수험생 학부모가 낸 수능시험

박태서 (사)방송기자연합회 2011 방송기자 Vol.5 No.-

실효성 있는 한.미 방산협력 방향

박태,Park, Tae 한국방위산업진흥회 1991 國防과 技術 Vol.- No.154

한.미간 기술협력은 각 사안별로 주로 협의하고 있지만, 앞으로는 업체간 기술협력을 보다 확대시키기 위해서 정부간에 이미 체결된 DTIC MoU를 근거로 하여 보다 구체적이고 새로운 절차를 발전시켜나가야 할 것입니다. 앞으로는 정부도 업체간 회의에 공동참여하여, 업체간 협력에 심도깊게 논의하는 등 정부와 업체간에 정보교환을 증가시킬수 있도록 해야 할 것입니다

의료과오소송에서 증인인 담당의사의 신문 등에 관한 연구 -환자 측 소송대리인의 입장에서-

박태신 ( Tae Shin Park ) 홍익대학교 법학연구소 2015 홍익법학 Vol.16 No.1

For disputes over medical cares, litigations have been raised in order to pursue responsibilities of physicians, medical institutions and nurses, and have been increasing. In medical malpractice measures of doctors or medical institutions make patients disappointed and give patients physical and emotional damages seriously. But physicians who have been filed with medical malpractice lawsuits blame the patients due to the fact that they were judged with unsaticefied result by the patients nevertheless they made an efforts to provide proper treatments as an expert. With these reasons, medical malpractice litigations conflict seriously between the parties compared to common litigations, and is common that parties and litigation officials are caught up with the conflicts. Therefore, in process of accountability of a medical malpractice litigations, the parties need to decide emotional and rational determinations. Especially, it is very important to have proper attitude in examining the doctors in charge as a witness at the court. Therefore, this paper has examined what the patient`s attorneys should notice and consider when they examine the doctors in charge as a witness. And I examined the feature of lawsuits in cases the doctors in charge are the witnesses, and the preparations for the enforcement of the cross examins in medical malpractice lawsuits. I pointed out that the doctors as witnesses are different from a general civil litigation`s witness through this study. And it is noted that a patient`s attorney has to explore how to instill impressions of validity of the plaintiffs` claim in courts rather than cross-examination format by unilateral conflict relationship. Finally, I point out that a patients` attorneys have to examine evaluating evidence in courts and importance of advanced preparations for examinations of the doctors in charge.

Postoperative Speech Outcomes and Complications in Submucous Cleft Palate Patients

박태서,배용찬,남수봉,강경동,성지윤 대한성형외과학회 2016 Archives of Plastic Surgery Vol.43 No.3

Background The postoperative speech outcomes of submucous cleft palate (SMCP) surgery are known to be poorer than those of other types of cleft palate. We attempted to objectively characterize the postoperative complications and speech outcomes of the surgical treatment of SMCP through a comparison with the outcomes of incomplete cleft palate (ICP). Methods This study included 53 SMCP patients and 285 ICP patients who underwent surgical repair from 1998 to 2015. The average age of the patients at the time of surgery was 3.9±1.9 years for the SMCP patients and 1.3±0.9 years for the ICP patients. A retrospective analysis was performed of the complications, the frequency of subsequent surgical correction for velopharyngeal dysfunction (VPD), and speech outcomes. Results In both the SMCP and ICP patients, no cases of respiratory difficulty, bleeding, or wound disruption were noted. Delayed wound healing and fistula occurred in 18.9% and 5.7% of the SMCP patients and in 14% and 3.2% of the ICP patients, respectively. However, no statistically significant difference in either delayed wound healing or fistula occurrence was observed between the two groups. The rate of surgical correction for VPD in the SMCP group was higher than in the ICP group. In the subset of 26 SMCP patients and 62 ICP patients who underwent speech evaluation, the median speech score value was 58.8 in the SMCP group and 66 in the ICP group, which was a statistically significant difference. Conclusions SMCP and ICP were found to have similar complication rates, but SMCP had significantly worse speech outcomes.

임상시험 대상자 모집방법에 관한 법적·윤리적 검토

박태신(Park Tae Shin) 한국법학원 2020 저스티스 Vol.- No.178

임상시험은 사람이 가진 질병을 예방, 치료, 개선하기 위해 반드시 필요한 절차이다. 그런데 특정한 조건을 충족시켜야 하거나 대상질병 자체가 희귀질환이라는 등의 사정으로 인해 임상시험대상자 등록에 시간과 비용이 예상 외로 많이 소요되는 경우들이 발생하고 있다. 이러한 대상자등록의 어려움은 임상시험을 중단케 하거나 그 비용을 높이는 원인의 하나로 거론된다. 대상자등록은 잠재적대상자모집을 통해 임상시험 참여의사를 밝힌 잠재적 대상자들을 대상으로 하므로 결국 원활한 대상자등록을 위해서는 효율적인 대상자모집이 필요하다. 따라서 효율적인 대상자모집방법의 모색이 중요하다. 한편 임상시험에 참여하는 대상자는 잠재적인 위험을 감수하고 임상시험에 참여하는 것이므로 임상시험에서 대상자의 안전과 복지가 최우선적으로 고려되어야 하는데, 대상자의 존중, 배려, 보호는 대상자의 참여의 자발성 확보에 기초한다는 점에서 대상자의 진정한 임상시험 참여의사를 왜곡해서는 안 된다. 그런데 최근 새로운 방법으로 대두되는 소셜미디어를 이용한 대상자모집이나 시험대상자모집전문회사를 통한 시험대상자 모집은 잘못된 정보의 확산이나 금전적 보상 등으로 인한 부당한 유인이 되는 방법을 이용한 경우가 상당한 실정이다. 이와 같은 문제점에 대처하기 위해서는 임상시험심사위원회의 심사가 좀 더 정밀하고 엄격하게 이루어져야 할 필요가 있고, 시험대상자모집전문회사 인증제나 종사자에 대한 의무적인 교육이 있어야 할 것이다. A clinical trial is a necessary procedure to prevent, treat, and improve a person"s disease. However, due to circumstances such as the need to meet specific conditions or the rareness of target disease itself, there are cases in which the registration of clinical trial subjects takes a lot of time and money unexpectedly. The difficulty of enrolling subjects is considered as one of the reasons to stop the clinical trial or increase its cost. Subject registration is targeted at potential subjects who have revealed their willingness to participate in clinical trials through potential target recruitment, and in the end, efficient subject recruitment is necessary for smooth subject registration. Therefore, it is important to find an efficient method of recruiting subjects. On the other hand, the subjects participating in the clinical trial take potential risks, so the safety and welfare of the subjects should be considered as the top priority in the clinical trial. In the sense that it is based on, the subject’s intention to participate in the clinical trial should not be distorted. However, recruitment of subjects through social media, which is emerging as a new method, or recruitment of subjects through specialized subject recruiting companies may be misused. In many cases, wrong methods are used, which are emphasizing financial rewards or spreading misinformation. In order to cope with these problems, the review by the Institutional Review Board needs to be carried out more precisely and rigorously. And there must be mandatory training for the workers of the companies or certification system for the recruitment company.

Cyberspace 에 관한 재판관할권 - 미국판례를 중심으로 -

박태신(Tae Shin Park) 연세대학교 법학연구원 2001 法學硏究 Vol.11 No.3

N/A

임상시험 대상자의 건강상 피해에 대한 배상 및 보상에 관한 소고

박태신 홍익대학교 법학연구소 2023 홍익법학 Vol.24 No.3

임상시험 대상자 보호제도로서 매우 중요한 의미를 갖는 대상자가 입은 피해에 대한 보상⋅배상제도가 제대로 기능하기 위해서는 제도의 내용상, 체계상 모순이 없어야 할 것인데, 현행 제도는 다음과 같은 몇 가지 점에서 개선이 필요하다. 먼저 현행법령은 의약품 임상시험의 경우에만 보험가입의무를 규정하고 있는데, 그 외 의료기기나 의료행위와 관련된 임상시험의 경우에도 보험가입의무를 규정할 필요가 있다. 또한 가입보험의 적정성을 심사할 전문인력의 양성이나 위원회 설치를 규정할 필요가 있다. 다음으로 배상절차와 보상절차의 균형 문제와 관련하여 보상절차 뿐만 아니라 배상절차에 관해서도 대상자에게 정보를 제공할 필요가 있고, 배상절차의 경우에도 보상절차와 같이 간이한 피해구제절차를 마련할 필요가 있다. 다른 한편으로는 대상자의 보상청구권의 근거를 명확히 하여 다툼의 소지를 제거할 필요가 있고, 「임상시험 피해자 보상에 대한 규약 및 절차 마련을 위한 가이드라인」 중 규정의 불명확성으로 인해 대상자에게 불리하게 해석될 소지가 있는 부분은 명확하게 정리할 필요가 있다. 또한 임상시험에서 의뢰자나 시험자 등에 비해 상대적으로 대상자의 열세적인 위치에 있는 대상자 보호를 위해 객관적이고 중립적인 조사 및 감정기구, 보상・배상심의위원회의 설치와 인과관계 추정제도를 도입할 필요가 있다. The system of compensation or indemnification for health damage or harm of clinical trial subjects has a very important meaning as a protection system for subjects in clinical trials. Therefore, in order for the compensation/ indemnification system to function properly as a protection system for the target person, there should be no contradiction, so the current system need to be improved in some ways. First of all, the current law stipulates the insurance subscription obligation only in the case of drug clinical trials, but it is necessary to regulate the insurance subscription obligation in the case of other clinical trials related to medical devices or medical practices. In addition, it is necessary to regulate the training of experts or the establishment of a committee to review the adequacy of subscription insurance. Next, it is necessary to provide information to the clinical trial subject regarding not only the compensation procedure but also the indemnification procedure, and in the case of the indemnification procedure, it is necessary to prepare a simple procedure like the compensation procedure. On the other hand, it is necessary to clarify the basis of the subject's right to claim compensation to eliminate the potential for dispute. And it is necessary to clearly organize the parts that may be interpreted unfavorably to the subject due to unclear regulations in the 「Guidelines for Establishing Regulations and Procedures for Compensation for Victims of Clinical Trials」. In addition, it is necessary to establish an objective and neutral investigation and appraisal body, a compensation/indemnification review committee, and introduce a causal relationship presumption system to protect subjects who are in a relatively inferior position compared to sponsors or investigators in clinical trials.

채권자대위권에 관한 이해의 변화 모색 - 보전의 필요성 및 채무자의 무자력과 관련하여 -

박태신(Park, Tae Shin) 한국법학원 2021 저스티스 Vol.- No.186

종래 학설은 채권자대위권을 ‘본래형’과 ‘전용형’으로 구분하여 전자의 경우 보전의 필요성은 채무자의 무자력을 의미한다고 한 반면, 후자의 경우에는 보전의 필요성에 관한 별다른 언급 없이 채무자의 무자력은 요구되지 않는다고 하였다. 이는 전자를 (일반)책임재산보전제도로, 후자를 (개별)채권보전제도로 인식해 온 데에서 기인한 것으로 보인다. 그런데 대법원 2001. 5. 8. 선고 99다38699 판결은 ‘피보전채권과 피대위채권의 밀접한 관련성’, ‘피보전채권의 현실적 이행을 유효, 적절하게 확보하기 위해 필요한 경우’, ‘채무자의 자유로운 재산관리행위에 대한 부당한 간섭이 아닐 것’을 채권자대위권의 ‘보전의 필요성’ 판단을 위한 일반기준으로 제시하였다. 그리고 대법원 2020. 5. 21. 선고 2018다879 전원합의체 판결은 기본적으로 위 요건을 보전의 필요성 판단기준으로 제시하면서도, 피대위권리를 행사하는 것이 피보전채권의 현실적 이행을 유효, 적절하게 확보하기 위해 필요한지 여부에 관한 판단을 위한 고려요소로 ‘채권자가 보전하려는 권리의 내용’, ‘채권자가 보전하려는 권리와 대위하여 행사하려는 권리의 관련성’ 등을 언급하면서 ‘채무자의 자력 유무’는 피보전권리가 금전채권인 경우에 고려할 요소로 제시하였다. 이와 같은 일련의 판결들로 종래의 이원화된 채권자대위권의 보전의 필요성 판단기준이 통일적으로 제시되었으나, 위 전원합의체 판결은 피보전채권이 금전채권인 경우에는 여전히 채권자대위권을 (일반)책임재산보전제도로 인식하고 있는 것으로 보인다. 그러나 법해석의 목표나 현실적 필요성을 고려하면, 피보전채권이 일반금전채권인 경우에도 채권자대위권을 (개별)채권보전제도로 보는 인식전환이 필요한 것으로 보인다. Theories have divided creditor subrogation rights into ‘original type’ and ‘exclusive type’, and the former said that the necessity of preservation means the debtor’s insolvency, while the latter said that the debtor’s insolvency is not required without any particular mention of the necessity of preservation. It seems that the former has been recognized as a (general) responsible property preservation system and the latter as an (individual) claim preservation system. However, the 99Da38699 ruling(the Supreme Court sentenced on May 8, 2001) suggested ‘close relationship between creditor’s claim and subrogated right’, ‘when it is necessary to effectively and appropriately secure the actual implementation of creditor’s claim’, and ‘not unreasonable interference in the debtor’s free property management behavior’ as general criteria for judging the ‘necessity of preservation’ of the subrogation rights of creditors. Also, 2018Da879 the all consensus decision(the Supreme Court sentenced on May 21, 2020) ruled ‘close relationship between creditor’s claim and subrogated right’ and ‘the debtor’s insolvency’ as elements for judging whether the exercise of the subrogated right is necessary. With such a series of judgments, the conventional dualized criteria for determining the necessity of preservation of the creditor subrogation rights were unified, but the all consensus ruling above still recognizes the creditor subrogation rights as a (general) responsible property preservation system. However, considering the objectives and practical necessity of legal interpretation, it seems necessary to shift the perception regarding the subrogation rights of creditors to the (individual) claim preservation system.

도금액 활성화 처리를 통한 CuAg 도금층의 특성 향상

박태인,이규환,정찬영,최승회 한국표면공학회 2023 한국표면공학회 학술발표회 초록집 Vol.2023 No.5

정신장애인의 자기결정권과 행위능력 -일본의 성년후견제도를 중심으로-

박태신 ( Tae Shin Park ) 안암법학회 2008 안암 법학 Vol.0 No.27

Nowadays discussion on human rights are focused on the infringement of human rights of the weak by the socially strong persons and social discrimination. Also, the trend of understanding the human rights as the self-realization is getting stronger. Therefore, the concept of the self-determination right and the self-expression right has come to bear a very significant meaning, and in fact it is keenly needed for the disabled, females, foreign immigrants, HIV-positive persons, etc. to overcome social discrimination and human rights infringement and to promote self-realization while making themselves stay in a clear position. Therefore, new legal structures have emerged in various types according to the new ways of thinking about the human rights in such circumstances, and thus it may be said that the relationship between the self-determination right and the legal capacity system of the mentally disabled persons belongs to a very significant subject. Particularly in such a system of making massive production of the uniform and legally incompetent persons like ours, it becomes inevitable to have a large number of subjects that are to be discussed more in the systematic and ideological dimension. Therefore, as a premise for understanding the realities of the Korean system for the legally incompetent persons, the author has conducted a study specifically on the Japanese adult guardship system which makes it possible to take flexible as well as elastic measures in compliance with the degree of everyone`s diversified power of judgment and necessity for protection in order to make the ideology of "respect for sekf-decision" harmonized with the ideology of "protection of oneself" among examples of legislation in foreign countries, and has prepared this writing so that a constant direction may be presented in order to realize the constitutional ideology of human dignity when our civil law will be amended in the future. In other words, as the system for the legally incompetent persons is based upon the modern thought of the 19th century, it has inherently apprehensions of consequently being contrary to the constitutional ideology of a welfare state, so to speak, unconstitutional traits without being conforming to modern legal sense and it has the problem of being a system with too much emphasis on property management rather than on inheritor protection and physical custody. Therefore, it is emphasized that the enactment of the adult guardship law of a new type in consideration of the protection of the disabled of socially weak persons together with completing throughly of the respect for self-determination right, ideology of generalization and respect for survival ability as seen to be the most important ideologies in the modern society while recognizing the problems of the current-effective system for the legally incompetent persons by changing the basic ideological foundation which is existing in the system for the legally incompetent persons, and through doing this, a systematic foundation to protect the disabled of the insufficient ability of judgment is to be set up, and thus ① it is to become an easy system for people`s use in order to promote social welfare fully for the intellectually or mentally disabled persons, ② a system conforming to the Korean economic, cultural and social environment is to be induced through a comparative review while recognizing the presence of the problem of low-level utilization because the currently effective system for the disabled persons is a system that is equally depriving the legal capacity, ③ efforts will have to be made to improve the method of public notices, etc. because, notwithstanding the concerned person, all the family members will not like the current system where all sentenced facts are being publically noticed by making them recorded in the family register.