http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
신상웅,윤래환,고낙영,변영재 한국정보통신설비학회 2019 한국정보통신설비학회 학술대회 Vol.2019 No.08
In this paper, we introduce the communication system available in shielding environment using surface-wave. Surface-wave communication system is possible using special antennas. The antennas also attenuate radiation waves but strengthen surface-waves. In experiment results, this communication system can work at 14m distance
辛相雄,조금현 中央大學校 韓國藝術硏究所 1988 中央大學校 藝術大學 創論 Vol.7 No.-
In this article, the Dialectical Realism is the literary criticism of Marxism before the KAPF accepts the Social Realism. This article aims at revealing the propulsive process in the Dialectical Realism of the KAPF through controversy. If the process of propulsive Dialectical Realism of the KAPF is arranged in good order, it is as follow. 1. Controversy over the content and form between Park. Young Hee and Kim, Ki Jin. 2. Controversy over the partysim between 'Seoul Headquarter' and 'Tokyo Branch'. 3. Controversy over the popularity between Kim, Ki Jin and Lim, Hwa. Through these controversy, the propulsive process on factors of the Marxism's literary criticism concept of the content and form, partyism, popularity-is divided into two trends. The one is to overemphasize 'superstructure' that did not go with the importance of 'the base', the other is that did not recognize the autonomy of 'superstructure' because they thought 'the base' important too highly. We can find that the former mistake is in examples of Kim, Ki Jin in the first controversy, 'Seoul Headquarter' in the second, and Kim, Ki, Jin in the last, and the mistake is Park, Young Hee, 'Tokyo Branch' and Lim, Hwa. We can also find the same mistake in these two aspects because they did not recognize the correlation between 'the base' and 'superstructure'. I think that the latter is nearer to the literary criticism of Marxism than the fomer. Because the latter devoted themseves to the movement for independence of the nation under the control of Japanese imperialism and had the thorough recognition on 'the base'.
辛相雄 중앙대학교 예술연구소 1991 中央大學校 藝術大學 創論 Vol.10 No.-
The Korean writers are naturally asked such a question as what kind of contribution to the unification of Korea have they established through the literary works of the divided country. It is because that the matters of contradiction of the division the peninsula, subjugation of it and realization of unification have been endlessly presented through the literary works of Korea(the South as well as the North) since the peninsula was divided into two parts. The literary works of North, which have been composured under the ideologies of antiimperialism and people-liberation are mostly concerned the matter of unification far today and the future, even though they are rooted on the partizan of anti-Japanese or the construction of a social country, while the Southern writers began to present their will of unification and subjugation of the division of the peninsula just through their literary works since the 1980's Now it seems that the writers' practical will to present the subjugation of the unification matters through their immanant ways and bitter pains like internal bleeding is overpassed the thought of subject matters in Korean literature.