http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
- 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
- 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
RISS 인기검색어
- 검색키워드
- 저자 : 백윤철 ( Yun Chul Ba다 ) (검색결과 1 건)
- 무료
- 기관 내 무료
- 유료
-
백윤철 ( Yun Chul Ba다 ) 단국대학교 법학연구소 2014 법학논총 Vol.38 No.3
The Information Privacy Rights is the one of the rights that private information can impact on personal life right to control the subject itself. And the difference between Information Privacy Rights and the privacy of the information that traditionally used, based on the information that the privacy of an individual`s private life that is free physical space for decision-making has been to emphasize the exclusion of interference in the traditional sense, and it has privacy and discrimination. For information about privacy rights violations during the most. It is about the CCTV, ``CCTV`` technology for the installation of the expansion of the protection of human rights of the people first think to protect your personal information, and keeping with the principles of the Constitution prohibits excessive ``CCTV`` evidence of ability to admit the evidence. But still ``CCTV`` idea of a view of the installation is a panacea, which is a violation of people`s privacy rights and information about Portrait rights has been forgotten. ``CCTV`` needs and the installation of at least keeping with the principles of the constitutional prohibition must be installed. In addition, installation of domestic airport`s full body scanner become a concern at the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport. Which violate the principles of the Constitution prohibits the excess can be seen as examples. In addition to the Human Rights Commission, the National Pension Corporation personal information from unauthorized view of human rights violations against the recommendation was sitting reading room at the National University Library Person of human rights violations by fingerprint identification system also recommended that measures to protect the personal information. In this perspective, ironically, the current protection of personal information is protecting by Human Rights Committee, rather than the Committee of Personal Information Protection Because of privacy laws are enacted, protection of personal information should not have blind spots, but still protecting personal information law system can not be committed. As I described, the protection of personal information does not abolished, so Act on the Protection of Personal Combine Information have been conflicted with privacy laws. and privacy during work on the important work that the Personal Information Dispute Mediation Committee role. Privacy Commissioner of deliberation and voting rights, but it does not have a ministerial committee that is only good semblance. Thus, the original intent of the Privacy Act that people have the right to receive privacy established by the specific identification method and the abolition of privacy, Privacy Commissioner is able to function with different legal status of their permanent status and country Council also operates as same. If the committee of personal information protection can not function it as they described, the Human Rights Commissioner could possibly protect the basic human rights.
연관 검색어 추천
이 검색어로 많이 본 자료
활용도 높은 자료
