 論文集 Vol.9 No.-

        M&A (Mergers and Acquisitions) means unified concepts for integrated single enterprise and to abtain asslets or stock acquirement and management right, etc. MNE's M&A is one of the FDI as well as licensing. Joint Venture. Motivation of M&A is promotion of enterprise growth, increasing of capital capacity, dissipation of management risk, diversification of production, acquirement of the able man, etc. By these factors, MNE' promote MNE's growth strategy and reconstructing. The style of M&A is mainly hostile TOB. this method is acquisited by open stock market through unknownstock holders and counter moving on hostile TOB is rely on Staggered Board, Poison-Pill, super Majority, Pac-man Defense, etc. In these days, MNE's M&A is increasing, because M&A is favor asset acquirement, increasing of banking facilities's funds, development of M&A techniques, Junk Bond, LBO, etc. By these purposes, in 90's korea enterprises must be promoted M&A to counter moving international competitive power's weakening by Won(₩) currency evaluation, trade barrier's increasing by strenthening of protectionism and bloc formation of world economics. Effectived M&A policies by these factors, as following ; ① M&A techniques must be studied on staggered board, poison-pill, pac-man defense, super majority, etc. ② M&A related organ (banking facilities, M&A consulting, brocker, etc) must be established M&A professional department and serve information. ③ Training of M&A specialist ④ M&A promotion to counter moving against bloc information of world nconomic and enlargement of goverment financial funds. Otherwise, in domestic M&A policies, as following ; ① MNE's M&A must be counter moved by development of management environment and strenthening of financial standing as restructuring of comparative disadvantage industries. ② foreign M&A of comparative advantage industris must be protected by staggered board, pac-man defense, super majority, poison-pill as M&A defense techuiquies.

      • 國際技術移轉의 理論的 背景에 관한 연구

        설영기 동국대학교 경주대학 1997 東國論集 Vol.16 No.1

        To establish the theory of technology transfer, we must be inclusion all economics business administration side owing to have complexity and diversity of technology transfer. Therefore, technology Transfer can't a definition by one word. And so, many scholars spread out a theoretical background of technology transfer with emphasis on one part. That is to say, S.H.Hymer give emphasis to oligopolistic technology, and life cycle of products by R.Vernon, know-how by D.J.Teece, life cycle of technology by C.Ryant D.Ford, processing innovation by W.Aberathy and J.Uterback, products life cycle of catching up by AKAMATS KANAMAE professor etc. The theories of technology transfer issued by many scholar distinguish from innovation and catching up of technology. Therefore, the abstract of this thesis will show the following. First, the technology transfer theory of innovation technology is the theory of product life cycle. This is a technology transfer type of the advanced countries. Second, the technology transfer's theory of catching-up technology is the theory of catching-up product life cycle. This is a technology transfer of the less developing countries.

      연관 검색어 추천

      이 검색어로 많이 본 자료

      활용도 높은 자료

      해외이동버튼