http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
- 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
- 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
RISS 인기검색어
- 검색키워드
- 저자 : 모미령(Meeryung Mo) (검색결과 1 건)
- 무료
- 기관 내 무료
- 유료
-
2018년 기업가정신 모니터링 사업 : 혁신창업생태계 연구
이정우(Jungwoo Lee),김선우(Sunwoo Kim),김영환(Younghwan Kim),이윤준(Yoonjun Lee),백서인(Seoin Baek),권기환(Kihwan Kwon),모미령(Meeryung Mo),정효정(Hyojung Jung),이승재(Seungjae Lee) 과학기술정책연구원 2019 정책연구 Vol.- No.-
This study monitors the recent entrepreneurship and startup ecosystem to propose timely evidence-based policies for the activation of entrepreneurship focusing on innovative startups. The research questions mainly as follows: What is the status and environment of Korea"s innovative startups? What are the obstacles to establish innovative startups in Korea? The research was conducted at multi-level of national, firm, and individual levels. First, at the national level, using secondary data on 57 entrepreneurship components of 32 countries, international entrepreneurship index newly designed by STEPI have been compared with Korea. Particularly, in consideration of the distinct characteristics of Korea, weight factor adopts the components derived from Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) by experts. Second, at the firm level, this study carried out a comparative analysis focusing on recent global market trends and successful startup cases related to the 4th industrial revolution such as artificial intelligence, robotics, blockchain, and fintech. Third, at the individual level, this study conducted a survey and Focus Group Interview (FGI) with researchers of Government-Funded Research Institutes (GRI) in science and engineering field about the entrepreneurship and startup perception. As a result, total 10 major policy alternatives are derived by main issues and implications from each level. Firstly, at the national level, the results shows the necessity in 1) shifting the policy strategy from ‘Startup Pull’ to ‘Entrepreneurship Push’, 2) establishing entrepreneurial lifelong education system, 3) building the environment for technological finance. Secondly, at the firm level, it derivatively suggests policy alternatives in 1) restructuring the entry regulations in the new industry sectors from ‘Positive Listings’ to ‘Comprehensive Negative Listings’, 2) spreading entrepreneurship and startup culture through improvement of the system for attracting high-quality human resources into the innovative startups and expansion of social safety nets, 3) promoting the global successful startups like unicorns through building the private-led virtuous circle ecosystem of investment and exit. Lastly, at the individual level, it proposes policies in 1) supporting legal and institutional guidelines for researchers’ startups, 2) expanding organizations for supporting technology commercialization and innovative startups, 3) systematizing programs for supporting entrepreneurs from GRI, and 4) constructing the private supporting ecosystem for the researchers who want to establish startups. The results from the unique multi-level research are expected to provide multi-purpose solutions to various fields such as policy makers, startups, and researchers.
연관 검색어 추천
이 검색어로 많이 본 자료
활용도 높은 자료
