http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
김경량 ( K. R. Kim ),이광석 ( K. S. Lee ) 강원대학교 농업생명과학연구원(구 농업과학연구소) 2011 강원 농업생명환경연구 Vol.23 No.3
This study attempts to analyze the development and characteristics of Korean feed industry. Korean feed industry has experienced a remarkable growth in the last 30 years, especially for automation of feed manufacturing technology, productivity maximization, product development and quality improvement. Considering its importance of Korean feed industry, this study analyzes impacts of Korean feed industry on national economy in terms of effects on production inducement, effects on value-added inducement, and effects on labor inducement. As the production system of animal resources will be diversified and standardized, standardization and diversification of feed products and its quality are inevitable to meet the future demand. Therefore, Korean feed industry is facing crossroad as to how it handles new demand in accordance with the changes in market.
한국 농업농촌분야 국제개발협력의 현황과 과제선정에 관한 연구
박민지 ( M. J. Park ),김경량 ( K. R. Kim ) 강원대학교 농업생명과학연구원(구 농업과학연구소) 2011 강원 농업생명환경연구 Vol.23 No.1
The Study attempts to analyze the present conditions and characteristics of the international agricultural development and cooperation of developed countries and that of South Korea. The development projects with the comparative advantage and priority of implementation have been selected to increase the effectiveness of upcoming international agricultural development. The rural development cooperation projects based on the analysis of the present condition of South Korea are recommended and case studies of developed countries are compared.
수원국의 개발수요 분석을 통한 농업 ODA의 효과성 제고 연구
허태호 ( T. H. Heo ),김경량 ( K. R. Kim ) 강원대학교 농업생명과학연구원(구 농업과학연구소) 2014 강원 농업생명환경연구 Vol.26 No.2
To enhance the effectiveness of ODA, this work tried to investigate the actual conditions and problems in the agricultural and farming village part of Korean international cooperation areas. The major focus of the research was centered on the fact that most cooperation projects have been implement uniformly without any consideration of the characteristics of each recipient country. Against this background a development demand survey was conducted with the experts dispatched to each recipient country, in order to look into the development demands of each recipient country, compare them with a donor``s support details, and thereby explore the differences. The results of the analysis revealed that the development demands of recipient countries had similar weight values in terms of agricultural production technology, food supply, and agricultural development. However, according to the Korea``s support details about agricultural ODA, agricultural production technology part and agricultural development part had been given similar importance, whereas food supply part had a relatively lower support. Accordingly, it was found that Korea``s ODA projects failed to reflect recipient countries’ stage-based development situations, while at the same time the ODA projects have been subjected to uniform implementation predominantly in areas in which Korea has accumulated experience..Moreover, it was found that the regional development priority items drawn from the development demand survey of this work was inconsistent with that of KOICA``s support details. To solve the problem of such in consistencies, it is required to conduct a development demand survey prior to the execution of a project. In other words, it is necessary to conduct a preliminary development survey demand by performing Korean agricultural/farming village training, and then conduct second development demand survey for importance by returning training participants to recipient country and thereby comparing what they feel in the countries with what they learned in the training. In so doing, it is possible to draw effective projects through the discussion of experts of both donors and recipient countries. It is also necessary to choose projects through involving the community through a participatory approach in the areas which have low probability of project failure at the beginning and enhance the effectiveness of projects.