http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
- 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
- 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
RISS 인기검색어
- 검색키워드
- 저자 : 남경완 (검색결과 141 건)
- 무료
- 기관 내 무료
- 유료
-
-
남경완 대한연하장애학회 2012 대한연하장애학회지 Vol.2 No.1
Patients after cardiac operation or pulmonary operation often have oropharyngeal dysphagia. So we have to pay attention to their symptom. If we find out sign or symptom, we need to evaluate problems by Videofluoroscopic Swallow Study. We should verify proper approach according to problems. And we have to take into account their cardiopulmonary function. So we should start to intervene oropharyngeal dysphagia by slightly intensity. Patients don't have to feel the burden during intervention. (JKDS 2012;2:27-30)
-
남경완 고려대학교 민족문화연구원 2005 民族文化硏究 Vol.43 No.-
본고는 국어 용언을 의미적으로 분류하는 기준 가운데 상태성과 동작성의 구분에 대해 살펴보고, 이를 통해 상태성과 동작성의 구분이 국어 용언의 의미 분석과 국어 용언의 분류 체계 수립에 어떻게 적용될 수 있는지를 살펴보는 데에 목적이 있다. 이에 따라 우선 상태성과 동작성의 구분에 있어서 나타나는 몇 가지 문제에 대해 살펴보았다. 본고에서는 상태성과 동작성의 구분이 언제나 명확한 것은 아니며, 따라서 상태성과 동작성의 차이가 동음이의어를 가르는 기준이 되지는 않는 것으로 파악하였고, 또한 단의 차원에서도 상태성과 동작성은 상보적 분포를 보이지 않는다는 점에서 기존의 형용사와 동사의 분류에 문제를 제기하였다. 실제 국어 용언의 의미 분석 과정에서는 상태성과 동작성의 구분에 따라 보다 체계적인 의미 분석 결과를 도출하여야 함을 주장하였다. 즉, ‘젊다’, ‘늙다’와 같이 계열적 의미 관계를 형성하고 있는 용언의 경우 상태성과 동작성의 구분을 통해 용언의 의미 분석을 세밀하게 함으로써 동일 계열에 속하는 용언을 공통된 범주로 취급할 수 있다. 또한 ‘저리다’, ‘결리다’와 같이 단의 차원에서까지 상태성과 동작성이 상보적 분포를 보이지 않는 용언의 경우, 이들의 분석을 위해서는 상태성과 동작성이라는 의미 자질의 층위와 형용사와 동사라는 품사 범주의 층위가 구분되어야 함을 주장하였다. 이상과 같이 의미 분석 과정에서 각 단의의 의미 자질을 고려함으로써 개별 어휘 차원에서의 의미 분석 과정이 곧 전체 어휘 차원의 분류 체계를 수립하는 객관적 근거가 되어야 함을 주장하였다. The purpose of this paper is to take a closer look at the distinction of state and activity that have been recognized as a criterion classifying verbs, and to examine how it is applied to meaning analysis of verbs and founding a system of verb classification. In this paper, I argue that the distinction of state and activity isnot always clear, therefore it cannot be a absolute condition that makeajudgementofa homonym, and also because stateandactivityarenotdiscriminateevenat seme level sometimes, the traditional method of classifying verbs, i.e. active verbs and state verbs can be the question at issue. The verbs that belong to the same semantic category can be analysed more systematic though the distinction of state and activity, for instance jeom-ta(“be young”) and neuk-ta(“be old”). But, to analyse the verbs that distinction of state and activity is not discriminate at seme level, for instance jeri-ta(“be sore”) or keolri-ta(“be stiff”), we need to discriminate the level of semantic features like state or activity from the level of part-of-speech like state verbs or active verbs As a consequence,asemanticfeature of the state verbs can be shown like [+state][-active] and that of the active verbs can be shown like[+active][-state].Theverbsthat have a [+state][+active] features are dealt as a middle category of state verbs and active verbs.
-
-
남경완 한국어의미학회 2007 한국어 의미학 Vol.22 No.-
Nam Kyoungwoan. 2007. A Study on the Conventional Pre-nominal Form of Korean Verbs. Korean Semantics, 22. The purpose of this study is to examine the types of the conventional pre-nominal form of Korean verb and to consider how we can determine the category of these types. Some Korean verbs are only appeared on the form of modifying use not using on the form of predicative. In this study, the types of the conventional pre-nominal form of Korean verb are divided to three types. A first type is that the meaning of predicative use and the meaning of modifying use are different(type1) and a second type is that a predicative use are not appeared in corpus(type2). The last type is that an elliptical element can be recovered in the subject position. This type is divided into two cases again according to the character of subject. In former case, the elliptical subject is recovered as a possessor of modified word(type3-1) but in latter case the elliptical subject is recovered by a property of modified word(type3-2). In result, the type1, type2 and type3.2 can be treated as a determiner by a criteria of semantic, morphologic, syntactic construction.
-
-
남경완,오재혁 한국어학회 2009 한국어학 Vol.42 No.-
Ths paper is designed to investigate the aspects of pronunciation of 'ㄺ' and 'ㄼ' in Korean verbal final position and research the reasons that which consonant is selected by Korean speakers in a real pronunciation. For this purpose we research the frequency of the six verb that contains 'ㄺ' and 'ㄼ' in final; there are '읽-', ‘맑-’, ‘낡-’, ‘밟-’, ‘넓-’, ‘짧-’ according to the phonological circumstance dividing, and also proceed the experiment that record the real pronunciation of 20 standard Korean speakers. According to the Peculation of Standard Korean Pronunciation, the pronunciation of 'ㄺ' is /ㄱ/ when it precedes consonants 'without 'ㄱ‘ and the pronunciation of 'ㄼ' is /ㄹ/ except for Korean verb '밟-', '넓적하~', '넓죽하~'. But the result of experiment shows the different aspect of these consonant cluster's pronunciation, In the case of 'ㄺ' the rate of realization of ‘ㄹ’ is over 95% succeeding by Korean ending '-고' and 65% succeeding by ‘-지’, and in the case of 'ㄼ', the rate of realization of ‘ㄹ’ is over 85% succeeding by ‘-고’ and 50% succeeding by ‘-지’ There is no crucial evidences that make some exceptional regulations in 'ㄼ'. This study can be used as a fundamental reference or raw materials when make die regulations of pronunciation of Korean consonant clusters.
-
구조주의적 관점에서의 어휘 의미관계 고찰 - 계열적 의미관계를 중심으로
남경완 한국어의미학회 2019 한국어 의미학 Vol.66 No.-
The purpose of this paper is to comprehensively examine the significance and limitations of the structural perspective study on lexical semantic relations, and to explore ways to view the expansion of semantic relations from an integrated perspective. The flow of research on semantic relations from the structuralist point of view was focused on examining how the perspective of ‘opposition’ has changed. In addition, through the contrast between structuralism and contextualism, we examined how the opposing perspectives of structure/context, langue/parole, and concept/use led to differences in looking at lexical semantic relations. Language is not perfectly systematic, but it is not totally disordered, and establishing a present system in the process of order and disorder cycles is the essential goal of lexical semantic research. To this end, concepts and usage can play a complementary role. In discussing the change and direction of the structuralism, there is a need to look at the semantic relations in an integrated manner and to capture aspects of the formation of new semantic relations. The semantic relations that have been discussed separately as ‘synonymy, antonymy, hyponymy’ are only partially shown to specify the whole lexical semantic system. It needs to be systematically integrated.
-
-
연관 검색어 추천
이 검색어로 많이 본 자료
활용도 높은 자료
