교과서 검정 및 수정에 관한 법제개선방안

백옥선(Baek Ok-Sun) 행정법이론실무학회 2015 행정법연구 Vol.- No.42

2015년 4월 2일 서울행정법원은 교과서 수정명령에 대한 취소소송에서 원고패소판결을 내렸다. 이미 2013년에 교과서 수정명령 취소소송에 관해 유사한 쟁점을 가지고 수정명령의 위법성을 인정한 대법원 판결이 나온 바 있다. 2013년 판결과 마찬가지로 2015년 행정법원의 판결결과에 대해서도 긍정적 · 부정적 시각이 양립하고 있다. 그러나 주목할 것은 2013년 대법원 판결 이후 이번 행정법원 판결에서도 동일한 쟁점이 문제되고 있음에도 교과서 관련법령이 전혀 개선되지 않았다는 점이다. 교과서제도는 사회적으로는 지속적으로 문제제기가 되어 왔으면서도, 제도의 근거가 되는 법령은 1950년대 제정된 이후 거의 정비가 이루어지지 못하였다. 뿐만 아니라 교과서제도와 관련된 판례도 많지 않다. 더군다나 검 · 인정교과서에 대해 교육부가 어디까지 수정을 명할 수 있는 것인지의 문제는 최근에 와서야 비로소 문제되기 시작한 까닭에 교과서 수정명령에 관해서는 판례를 비롯한 법적연구결과가 더욱 없는 상황이다. 이번 행정법원의 판결에 대해 원고들이 항소의 의사를 밝히고 있기 때문에 앞으로도 교과서 수정명령에 대한 다툼은 장기간 계속될 것으로 보인다. 이러한 측면에서 교과서 수정명령에 대한 판례를 분석하고 이를 평가하는 것은 앞으로 교과서제도 운영의 합리화를 위해 시의적으로 매우 필요한 작업이라고 본다. 본 연구는 우리나라의 교과서제도가 적합한지 여부를 판단하기 위한 것은 아니다. 본 연구는 이번 행정법원 판례의 분석 및 평가를 통해 현행법제하에서 논란의 대상이 되는 교과서 검정 및 검정이후에 이루어지는 수정에 관한 법령체계 및 내용상의 문제점과 이에 대한 개선방안을 도출하는 데 목적이 있다. On the 2<SUP>nd</SUP> of April 2015, Seoul Administrative Court ruled against the plaintiff on the action for revocation of the instructions for textbook revision. There have been both positive and negative reactions to this ruling. However, it should be noted that this issue shows the same problems as the rulings for 2013’s instructions for textbook revision, and there has not been any improvement in this matter. Despite the fact that the textbook policy is a reoccurring societal problem, the foundations of the policy have not been modified following the enactment of the law in the 1950’s. In addition, there have been very few judicial precedents regarding the implementation and management of the textbook policy. Recently, judicial precedent problems have arisen in reviewing to what extent the Ministry of Education can revise authorized textbooks, as there have not been any previous cases or legal research on the matter of instructions for textbook revision. As the plaintiff’s have expressed their intention to appeal to the rulings of the Administrative Court, it appears that the case for the instructions for textbook revision will be prolonged. Taking this into consideration, the analysis and evaluation of this ruling regarding instructions for textbook revision is crucial at this time for the rationalization of implementing and managing the textbook policy. This research is not designed to evaluate whether the nation’s textbook policy is appropriate. This paper aims to evaluate the current case of the Administrative Court to deduce the problems of the legal system and contents, and provide improvement measures regarding textbook authorization and post-authorization instructions for revisions, which is becoming a target of controversy under the current legislation.

고령자 운전규제에 관한 법적 고찰

白玉仙(Baek, Ok-Sun) 중앙법학회 2015 中央法學 Vol.17 No.4

The issues of elderly drivers in aging societies are growing as an area of interest not only in South Korea but also internationally. However, the current 「Road Traffic Act」, including 「Passenger Transport Service Act」 and 「Trucking Transport Business Act」 regarding company vehicle laws, do not have a legislative system that allows for the early recognition and prevention of accidents due to elderly drivers’ abilities. As many elderly drivers are behind the wheel without adequate testing of their physical and mental capacity to drive, it is crucial to review the drivers’ license system to solve the issues of elderly drivers before the expected increase in elderly driver’s problems with the aging of the baby boomer generation. It is important to carefully approach the issue of modifying driving restrictions on elderly drivers. The need for caution in approaching the issues of elderly drivers comes from the various aspects of the problem. While there is a need to maintain and strengthen driving restrictions of elderly drivers to secure road traffic safety, on the other hand, the restriction of elderly drivers may prevent the freedom of movement amongst the aging population and thus bring about issues regarding aging population problems. This research distinctly clarifies that as strong driving restrictions are not placed on the elderly as a direct response to their age, driving restrictions on elderly drivers should not only maintain a fundamental perspective of restricting high-risk drivers but also aim to establish rational restrictive criteria based on the age of the elderly driver. Through this approach, it can be consider socially acceptable. This paper aims to draw legislative measures for future modifications of driving restrictions on elderly drivers through reviewing and establishing the problems with current legislations and legal implementations of driving restrictions on the elderly. Research includes discussions on, the constitutional legitimacy of applying stronger restrictions on elderly drivers as compared to general drivers, and methods of restrictions and how the settings of restrictions should be established for elder drivers in the future. In addition, examples of legislation in other countries have been reviewed and proposals for methods of legislative improvement for the modification of elderly driver’s driving license system are given.

대형마트 및 기업형슈퍼마켓 영업일시(營業日時) 규제에 관한 법적 고찰

백옥선(Baek Ok-Sun) 행정법이론실무학회 2013 행정법연구 Vol.- No.36

민간자격등록제도의 문제점과 법적 개선방안 : 민간자격 등록요건인 “다른 법령에서 금지하는 행위와 관련된 분야”에 대한 해석을 중심으로

백옥선(Baek, Ok Sun) 중앙대학교 법학연구원 2020 法學論文集 Vol.44 No.1

2008년 ｢자격기본법｣에 민간자격 관리를 위한 등록제가 도입된 이후 등록 민간자격의 수는 급격히 증가하고 있고, 등록된 민간자격으로 인한 폐단도 증가하는 추세이다. 정부는 민간자격의 폐해를 해소하기 위하여 민간자격등록에 대한 여러 가지 제도 개편을 추진하고 있으나, 근본적으로 민간자격 등록제의 실효성이나 정당성에 대해서는 여전히 의문이 제기될 수 있는 상황이다. 민간자격으로 인한 소비자의 피해를 최소화하기 위한 장치로서 등록제를 도입한 것이 타당한지에 대한 문제를 논외로 하더라도, 현행 민간자격 등록제는 등록요건 등을 비롯 여러 제도적 장치가 다른 등록제와 비교할 때 등록제의 기능을 하는 데 부족하게 입법되어 있기 때문이다. 이는 앞으로 민간자격 등록이 지속적으로 증가하는 상황에서 민간자격 등록제 운영과 관련된 법적 분쟁을 증가시킬 것으로 예상된다. 아직까지 민간자격 등록에 대한 법적 분쟁은 거의 없었다고 할 수 있다. 그러나 최근 들어 민간자격 등록요건 중 하나인 “다른 법령에서 금지하는 행위와 관련된 분야”에 대한 해석에 관한 소송과 법제처의 법령해석사례가 나오고 있고, 법원과 법제처의 해석의 방향이나 결과도 상이하게 나타나는 상황이라는 점에서도 논의의 필요성이 있다. 특히 민간자격등록제도에 대한 해석상의 문제들이 나타나는 이유가 일정부분 입법적 문제점에서 비롯된다는 점에서 민간자격 등록요건인 “다른 법령에서 금지하는 행위와 관련된 분야”에 대한 검토를 통하여 민간자격 등록제도의 입법적인 해결방안의 마련도 필요하다. 본 논문에서는 민간자격 등록이 거부되는 제한사유를 넓게 해석하는 것은 민간자격등록제의 도입취지에 부합하지 않으며, 과잉적인 제한이 될 수 있다는 것을 비판적으로 지적하였다. 또한 이러한 해석의 원인이 현행 ｢자격기본법｣에 도입된 민간자격 등록제도의 문제점에 있는 만큼 민간자격 등록제를 폐지하는 것을 검토할 필요가 있다고 하였다. 현실적으로 등록제의 폐지가 어렵거나 유지의 필요성이 인정된다면 최소한 관련규정을 재정비하여야만 한다는 방안을 제시하였다. In 2008 a registration system was introduced in the ｢Framework Act on Qualifications｣ for the management of private qualification. Following its introduction, there was a rapid increase in the number of registered private qualifications, and also an increase in the harmful effects of registered private qualifications. In order to provide solutions for the harmful effects of private qualification the government implemented various policy reforms, however fundamentally the issue lies with the questions raised on the effectiveness and legitimacy of the registration system for private qualification. Even if the issue of whether it is appropriate to implement the registration system as a safety net to minimize consumer damage from private qualification is considered as irrelevant, the requirements for registration and other institutional strategies in the current registration system for private qualification, when compared to other registration system, can be seen as inadequate to implement the function of a registration system. Under such circumstances where there is a continuous increase in private qualification registration, it is expected that legal dispute related to the administration of private qualification registration system will also increase. Up until now, it can be said that there have been very few legal disputes regarding requirements for registration of private qualification. However, there is also a need for discussion in that there have been lawsuits and case studies by the Ministry of Government Legislation regarding the interpretation of one of the requirements for registration “fields related to acts prohibited by other laws”, and that the direction and outcome of interpretation by the court and the ministry are different. In particular, as the reasons for interpretive problems of the private qualification registration system can been viewed as due to partially a legislative problem, the examination of the requirements for registration of private qualification “fields related to acts prohibited by other laws” in order to establish a legislative solution is deemed necessary. In this paper, In this paper, it was critically pointed out that the broad interpretation of the reasons for restricting private qualification registration does not conform to the purpose of introducing the private qualification registration system and may be an excessive restriction. It was also said that it was necessary to consider abolishing the private qualification registration system as the cause of this interpretation lies in the problem of the private qualification registration system introduced under the ｢Framework Act on Qualifications｣. In reality, if the abolition of the registration system is difficult or the need for maintenance is recognized, the relevant regulations should be reorganized at least.

에너지사업 계획절차 관련법제 정비방안

백옥선(Baek Ok Sun) 한국토지공법학회 2017 土地公法硏究 Vol.79 No.-

이번 정부 들어 발전소와 관련된 에너지정책 및 계획에 대한 이슈가 급격하게 부각되면서, 정부는 에너지계획의 수립이나 변경을 어느 정도로 자유롭게 할 수 있는 것인가, 혹은 정부가 전기를 비롯한 에너지 계획을 수립하는 과정에서 어느 정도의 사회적 합의를 거쳐야 하는 것인가에 대한 원론적인 의문이 제기되고 있다. 그간 에너지 분야에서도 발전소나 송전선로 등 에너지시설의 설치와 관련하여 여러 사회적 갈등이 있어 왔으나, 안정적인 에너지공급을 최우선으로 하는 에너지 분야의 특수성으로 인해 최근까지도 크게 이슈가 되지 못하였다. 그러나 최근의 상황은 국가 전체의 에너지계획의 수립･변경･폐지에 대해서도 절차법적 측면에서의 논의가 필요하다는 요청을 강하게 불러일으키고 있다. 이와 같은 배경에서 본 논문은 에너지계획을 추진하는 과정 전반에 걸친 절차법제를 검토하는 것을 목적으로 한다. 현행법상 에너지사업과 관련된 규율은 다수의 법률에 산발적으로 규정되어 있으므로, 관련 법률 모두를 분석하는 것은 한계가 있다. 본 논문은 에너지계획의 수립부터 구체적인 추진과정에 걸친 계획법제 전반을 검토하여 관련법제의 개선 방안을 마련하는 것을 목적으로 하므로, 에너지사업 계획법제 전반에 걸친 검토와 함께 발전소나 송전선로 등 에너지시설의 설치를 신속하게 추진하기 위해 제정된 ｢전원개발촉진법｣을 중심으로 절차법적 논의를 하였다. 특히, 대규모 발전소나 송전선로의 신규설치는 많은 부분 ｢전원개발촉진법｣을 통하여 건설되었거나 건설중임에도 불구하고, 지금까지 ｢전원개발촉진법｣에 대해서는 크게 연구된 바가 없었다는 점에서 이를 분석하는 것 역시 나름의 의미가 있다. 또한 ｢전원개발촉진법｣은 1978년 제정이후 지금까지 6번의 개정밖에 거치지 않았고, 실제 대부분의 개정이 전원개발사업을 신속하게 추진하기 위한 기반을 마련하는 것이었다는 점에서, 현 시점에서도 이 법이 필요한지 그 존재의의에 대해서도 재검토가 필요하다. 이와 같은 문제의식을 바탕으로 본 논문에서는 크게 세 가지의 논의를 하였다. 첫 째, 에너지사업을 추진하기 위한 정부의 행정계획과 에너지사업자의 사업계획 간의 독특한 관계에 대한 분석과 함께, 에너지법과 에너지계획 체계 및 단계를 전반적으로 검토하였다. 둘째, 현행 ｢전원개발촉진법｣ 상의 사업추진절차의 내용과 절차법적 사항을 분석하고 문제점을 도출하였다. 마지막으로 에너지사업, 즉 대규모 발전소 및 송전선로 등 전기공급을 위한 대규모국책사업 추진을 위한 계획절차를 어떻게 개선할 필요가 있는지 법제정비방향을 서술하였다. Issues regarding energy policies and business planning have come to light following the transfer of power to the new government. The fundamental question of whether the government will be able to freely make and implement decisions regarding energy policies and business planning or whether a certain amount of popular consensus will implement into decision making is being open to debate. While in the past there were cases of social issues and conflicts regarding the installation of energy facilities such as power plants and transmission lines, due to the nature of the field of energy placing the highest value its stable production and supply, these issues were never truly brought into the frontline. However, currently the need for the discussions of nation-wide energy business planning including its implementation and modification especially in regards to its regulation proceedings have amplified. With this background, this paper aims to discuss the overall procedures of implementing energy business planning. As most regulations regarding the energy industry is spontaneously developed under various different legislations, there is a limitation to reviewing all energy related regulations. Due to the nature of this research to provide a proposal for improvement on regulations related to energy business planning development and detailed implementation procedures, the legislation that aims for the efficient installation of energy facilities, ｢Electric Power Source Development Promotion Act｣, was reviewed in detail. In particular this paper holds significance, as most large scale energy plants and transmission line installation were based on the regulations provided in the ｢Electric Power Source Development Promotion Act｣ but there has not been any significant study on its implications. In addition, since the establishment of the ｢Electric Power Source Development Promotion Act｣ in 1978, there have only been 6 amendments, and there needs to be a review on whether this legislation remains necessary for the modern-day energy industry. Implementing a more critical outlook, this paper can be divided into three larger sections. First, energy law and overall energy business planning organization and stages are reviewed, with a focus on the relationship between government administrative planning and energy business companies business plans for energy business implementation. Second, the study and identification of problems with the business implementation procedures of the currently implemented ｢Electric Power Source Development Promotion Act｣. Finally, proposals on how to revise legislations related to the planning procedures in order to drive large scale national energy business projects are specified.

해상재난관리체계의 법적 문제점과 개선방안

백옥선(Ok Sun Baek) 중앙법학회 2014 中央法學 Vol.16 No.2

Over a month has passed since the sinking of the SEWOL passenger ship, yet day by day the media is putting forward new analysis for cause of the tragedy. The violation of duty by the crew, inadequate initial response, the absence of a disaster management control tower, the suspicion of preferential treatment of certain private rescue service enterprises, poor standards of vessel inspections, non-compliance of ship operation regulations are just a few of the endless problems that have surfaced as the problem behind the SEWOL disaster. It can be said that through the SEWOL disaster, the present state of the ROK`s crisis management ability has clearly been exposed. At this point, it is crucial to examine disaster management law regarding maritime disasters caused by passenger vessels to prevent a repeat of an incident like the SEWOL disaster. On the other hand, it also holds importance as it calls for interest towards the otherwise neglected disaster management act. Generally, the disaster management system is categorized into the areas of prevention, preparation, response and recovery. When each stage of the disaster management system comes together organizationally and co-operatively, the objectives of disaster management can be reached. Following such divisions, the most crucial stage of disaster management is prevention. In the event of a disaster, there must be thorough preparation to respond in order to effectively protect the lives of the citizens. However, as preparation and response is commonly considered to be related to organization and activities, it is has aspects that prove to be difficult in applying the principles that are traditionally studied in the area of administrative law. For such reasons, the research undertaken in by the field of law has been focused on the safety system of police law`s risk prevention in the area of prevention. Thus, awareness of the neglect of research in disaster management act on the overall is necessary. In addition, there was a greater weakness in the study of maritime disaster management in comparison to general disaster management. The reason such can be related back to the nature of maritime disasters to be more closely linked to a number of international conventions of varying legal natures rather than domestic law. With this background, this paper analyzes the legal system and study of maritime disaster management system and presents the current legal systems problems and also gives a proposal for its improvement. The laws related to maritime disasters caused by passage vessels are 「Framework Act on The Management of Disasters And Safety」, 「Ship Safety Act」, 「Maritime Safety Act」, 「Rescue and Aid at Sea and in the River Act」, 「Seafarers Act」, and 「Marine Transport Act」. The various systems that are regulating these laws were divided by disaster management stages and analyzed to deduce the problems. In addition, this paper clarifies that disaster management is a duty of the nation state, and researches whether the duty of disaster management can be carried out with cooperatively with private organizations, and if so to what extent is private cooperation suitable.

상생협력적 기업생태계 구축을 위한 「대·중소기업 상생협력 촉진에 관한 법률」의 개선방안 연구

백옥선 ( Ok-sun Baek ),박기선 ( Ki-sun Park ) 한국중견기업학회 2013 중견기업연구 Vol.4 No.2

우리사회에서 상생의 가치가 강조된 것이 어제 오늘의 일은 아니다. 그러나 최근 기업상호간의 상생의 가치는 경제민주화 논의와 함께 어느 때보다 중요하게 부각되고 있다. 기업 상호간의 상생을 목적으로 하는 법률로 「대 · 중소기업 상생협력 촉진에 관한 법률」이 있다. 이 법률은 대기업과 중소기업 간의 격차를 해소하고, 대 · 중소기업간 상생을 위한 협력을 통해 국민경제의 성장을 촉진하기 위한 법률 이다. 이 논문은 「대 · 중소기업 상생협력 촉진에 관한 법률」의 제정배경과 헌법적 정당성을 검토함으로써, 동법에서 정하고 있는 여러 가지 제도에 대해 검토하고 법적 시각에서 문제점을 분석하였다. 구체 적으로는 사업조정 제도와 적합업종제도에 관련된 규정들을 비판하고, 법적 개선방안을 제시하였다. 한편, 얼마전 제정된 「중견기업 성장촉진 및 경쟁력 강화에 관한 특별법」과 관련하여 「대 · 중소기업 상생협력 촉진에 관한 법률」과의 관련성에 대해서도 검토하였다. 「중견기업 성장촉진 및 경쟁력 강화에 관한 특별법」은 중소기업과 대기업의 사이에 놓여있는 중견기업에 대한 법률로서, 이 법률이 시행되면 기업간 협력을 규정하고 있는 「대 · 중소기업 상생협력 촉진에 관한 법률」도 개정이 필요하기 때문이다. 논문에서는 「중견기업 성장촉진 및 경쟁력 강화에 관한 특별법」의 제정 이후 「대 · 중소기업 상생협력 촉진에 관한 법률」의 구체적 개정방안을 제시하였다. Emphasis on the value of mutual cooperation in Korean society is not a new agenda. However, recently along with the debates of economic democracy amongst the values of mutual cooperation, mutual cooperation of enterprises has been greatly magnified. The 「Act on the Promotion of Collaborative Cooperation Between Large Enterprises and Small-Medium Enterprises」 has the purpose to promote mutual cooperation of enterprises. This Act is designed to resolve the differential between Large and Small-Medium enterprises, and to promote the growth of the national economy through collaborative cooperation amongst Large, Small-Medium enterprises. This thesis first reviews the enactment background and the constitutional legitimacy of the 「Act on the Promotion of Collaborative Cooperation Between Large Enterprises and Small-Medium Enterprises」. Using these findings, the legal problems with the policies legislated by the 「Act on the Promotion of Collaborative Cooperation Between Large Enterprises and Small-Medium Enterprises」 are evaluated. Specifically, the system of business coordination and the system of business suitability are criticized, and legal improvement are suggested. Not long ago, the 「Special Act for the Promotion of growth and strengthening competitiveness of Mid-sized Enterprises」 was amended. As an act for Mid-sized Enterprises between Large and Small-Medium Enterprises, following it’s amendment, the act which regulates cooperation of enterprises; 「Act on the Promotion of Collaborative Cooperation Between Large Enterprises and Small-Medium Enterprises」, revision will also be necessary. This thesis proposes legitimate methods of amendments to the 「Act on the Promotion of Collaborative Cooperation Between Large Enterprises and Small-Medium Enterprises」 following the amendment of the 「Special Act for the promotion of growth and strengthening competitiveness of mid-sized enterprises」.

독일 인정기구법의 제정배경과 내용

이종영(Jong Yeong Yi),백옥선(Ok Sun Baek) 중앙법학회 2013 中央法學 Vol.15 No.2

Bei der Einrichtung des europaischen Binnenmarkts hat die Europaische Union(EU) gem. Art. AEUV Artikel 12 AEUV die Erfordernisse des Verbraucherschutzes zu berucksichtigen. Ein wichtiger Teilaspekt des Verbraucherschutzes in der EU ist die Sicherstellung der Produktsicherheit. Hierzu gehort die Akkreditierung, die in der EU durch die am 1. 1. 2010 in Kraft getretene Verordnung (EG) Nr. 765/2008 einheitlich geregelt wird. Zusammen mit der Konformitatsbewertung sowie der Marktuberwachung ist diese Bestandteil eines Gesamtsystems, welches sicherstellen soll, dass Waren und Dienstleistungen gesetzlichen Anforderungen und Normen entsprechen. Vor Einfuhrung dieser Verordnung wurde die Akkreditierung bereits in allen Mitgliedstaaten praktiziert. Allerdings bestand aus Sicht der EU ein Harmonisierungsbedurfnis, da sich voneinander abweichende Systeme entwickelten, in denen die Akkreditierungsanforderungen uneinheitlich streng gehandhabt wurden. So existierten vor 2010 in Deutschland sowie in Italien mehrere Akkreditierungsstellen, die jeweils unterschiedliche Konformitatsbewertungstatigkeiten pruften, wahrend in anderen EU-Mitgliedstaaten wie dem Vereinigten Konigreich bereits vor der Einfuhrung der Verordnung nur eine einzige Akkreditierungsstelle tatig war. Kern der neuen Verordnung ist die Vorschrift, dass jeder Mitgliedstaat nur eine einzige nationale Akkreditierungsstelle errichtet, welche nicht gewinnorientiert und unabhangig von gewerblichen Konformitatsbewertungsstellen arbeiten soll. Vor diesem Hintergrund hat der Bundestag am 31. 7. 2009 ein Gesetz uber die Akkreditierungsstelle verabschiedet. Im Rahmen des Akkreditierungsverfahrens uberpruft eine Akkreditierungsstelle, ob Konformitatsbewertungsstellen die Kompetenz und die fachliche Eignung besitzen, bestimmte Konformitatsbewertungsaufgaben durchzufuhren. Ein erfolgreich abgeschlossenes Verfahren wird durch die Erteilung der Akkreditierung beendet. Die Deutsche Akkreditierungsstelle GmbH wurde mit Gesellschaftsvertrag vom 16. 10. 2009 gegrundet. Gegenstand der Gesellschaft sind die Durchfuhrung von Akkreditierungsaufgaben nach dem Akkreditierungsstellengesetz sowie andere Akkreditierungstatigkeiten. Gesellschafter der nicht gewinnorientierten DAkkS sind zu gleichen Teilen der Bund, funf Bundeslander sowie der Bundesverband der Deutschen Industrie e. V. (BDI). Der Prozess der Akkreditierung besteht aus vier Phasen: dem Antragsverfahren, dem Begutachtungsverfahren, der Erteilung der Akkreditierung und dem Uberwachungsverfahren. Mit der Einfuhrung des neuen Akkreditierungsrechts 2009 wurde eine uberfallige Reform des deutschen Akkreditierungswesens durchgesetzt. Die bisherige, im internationalen Vergleich sehr ungewohnliche Struktur wurde zu Gunsten einer Angleichung an die europaischen Gepflogenheiten aufgegeben. Die Umsetzung ist als gelungen zu betrachten. Es darf bezweifelt werden, dass die Bestimmung einer einzigen nationalen Akkreditierungsstelle, wie es vereinzelt befurchtet wurde, tatsachlich zu einer Verschlechterung des Serviceniveaus fuhren wird.

독일 온실가스배출권거래법의 제정배경과 체계

이종영(Jong Yeong Yi),백옥선(Ok Sun Baek) 중앙법학회 2008 中央法學 Vol.10 No.1