http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
- 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
- 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
RISS 인기검색어
- 검색키워드
- 저자 : 서익진 (검색결과 38 건)
- 무료
- 기관 내 무료
- 유료
-
發展樣式으로서의 韓國의 開發獨裁 : 作動方式과 論理의 糾明을 中心으로 To Clarify the Way and the Logic of Its Functioning
徐翼鎭 한국경제학회 2002 經濟學硏究 Vol.50 No.1
본고는 개발독재기라 부를 수 있는 1960년대 초부터 1980년대 중반까지의 시기에 한국경제에서 작동했던 개발독재 발전양식의 작동방식과 논리의 규명을 목적으로 한다. 이를 위해 특히 발전국가론의 논의들을 바탕으로 하면서 조절론적 접근이 두 개의 핵심 개념인 축적체제와 조절양식을 차용하여 개발독대 발전양식의 작동에 관한 총체적 해명을 시도한다. 먼저, 장기적으로 안정적인 성장과 경제구조의 고도화를 가능케 한 거시적 성장 메커니즘으로 정의되는 축적체제는 차입·수출경제기반 축적체제로 파악된다. 다음, 축적체제의 원활한 작동을 보장하는 미시적 행동규범과 사회적 조절절차들의 총체로 정의되는 조절양식은 개발독재적 조절양식으로 규정되며, 이는 국가조절의 극단적 형태로서 발전국가의 전형으로 제시된다. 본고는 특히 차입·수출경제기반 축적체제와 개발독재적 조절양식을 형성한 다양한 요소들간의 논리적 및 실제적 연관과 이들의 상호정합성을 밝히는 데 초점을 두며 따라서 이 발전양식의 위기에 관한 분석은 사상된다. The aim of this paper is to clarify how the mode of development characterized by developmentalist dictatorship functioned during the period from early 1960s to mid 1980s in Korea. For this purpose, we try to present a comprehensive interpretation of this mode of development by using two major regulationist terms, accumulation regime and mode of regulation, and by being based on discussions already made, especially under developmentalist State approach. On the one hand, the accumulation regime, defined here as a macro-economic mechanism of growth ensuring both an long-term stable growth and meaningful structural changes, is materialized as borrowing-exporting economy-based one. On the other hand, the mode of regulation, considered here as an ensemble of micro-economic behavioral norms and social procedures ensuring exact functioning of mode of accumulation, is characterized as on of developmentalist dictatorship that we can consider as an extreme form of developmentalist State or State regulation. Our main preoccupation is to demonstrate the way of articulation between diverse elements of macroeconomic mechanism of growth and those of governmental procedures of regulation, by taking particular attention on their logical and practical coherence. It is therefore natural not to find here an analysis on contradictions of this mode of development and its eventual crisis.
-
-
서익진 한국사회경제학회 2020 사회경제평론 Vol.33 No.2
The purpose of this article is to clarify that the crisis of Park Chung-hee's development model of industrialization forms the economic background of the Buma Struggle. First of all, from a review of existing studies on the Struggle, this can be definded as an uprising of the people bloc, including the students and the general public, against the bloc of domination, and its character as a “people’s democratic struggle.” We define the development model operated in the period covering the entire Park Chung-Hee era as one of developmental dictatorship for industrialization. Its mechanism of operation is analyzed from the perspective of the junction between the external and internal aspects. In addition, we emphasis that its achievements (in growth and in employment) give a physical foundations of popular dictatorship thesis and Park Chung Hee’s syndrome. Yet it is revealed that the accumulation of contradictions inherent in this development model provoked people's discontent and anger. In short, deepening the dependence of the national economy on the one hand resulted in foreign debt crisis, and on the other hand, various imbalances accumulated inside the national economy were accompanied with an accumulation of complaints of the people bloc. People were widely mobilized in the process of state-led industrialization, but they were excluded or relatively sacrificed in the process of distributing its fruits. It can be proved by many aspects such as soaring prices during a chronic inflation, reinforcement of labor exploitation and government suppression of labor movements, increasing tax burden, increasing urban lower class and its neglect (without the social safety network), concentration of unearned income and widening gap between the rich and the poor. However, the promise of growth first ideology was not kept even in the period of boom in 1976-1977. Rather, the defense tax and value-added tax increased the tax burden on people. The policy of economic stabilization, taken in April 1979, transferred the burden of recession upon people. The accumulated complaints of people turned to anger, and they finally joined the democratization protests led by students in the Buma region, which developed into a people's democratic protest that demanded the overthrow of dictatorship and the guarantee of survival rights. 이 글의 목적은 박정희 공업화 발전모델의 위기가 부마항쟁의 경제적 배경임을 밝히는 데 있다. 이를 위해 먼저 부마항쟁에 관한 기존연구들의 검토를 통해 부마항쟁이 학생과 민중 일반을 포괄하는 민중블록이 지배블록에대항해 일으킨 봉기로서 ‘민주민중항쟁’으로 규정하고, 박정희 경제개발 모델을 개발독재 공업화 발전모델로 규정한다. 이 발전모델의 성과(성장과 고용)는 대중독재론과 박정희 신드롬의 물적기반이 되기도 했지만, 그 내재적인 모순의 누적은 민중의 불만을 누적시켰다. 이는 만성 인플레이션 하에서의 물가 급등, 노동 착취의 강화와 정부의노동운동 탄압, 민중의 조세 부담 가중, 도시하층민의 증가와 방치(사회안전망 부재), 불로소득의 집중과 빈부격차 확대 등으로 나타났다. ‘선 성장 후분배’라는 약속은 1976~1977년의 대호황에도 불구하고 지켜지지 않았고, 오히려 방위세와 부가가치세가 민중의 조세부담을 급증시키고, 1979년 4월 경제 안정화 대책은 불황의 부담을 민중에게 전가시켰다. 민중의 누적된 불만은 분노로 폭발했고, 이들은 부마 지역에서 발생한 학생 주도의 민주화 시위에 대거 가담해 독재 타도는 물론 민중 생존권 보장도 요구하는 민중민주항쟁으로 발전시켰다.
-
-
-
-
-
-
서익진 한국주거환경학회 2016 주거환경(한국주거환경학회논문집) Vol.14 No.4
This study, firstly, demonstrates, in the theoretical side, through an examination of existent studies that the cultural urban regeneration(UR) can be considered a type of UR and strategies and techniques for its implement are already developed. Afterwards, on the basis of this theoretical grope, we proceeds to analyse the process and the characteristics of UR of Masan old downtown in Changwon city. We concluded that this case is far from the strategy of promotion of cultural industries, but it can be belong to the type of cultural UR in the aspects of using cultural resources, construction of a cultural space and operation of cultural programmes for the participation of communities. We can draw as its characteristics public initiative in the construction of a cultural space, private spontaneity for old downtown regeneration and simultaneous pursuit of cultural purposes(improvement of quality of life) and economic ones market revitalization).
-
연관 검색어 추천
이 검색어로 많이 본 자료
활용도 높은 자료
