http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
박용경 제주대학교 사범대학 1999 백록논총 Vol.1 No.-
In order to prepare the foundation to revive our economy, the government set the basic directions which are to promote the movement to a knowledge based economy and to prepare a qualitative growth base. In the knowledge base economy, as people form and manage the knowledge to affect the competitive power system, organization and culture of the society, the education to form human resources will play an important role in the 21st century. The necessity of economy education in school is very important, It helps students make rational consumer choices. analyze economic problems scientifically when they grow up, make their opinion to minimize uneffective factors and helps to promote an upright economic consciousness. Also. the sudden change of our society that characterizes globalization and informationization asks the important change of the direction of economy education in school that is one field of social studies. First, to develop an information based society, economy education in should be a vital component. In order to help with the understanding of an informationized society, the content of school economy education should be changed. Also, using multimedia educational data and the internet, the teaching way of it should be improved. Second, to foster the consciousness of a cosmopolitan society according to globalization, economy education inschool is necessary It is necessary for a shift of consciousness, that is we must not reject the foreign goods unconditionally. Also, in order to attract foreign investment, when foreign companies do business in our country, we should regard them as our companies regardless of their nationality. Third, to prepare the 21st century society that characterizes the globalization and informationization, it needs urgently the progress of the democracy and market economy together. Therefore the role of economy education in school is required. Most of all, the role of a teacher who has the cool-headed and warmhearted is very important.
중등교사의 미세먼지 관련 건강행위 영향요인: 지식과 태도를 중심으로
박용경,김은휘 한국보건정보통계학회 2020 보건정보통계학회지 Vol.45 No.4
Objectives: The purpose of this study was to investigate the factors affecting health behavior related to particulate matter (PM) in middle school teacher. Methods: The subjects of analysis were 192 middle school teachers. Data were analyzed with SPSS 22.0 program. Results: The greatest influential variable of heath behavior of PM were behavior attitude (β= 0.38, p< 0.001) and knowledge (β= 0.13, p= 0.034). These factors explained for 28.3% of health behavior related to PM. Conclusions: It will be necessary to develop a program to improve knowledge, attitude and health behavior for PM in middle school teacher.
성 미디어 리터러시 인식, 의사소통 능력이 보건교사의 교사 효능감에 미치는 영향
박용경,김은휘,최문지,하영선 한국보건정보통계학회 2023 보건정보통계학회지 Vol.48 No.4
Objectives: This study aimed to investigate the factors influencing teacher efficacy, awareness of sexual media literacy, and communication competence among health teachers. Methods: A descriptive study design was used. Participants included 102 health teachers in K-do. The data were collected from November 5 to 12, 2022. The collected data were analyzed using t-tests, one-way ANOVA, Pearson’s correlation coefficient, and multiple regression through the SPSS 29.0 program. Results: The influential factor for teacher efficacy was communication competence (β = 0.34, p < 0.001). This factor accounted for 22.5% of the teacher efficacy among health teachers. Conclusions: To develop a program that increases teacher efficacy among health teachers, it is necessary to prepare a plan to improve communication competence.
朴龍坰 濟州大學校 새마을硏究所 1987 새마을硏究論文集 Vol.4 No.-
The purpose of this paper is to examine the current status and problems of Korean economy and to suggest policies for Korean economy in order to achieve the attainment an advanced economy. The external environment. including the so-called "three lows" such as low crude oil prices, low international interest rates and the low value of the dollar, are favorable to the Korean economy. However, there exist numerous restrictive aspects such as trade frictions created by the introduction of new protectionist measures, pressures from foreign debt, market opening requests form developed countries and the heavy dependence on Japan for machinery such as parts and semi-finished goods. Thanks to the "three lows" the nation's commodity exports will likely cross the mark of $34 billion worth in 1986 and the nation will see the trade surplus of more than $4 billion by the end of 1986, the first such black-ink figure in the Korea's trade history. In particular, such technology- intensive industries as auto, electronics and machinery have led the way in the export drive. As a result of increased commodity exports spurred by the "three lows" the nation's current account surplus enables our country to reduce its short-term foreign debt and bolster foreign credit. However, the exports to the U. S. and Japan accounted for more than 50% of total exports. Korea's trade deficit with Japan is likely to reach $5.4 billion in 1986. compared with a $3 billion deficit in 1985. This snowballing trade deficit with Japan is attributed to ever-increasing imports of Japanese parts and raw materials for goods exported to the United States. In order to reduce the snowballing trade deficit with Japan, we have to seek to switch imports sources from Japan, to localize the parts and materials of export products which are heavily dependent on imports from Japan, and to expand export to Japan. On the other hand, the trade surplus with the U. S. is estimated to hit the $7 billion mark by the end of 1986. Figures related by the Commerce Department say Korea ranked fifth, after Japan, Canada, West Germany, and Taiwan, among those countries which garnered the biggest trade surplus with the U. S. between January and August in 1986. However, Korea showed the highest surplus increase rate(60.4%). These factors combine to make Korea vulnerable to bilateral trade frictions with the United States. In 1985, 43.3% of Korea's exports to the U. S. are subject ot restrictions of one sort of another. The ratio is exceedingly high when compared with 29.5% for European Economic Community and 32.0% for Japan. The U.S. suggested stricter import restrictions on Korean textilis, footwear, machine tools, etc. by liking her own trade deficit to the Korean surplus. In addition, the U.S. pushed its demands for the protection of intellectual property rights, such as patents, copyrights and trademarks, opening of the service sector, and a call to appreciate the value of the Korean Won against the U.S. dollar. However, it should be understood that the U.S. trade deficit is not Korea's problem but the U.S. problem. As recently as 1981. the U.S. had a trade surplus with Korea. Only in the past four years has the trade balance been in Korea's favor. And even these surpluses have been relatively small. In 1985 Korea's trade surplus with the U.S. was $4.3 billion, which is one twelfth that of Japan and one third that of Taiwan. Furthermore, if we include such items of invisible trade, the purchase of military hardware and the purchase of construction materials and equipment by Korean constructors operating overseas, the surplus dwindles to a negligible level. And the premature opening of our markets allied to our exceptionally high military espenditures and huge foreign debt could be detrimental to the Korean economy which is now striving for elf-sufficiency. In order to overcome the economic friction between Korea and the United States, we will have to switch import sources from Japan to the United States and combine the U.S.capital and technology with Korean human resources which in the long run outpaces the Japanese competitiveness on international markets. Furthermore, Korea will have to make an indepth study of how to forge closer links with the new U.S. senators and opinion leaders. However in order to reduce the snowballing trade deficit with Japan and overcome the economic friction with the United States, above all during the period of favorable economic circumstances in and outside the country we have to seek to intensify the structure of our economy and to be ready for economic conditions in and outsids the country by all means of technology innovation, quality enhancement, productivity improvement, expedition of import substitution and cultivation of small and medium firms, etc.