http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
강명관(Kang Myeong-Kwan) 예문동양사상연구원 2007 오늘의 동양사상 Vol.- No.16
조선의 사상계에서 양명학은 대개 부정적인 사상으로 인식되었다. 따라서 양명학의 과격한 형태인 양명좌파는 더더욱 쉽사리 수용될 수 없었다. 그럼에도 양명좌파에 대한 인지와 수용이 없었던 것은 아니었다. 양명좌파에 대한 최초의 인지는 허균에게서 확인되며, 그 이후 이식과 서종태, 김창협, 김창흡 등 다양한 지식인들이 양명좌파를 인지한 것이 확인된다. 물론 이들은 양명좌파가 성리학과는 완전히 대척적인 논리를 펼치고 있는 이단적 사유라는 것을 지적하였다. 그러나 18세기 후반이 되면 서형수와 이충익 그리고 정조의 지적에서 확인할 수 있듯, 양명좌파는 지식인들에게 영향력을 행사하기 시작한다. 물론 양명좌파의 논리를 그대로 수용할 수는 없었고, 그 대안으로 양명좌파의 사상을 문학에 적용한 공안파를 수용하면서 양명좌파의 사상을 수용한 것으로 생각된다. 특히 이탁오와 원굉도의 사상이 널리 유행한 것으로 보인다. 앞으로 18세기 후반 사상계의 지형도 속에서 양명좌파와 공안파의 영향을 보다 구체적으로 확인하는 작업이 필요할 것이다 The doctrines of Wang Yangming was regarded as negative ideas in the world of thoughts in Joseon. Furthermore the left faction of Yangming doctrines, even more radical thoughts, couldn't be admitted easily. Perception and acceptance about the left faction of yangming doctrines had been existed, though. The first perception about the left faction was confirmed in Heo, Kyun(許筠) and diverse intellectuals , such as Lee, Sik(李植), Seo, Jong-Tae(徐宗泰), Kim, Chang-Hyeop(金昌協), Kim, Chang-Heup(金昌翕) and so on, were identified to have perceived the left faction. They indicated that the left faction thoroughly had unfolded the theory confronted with that of Sung Confucianism. However, as confirmed in the indication of Seo, Hyeong-Soo(徐瀅修), Lee, Choong-ik(李忠翊) and Jung-jo(正祖), the left faction began to exercise influence on intellectuals from late in the 18th century. It is regarded that they couldn't accept the theory of the left faction as it was but received Kong-An school which applied the left faction's thoughts to literature as a substitute measure. It seems that Li, Zhuo-Wu(李卓吾) and Yuan, Hong-Dao(袁宏道)‘s thought were especially widely known. The influence of the left faction of the Wang Yangming school and Kong-An schoo needs to be confirmed further in the world of thoughts of the latter half of the 18th century.
강명관(Kang, Myeong Kwan) 동양한문학회(구 부산한문학회) 2011 동양한문학연구 Vol.32 No.-
박지원의 「열녀함양박씨전」은 과부가 개가하지 않고 수절(守節)하는 관습에 대한 비판으로 해석되어 왔다. 하지만 이 해석은 박지원의 사상과 작품을 지나치게 진보적으로 해석하려는 선입견의 산물로 여겨진다. 박지원의 문집에는, 남편이 죽자 따라 자살한 여러 여성의 전기(傳記)가 실려 있다. 그는 그런 여성의 행위를 긍정적인 것으로 판단하고 있다. 이런 작품들에서 여성의 수절을 긍정적인 행위로 판단했던 박지원이 「열녀함양박씨전」에서만 여성의 수절을 부정적으로 판단했다고는 할 수 없을 것이다. 박지원은 다만 여성이 남편의 사후 따라 죽는 행위의 사회적 확산에 대해서는 비판적이었다. 그는 「열녀함양박씨전」에서 여성이 굳이 죽음을 택하지 않아도, 열녀가 될 수 있다는 것을 보여주려고 했던 것으로 여겨진다. 「열녀 함양 박씨전」을 여성의 수절에 대한 비판으로 해석하는 것은, 박지원의 사유 속에서 중세의 국가이데올로기인 성리학(性理學)을 극복하려는 사유를 찾아내어, 조선후기 역사에서 근대로 향하는 자생적 길을 찾아내려는 근대주의적 태도에서 비롯된 것이다. 나는 전근대인(前近代人)인 박지원의 사유 속에서 존재하지도 않았던 ‘전근대를 비판하는 사유’를 찾는 태도, 곧 근대주의적 태도를 이제 철회해야 한다고 생각한다. 「열녀함양박씨전」를 재론한 것은 바로 이 때문이다. Park Ji Won's 『Yeolnyeo Hamyang Parksijeon』, which is a biography on a faithful women of the Hamyang Park clan, has been interpreted as a criticism about the custom that a widow maintains her integrity without remarriage. But the integration seems to have been made by a prejudice from excessively liberal analyses of Park Ji Won's thoughts and writings. His literal collection contains a few biographies on women who killed themselves after their husband died. Park Ji Won regarded those women's suicide as a positive, ethical act In this sense, it's unreasonable to judge that he was negative about a woman remaining faithful to her dead husband at least in 『Yeolnyeo Hamyang Parksijeon』, However, Park Ji Won criticized that women's suicide after the death of their husband were socially prevailing. In the biography on a faithful woman of the Hamyang Park clan, presumedly, Park Ji Won suggested that women could be fully faithful, though they kill themselves after their dead husband. Interpreting 『Yeolnyeo Hamyang Parksijeon』 as a criticism about women's maintenance of their integrity may be attributed to a modernist intent to show there's an intrinsic attempt to move from the pre-modern times, that is, the late Joseon period to the modern times. Contributing to the intent was one of Park Ji Won's reasons which was seemingly an orientation to overcome the Sung Confucianism, the national ideology of Joseon of the medieval times. This researcher thinks that it's time to throw away the modernist intent, or the attempt to find out a reason based on criticism about pre-modernity which didn't actually belong to Park Ji Won's thoughts. This is the very reason why the researcher reviewed 『Yeolnyeo Hamyang Parksijeon』 in this study.
강명관 ( Myeong Kwan Kang ) 한국한문학회 2015 한국한문학연구 Vol.0 No.57
Claims that the internal modernization of this country brought the development of Korean literature are not true. They were just made by requests from nationalism after the beginning of the 20th century. The asserted spontaneous modernization of Korean literature has been a logic that implicitly but naturally justifies the capitalist modern times. But actually, those times that we reached is not a utopia, but a hell of fire. Thus, the developmental view of history which is embedded within the theory of the internal development of Korean literature should be fully reviewed and criticized. This suggests it’s unreasonable to unconditionally ignore the pre-modern times from the perspective of the modern times. Literature of the pre-modern times should be treated as meaningful within the contexts of the same period. The pre-modern times needs to be considered as the storage of speculations which are required for transition to the capitalist modern times rather than as what has to be overcome or abolished. Here, importantly, works of pre-modern literature would be able to support that consideration. Of course, this should not be construed approving all aspects of the pre-modern times.
근대계몽기 문예운동의 시각 ; 근대계몽기 출판운동과 그 역사적 의의
강명관(Myeong Kwan Kang) 민족문학사학회·민족문학사연구소 1999 민족문학사연구 Vol.14 No.-
In the patriotic enlightment movement 1905 through 1910, the part of publication was very significant. It is because the enlightment of knowledge, education and language was the main issue of enlightment movement, and none of them was unrelated to the publication. The publication movement, which challenges to the exclusive structure of knowledge, dismantled the medieval horizon of knowledge production and distribution. The books of enlightment passion were mostly published from 1907 to 1909. This three-year period was the core part which can be called patriotic enlightment period. Patriotic intellectuals devoted their abilities for national modernization in this period, and the international information and national identity were constructed by their struggles. Such a change was also the result of the publication movement, and its raison d`e^tre.
강명관 ( Myeong Kwan Kang ) 한국고전문학회 2007 고전문학연구 Vol.32 No.-
Pansori novel exposes worldly desire plainly. ChunhyanJeon(春香傳), HeungboJeon(興夫傳), SimcheongJeon(沈淸傳) are works of worldly desire and express bald appetite, sexual desire, possessiveness. Those are profane in public discourse. Those can not be philologically expressed. Once expressed, exist only in the decadent and dark places. Hence, it is the language of subjects that can express those desires. The characters inside the novel wish those desires to make a reality while living in actuality those desires can not be satisfied. Only in fantasy, the unattainable desires can be satisfied. A gourd seed from the swallow, perfect Prince Charming Lee Mong-Ryong, the death and rebirth as a sovereign lady of Sim Chung. These are all fantasy. These fantasy belong to subjects, not to the ruling classes. However, the ruling classes had seen the existence of these desires and fantasy such suppression and criticism. Thus, the novel and ruling ideology had compromised. The brotherliness in HeungboJeon, the virtue in ChunhyanJeon, the filial conduct in SimcheongJeon. Those desires that can not be realized are decorated with the ruling ideology. That is to say, Pansori novel has inculcated the ruling ideology as ruling classes and has exposed and satisfied worldly desires that can not realized in actuality as subjects. Pansori novel was applied to the intersection between the desires of subjects and the ruling ideology.