朝陽지역의 西漢 유적에 관하여

卜箕大(BOK Gi-dae) 고구려발해학회 2003 고구려발해연구 Vol.15 No.-

Based on the remains of the Former Han dynasty in Joyang, author has investigated the political situation of this area in this paper. In general, it is suggested that the domain of China extend to Laotung area and the Cheongcheon river valley in Yen dynasty, and the Four Chinese Commendaries created at Pyeungyang area in the Former Han dynasty. But this opinion need to make more study. It is certain that the power of the Yen dynasty and the Former Han dynasty appeared in the Manchurian area, and the central power of these dynasties not extended to the Liao-Ho river. If the Chinese power occupied the whole Manchurian area and the part of the Han peninsular, its remains would discover in all direction. Also, its remains will have to show not the intermittent form but the concrete one. As above, it is certain mat the Chinese power extended to Chinchou and Chinshi in the west of the Liao-Ho river. Therefore, it is suggested that the Yen dynasty settled in this area, and the Former Han dynasty established the perfective and administrative system. Afterward, the quasi-independent political system appear to operate in the Later Han dynasty.

광개토대왕비문 연구의 몇 가지 문제에 대하여

복기대(Bok Gi-Dae) 고조선단군학회 2009 고조선단군학 Vol.20 No.-

The tombstone of the Great King Kwang-Gae-To is very important for interpretation of Eastern Asia at around A.D.400. It is true that a great deal of researches on this has been done since the tombstone was introduced for the first time up to present. The direction of the result of the research has been decided according to the profits of the nationalities of the researchers. Especially, Japan and Korea showed tremendous interests on this because they thought according to the interpretations described on the relationships between the two countries on the tombstone will determine the dominion of hegemony at around A.D.400 in Eastern Asia. However, in this writing, I have put aside this point of an argument and emphasized purely on fresh historical investigation about the facts which were appeared on the tombstone. As a result, the two words, 'Chun-Je' and 'Hwang-Chun' which appear at the beginning of an inscription do not mean God but Royal Palace of Buyeo at that time instead. I think this interpretation will give us a chance to have a new idea about Buyeo different from what we used to think of. This article is concerned about foreign conquest of the Great King Kwang-Gae-To, one of our prides of Han-Min-Jok. On Middle School Korean History textbooks and on General Introduction of Korean History, the conquered area by the Great King Kwang-Gae-To was written as 64 fortresses and 1400 villages. This was written based on the result of researches had been done in the past. But what I have found out was much more than this :- 128 fortresses, 3 counties and 2800 villages. The formers are obvious errors. Therefore, our academic society must correct these errors as soon as possible. The writer has presented a few fresh ideas. I think these should be proven by the verification of my school fellows.

위영자문화의 최근 성과와 해석

복기대(Gi Dae Bok) 한국고대학회 1998 선사와 고대 Vol.11 No.-

N/A

하가점하층문화의 주거지에 관한 몇 가지 문제

복기대 ( Gi Dae Bok ) 한국고대학회 2003 선사와 고대 Vol.18 No.-

I find out some features from the survey on the dwelling place of the Xiajiadian, lower stratum. I realize that dugouts and pit houses this period existed at the same and the structures of them are various. Duguts and pit houses are distributed at one place where castle and house are protected naturally. These common dwelling places are closely related to the natural configuration of the ground. This fact plays an important role in understanding the society at that time. The most distinguishing feature is that the fire hole for cooking, of antechamber, is also discovered at the tomb. This fact reveals that for those who use wing of antechamber, is also discovered at the tomb. This fact reveals that for those who use wing of antechamber at that time the world after death is not end of this world but the continuation of this world. I gather from the wing of antechamber that the people at that time believe in a life after death.

특집 1 : 동북아시아 청동기문화의 지역성 ; 하가점상층문화와 릉하문화 비교연구

복기대 ( Gi Dae Bok ) 한국고대학회 2004 선사와 고대 Vol.20 No.-

동북아시아 고고학의 최근 연구 성과 ; 마성자문화(馬城子文化)에 관한 몇 가지 문제

복기대 ( Gi Dae Bok ) 한국고대학회 2005 선사와 고대 Vol.22 No.-

존(尊)의 기원과 계승성에 관한 시론

복기대 ( Gi Dae Bok ) 한국고대학회 2006 선사와 고대 Vol.25 No.-

시론 주거유적으로 본 하가점하층문화의 사회성격

복기대 ( Gi Dae Bok ) 한국고대학회 2008 선사와 고대 Vol.29 No.-

맥(貊)의 기원과 전승에 관한 초보연구

복기대 ( Gi Dae Bok ) 국제뇌교육종합대학원 국학연구원 2011 선도문화 Vol.11 No.-

``Dong yi Liezhuan`` of Hou Han Shu(後漢書) describes that Goguryoe indicates Maeg(貊) because the Maeg(貊)is their totem, it means that their ancestors and descendants quite relate to the Maeg. There are many different kinds of opinions about what the Maeg is because people imagine the Maeg might be a bear, a Kylin, an antelope, a pig and so on and the different point of view of recording history. However, in this paper, it examines ``Haechi`` which has single horn animal might be the Maeg and the Maeg is not a dragon. For example, according to the history of the Maeg and Haechi, firstly, in the case of Korea, the Maeg has been connecting historically before 6500 years ago; from the late Neolithic era, the Bronze age, the Three Kingdoms, Koryo Dynasty, Joseon Dynasty to nowadays, interestingly, the body has been changing in a variety of styles but a single horn on the crown of the head has been remained until now. Secondly, in Japan, this Maeg has been regarding as a sacred animal before 1500 years ago and in China, only in the northern part of the Yellow River could be found it before 1600 years ago. Therefor, geographically, this Maeg should be a totem animal in the Northeast Asia area. Moreover, the result of comparing between Maeg and dragon, these two animals have different characters so the recognition which is about a dragon points to Maeg should be reconsidered, and also the situation that many Chinese scholars still think every animal which has single horn is all dragon should be reanalyzed clearly. Historically, the Maeg has been connecting from generation to generation, now only in Korea, we could see a variety of styles of the Maeg in a different parts of area; the case of combining foreign culture and own culture, not in China, Mongolia and Russia. So this Maeg is not just simply an animal, we should reconsider what the Maeg implies for us.

한국 상고사 연구에 있어서 고고학 응용에 관하여 -요서 지역 고대문화를 중심으로-

복기대 ( Gi Dae Bok ) 국제뇌교육종합대학원 국학연구원 2009 선도문화 Vol.6 No.-

To investigating ancient history is a very complex process with insufficient records in any other world history, however, the solution for this is archaeology in this kind of situation. Even though the history of academic archaeology is not long, it plays very important role to study of ancient history. In the case of Korea, archaeology is the most important part to research into Korea ancient history. However, there are two important problems of applying archaeology. One is how apply archaeology for the Korea ancient history, for example, whether it should be accepted the interpretation of Korea history by Chinese or Japanese or Korean should analysis it by themselves. Another is whether the starting point of the history of Korea should be decided by Chinese records traditionally or Korean historical materials. If the starting point for investigating history is determined at first, the outcome will be entirely different. In this study, as a result of interpretation of relics through Korean historical materials and a Korean point of view, antiquities in Liao Xi area have an affinity with Korea ancient history. Fortunately, in resent years, Chinese archaeology scholars are interested in this area and study, therefore Korean scholars can invest jointly. Unfortunately, if China does not concern to this study, Korea can do anything in this academic area. For example, as the research from China, some ancient ruins was found which have the keys to interpretate possibly as the birth myth of nation of GoJoseon, which is the most important in Korea history. This is a signal to find the history of Gojoseon through archaeology. In fact, it is not a big thing in politically and economically, even it could be a tiny point, however, the outcome of this was surprisingly unexpected because it became a heroic deed for Chinese in modern Chinese history. This distortion project started from only the result of investigation of their history and divided the period of Xia, Shang, Zhou through the exhaustive archaeolocal research. Perhaps Xia Shang Zhou Chronology Project provide the worth of archaeology greatly, since archaeology has been studied. Threrfore, it could be thought that Korea has great potential materials to prove Korea ancient history by Korean.