RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      검색결과 좁혀 보기

      선택해제

      오늘 본 자료

      • 오늘 본 자료가 없습니다.
      더보기
      • 무료
      • 기관 내 무료
      • 유료
      • 우리나라와 일본의 분획용 원료혈장 관련 규제 현황 비교

        강대원(Daewon Kang),김상요(Sang Yo Kim),최상은(Sang-Eun Choi) 한국보건사회약료경영학회 2022 한국보건사회약료경영학회지 Vol.10 No.2

        The blood business in Korea has established a governance system based on the Blood Management Act (BMA) and Pharmaceutical Affairs Act (PA). The Korean government has constructed a non-profit securing and supplying system for blood recommended by the WHO. In recent years, the blood self-sufficiency rate is decreasing due to the aging population, increasing the number of indications of plasma-derived medicinal products (PDMPs). It is predicted that the number of people who can voluntarily donate blood is decreasing due to the prolonged COVID-19. Plasma for fractionation (PF) is used as a raw material to manufacture PDMPs that include albumin, immunoglobulins, and clotting factors. The United States is the largest supplier of PF in the world, and Korea imports PF from the United States to meet domestic demand. Although the FDA licenses plasma from the United States, it is vital to confirm the safety and quality of imported plasma. Manufacturing quality management of PF products is carried out in most developed countries based on the GMP guidelines; however, each country has different governance systems. This study compared the Japanese regulatory system with the Korean system to draw implications for improving the efficiency of plasma regulation in Korea.

      연관 검색어 추천

      이 검색어로 많이 본 자료

      활용도 높은 자료

      해외이동버튼