http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
박순성 ( Sun Song Park ) 북한연구학회 2013 北韓硏究學會報 Vol.17 No.1
This paper describes the formation process of ``the actor-network of the attack against ROK ship Cheonan`` and presents three characteristics (unstability, an actor-network of actor-networks, performativity) of the division system in the Korean Peninsula. After the Cheonan accident (March 26, 2010), the Korean government announced the investigation result that the ROK ship Cheonan had been sunk due to a torpedo launched by a North Korean midget submarine, and proposed a problematization which calls North Korea to assume the responsibility of the attack. In the beginning, the Korean government was in a state of disorder and had a great difficulty in organizing a reliable investigation process and proposing a pertinent problematization. Besides, the investigation results and problematization of the Korean government encountered a lot of scientific criticism and political resistance from the inside and outside of South Korea. The construction of ``the actor-network of the attack against ROK ship Cheonan`` intended by the Korean government was failed. But, an artillery bombardment to the Yeonpyeong island by North Korea (November 23, 2010) and the following military tension in the Korean Peninsula gave an opportunity that ``the actor-network of the attack against ROK ship Cheonan`` was beginning to stabilize. This process of failure and stabilization shows that the division system in the Korean peninsula interpreted as an actor-network is substantially unstable and this unstability of the division system is being controlled by the performativity of the actor-network of the division system itself.
박순성(PARK Sun Song) 비판사회학회 2012 경제와 사회 Vol.- No.94
이 글은 한반도 분단현실에 대한 두 개의 접근으로서 분단체제론과 분단/탈분단의 행위자-네트워크이론을 다루고 있다. 문제의식의 측면에서 분단체제론은 남한과 북한을 하나의 체계로 파악하려고 함으로써 분단현실을 과정으로 이해할 뿐만 아니라 분단이 유지되는 방식을 체계적으로 파악하려고 한다. 이론적·실천적 성과의 측면에서 분단체제론은 억압체제로서 분단체제와 남북한 민중의 대립을 분명하게 드러내었으며, 분단체제가 정치제도나 사회·경제제도뿐만 아니라 ‘국민들 마음속’에서도 내재화되어 있음을 밝혀내었으며, 한반도 분단체제를 지역적·세계적 차원의 체제에 그리고 분단체제극복을 세계체제변혁에 연결시키고 있다. 이러한 성과에도 불구하고, 분단체제론은 분단체제-실체론 또는 분단체제-환원론이라는 비판, 분단체제 형성과 변화에 대한 거대담론에 머무르고 있다는 비판, 적대관계의 일반원리를 넘어서 한반도 분단체제의 작동원리를 구체화시키지 못하고 있다는 비판에 직면한다. 분단/탈분단의 행위자-네트워크이론은 분단체제론의 문제의식과 성과를 잃지 않으면서 분단체제론의 한계를 넘어서려는 시도이다. 이러한 시도의 성공 여부는 향후 분단/탈분단의 행위자-네트워크를 경험적으로 얼마나 치밀하게 추적하고 서술하는가에 달려있다고 하겠다. This paper presents two kinds of approach about the division realities in the Korean Peninsula: the division system theory and an actor-network theory on the division/post-division. The division system theory mainly reveals three realities: the antagonism between the division system and people in the Korean Peninsula; the solidification of the division system within socio-political institutions and mass psychology; the association among the division system, the regional system, and the world system. Moreover, the actor-network theory on the division/post-division endeavors to overcome three main limitations of the division system theory: the tendency of reductionism attributing all socio-political problems to the division system, the absence of analysis concerning the world of everyday-life, and the insufficient distinction of the division system from the general relation of the antagonism.