미국의 저궤도위성 이동통신 주파수 이용제도

박학래,이정훈,Park, Hak-Rae,Lee, Jeong-Hun 한국위성정보통신학회 1994 위성통신과 우주산업 Vol.2 No.3

당진 지역 유학의 전개 양상에 관한 소고

박학래 ( Park¸ Hak Rae ) 한서대학교 동양고전연구소 2021 東方學 Vol.0 No.44

이 글은 기존에 당진 지역의 유학에 대한 검토가 전무한 상황을 고려하여 당진 지역의 유학적 전통을 사적인 흐름에 유의하여 정리한 것이다. 그리고 이를 통해 향후 지역학으로서 ‘당진학’ 연구 흐름에서 유학 전통에 관한 연구 활성화의 초석을 다지고자 하였다. 당진 지역은 백제 시대에 유학이 자리 잡은 이후, 고려 개창을 전후한 시기부터 주목할 만한 유학적 지식인이 배출되었으며, 고려 시대와 조선 시대를 관통하며 특기할 만한 유학자를 배출하였다. 그리고 여말선초에 불사이군(不事二君)의 절의 정신을 갖춘 유교적 지식인의 배출과 은거가 이루어진 이후 성리학적 학풍 하에서 지속하여 문무 관료를 배출하며 면면히 유학 전통을 이어 나갔다. 특히 16세기부터 당진을 지역적 배경으로 활동한 기호학계의 대표 학자인 안민학(安敏學)과 송익필(宋翼弼)이 활동하였을 뿐만 아니라 이안눌(李安訥) 을 비롯한 문장가들의 배출이 이어지면서 유학의 풍모가 다양해졌고, 18세기부터는 실학적 경향이 깃들면서 당진의 유풍은 더욱 다채로워졌다. 그리고 19세기 이후 근현대기에 이르기까지 당진은 항일 의병의 중심으로서 그 면모를 보다 명증하게 보여주었다. In the Dangjin area, Confucianism was established in the Baekje era, and since then, notable Confucian intellectuals have been produced from around the opening of Goryeo. And it has rooted Confucian tradition by producing notable Confucian scholars through the Goryeo and Joseon periods. Confucian intellectuals with loyal spirits at the end of Goryeo and early Joseon were produced and concealed in Dangjin area. Especially, from the 16th century, An Min-hak and Song Ik-pil, who were representative Confucian scholars of Kiho school who worked in Dangjin as a regional background, not only acted, but also the writers including Lee An-nul appeared. As a result, Confucianism in Dangjin has diversified. By the 18th century, the Confucianism of Dangjin area became more colorful as the actual Confucianism tended to be. And from the 19th century to the modern and contemporary period, the Dangjin area showed its aspect more clearly as the center of anti-Japanese righteousness. In this article, the Confucian traditions of Dangjin area were summarized in private flow, and as a regional study, the foundation of research on Confucian traditions was laid out in Dangjin.

대곡(大谷) 김석구(金錫龜)의 성리설(性理說) 연구

박학래 ( Hak Rae Park ) 고려대학교 민족문화연구원 2005 민족문화연구 Vol.43 No.-

This article examines a neo-confucian theory of Kim seok-ku (金錫龜, pen name : Daegok大谷), who was a pupil of great neo- confucian scholar of late Cho-sun period, Ki jeong-jin(奇正鎭, pen name : Nosa蘆沙). The Nosa school(蘆沙學派), comprised of neo- confucian scholars who followed Ki jeong-jin’s thoughts on neo- confucianism mainly lived inHo-nam(湖南)and western Yong-nam (嶺南) regions, had numerous debates about neo-confucian topics, such as li and chi(理氣), mind and nature(心性), knowledge and action(知行), government and seclusion(出處), with their mentor Ki jeong-jin. Furthermore, thanks to these debates, they could deepen their understandings on neo-confucianism and develop particular neo-confucian theories. So far, much works has been done on topics of Ki Jeong- jin’s neo-confuciantheories,but little hasbeen done on the Nosa school, inthe face of growing works on the contemporary other neo-confucian schools such as the Hwaseo school(華西學派), and theHanjuSchool(寒洲學派).In the present paper, we shall see how Kim seok-ku, evaluated as a Ki jeong-jin’s orthodox successor, succeeded and reinforced the superintendency of li in his neo- confucian theory. Especially, the virtue and vice problem under li monistic structure will be a focal point of this article.

해제(解題) : 『해동문헌총록(海東文獻總錄)』과 경와(敬窩) 김휴(金烋)

박학래 ( Hak Rae Park ) 고려대학교 민족문화연구원 2009 민족문화연구 Vol.50 No.-

This Article is a bibliographical introduction of Haedongmunheonchongnok 海東文獻總錄 written by Kim, Hyoo 金烋(1957~1638). Haedongmunheonchongnok is a significant masterpiece providing valuable information on the collections of writings published in Korean history and contains annotated bibliography of all kinds of compiled or written documents. The author, Kim, Hyoo not only examined and compiled each available book by himself but also scrutinized all the records related to book publications in almost all kinds of literatures transmitted. Then he completed a catalogue of books and put bibliographical explanation to each book. The number of books he included into the catalogue of books reaches up to approximately 670 and nearly all fields of study are evenly dealt with. This book was published first by phototypography in 1969. However, this book was the lack of quantity, is currently difficult to use this book. So published again sponsored by yeoheonhakyeonguhoe 旅軒學硏究會 in 2009. This book will be helpful to researchers, the field of Korean studies.

노사(蘆沙)의 기정진(奇正鎭)의 성리설(性理說)을 둘러싼 기호학계의 논쟁 -「외필(猥筆)」을 중심으로-

박학래 ( Hak Rae Park ) 고려대학교 민족문화연구원 2008 민족문화연구 Vol.48 No.-

At the end of the 19th century, Kiho畿湖 school notably started to differentiate into sub-schools. After mid-nineteenth century, the specification of Kiho school was accelerated and each sub-schools not only inherited the neo-confucian tradition, but also concretely differentiated their viewpoints on neo-confucianism . Furthermore, the difference frequently induced disputes which were raised by other sub-school members. The dispute in Eopil猥筆 which intensively reveals Ki, Jung-jin奇正鎭`s view on neo-confucianism in Rigiron 理氣論 standpoint, was also raised questions by Yeonjae sub-school scholars initially, and the dispute was spreaded to the whole Kiho school. It was a initial dispute that the sub-schools started to differentiated and this difference was risen to the surface by this dispute after 19th century. Moreover, it had considerably shaped the topography of the Kiho school of 20th century that the confrontations and solidarities among sub-schools on this dispute. Accordingly, the dispute on Ki Jung-Jin`s neo-confucianism, which was one of the main disputes in the 20th century, will be examined in terms of changes and developments of the dispute and main disputing points. By examining the origin and development of dispute, the aspect of expansion of subjects in the dispute will be revealed and the composition of the sub-schools in Kiho school will be confirmed as a result. Moreover, the viewpoint differences in the dispute among main scholars, for example Ki Jung-jin, and sub-schools will be identified. In addition, because the dispute was started and developed as basically Ki Jung-jin`s Igiron was recognized as a criticism on Yul Kok`s Rigiron, the difference in inheritance of Yul Kok`s doctrine among sub-schools in Kiho school can be revealed. As a result, this article will contribute to identify the differentiated aspect of inheritance of Yul Kok`s doctrine among the sub-schools of Kiho school.

봉서(鳳棲) 유신환(兪莘煥)의 철학사상(哲學思想) 연구(硏究)

박학래 ( Hak Rae Park ) 고려대학교 민족문화연구원 2011 민족문화연구 Vol.54 No.-

Specialization of Schools is one of the remarkable phenomena in Korean neo-Confucian academia in 19th century. In both the Kiho and the Youngnam lineages, literati formed their groups putting up a leading figure as their center. They took the lead in academic debates not only by suggesting various views on the previous theories of nature and principle, but also by representing academic trends distinguished from other schools through reinterpretations of the Zhuzi philosophy. Moreover, these literati groups established via specialization of schools actively respond to various problems raised by the turmoil from within and without. With paying attention to the transition mentioned above, this paper examines the philosophical thought of Bongseo Yu Sinhwan, one of the key figures in the Kiho lineage. Despite the fact that he succeeded to the orthodox line of the Nak School of the Kiho lineage, Yu has very flexible attitude having no blind belief in the theories of his own school. In addition to this, he established his own stance by accepting other academic trends via various routes. With paying a special attention to the real world, especially, he suggested his own view on diverse issues of the theories of nature and principle. Thus, I will investigate his philosophical thought by being mindful of his predecessors whose significant influences given to him. Moreover, I will inquire to his problematique with consideration of academic trends of official-scholars belonging to the Nak School in the midst of a circumstance that distinction between center and peripheries has been sped-up.

사회관계망과 한국 유학 연구 -근현대 유학자 사회관계망 구축에 유의하여

박학래 ( Hak Rae Park ) (사)율곡연구원 2013 율곡학연구 Vol.26 No.-

Social network theory and its analysis is one of the promising methodologies that contemporary researchers nowadays pay attention to in studying Korean Confucianism. This research methodology, which has been already generalized in social science, is based upon relational concept of man. In the methodology, an individual makes relationship with others within social network. The social network can be reproduced and maintained by behaviors of individuals. Moreover, the network formed by choices of individuals can influence their behaviors. Based upon this view, in a word, this method analyses a social structure as well as properties of individuals. This research methodology has been applied to Korean Confucianism at a beginning stage. The reason is because we have no systematic analyses and approaches to the method by lacking of sufficient data. This article examines social network theory and its analysis in relation to an established study on Korean Confucianism. By paying attention to individual researches taking the methodology, furthermore, I seek for applicability of this method to Korean Confucianism and delve into the result of it. The premise of my examination has basically a starting point that any scholars or schools in Korean Confucianism had never formed themselves independently. No matter how either an amicable or hostile attitude toward certain thought, formation of specific figures or schools is usually wrought at interactions not only between individuals but also between groups. Thus, I am convinced that the application of this method makes sense in analyzing social network of modern Korean Confucians.

여헌(旅軒) 장현광(張顯光)의 시대인식과 경세론(經世論)

박학래 ( Hak Rae Park ) 한국유교학회 2005 유교사상문화연구 Vol.22 No.-

간재학파(艮齋學派)의 학통(學統)과 사상적 특징 - 학문연원(學問淵源), 교유(交遊) 및 문인(門人) 분포(分布)를 중심으로-

박학래 ( Hak Rae Park ) 한국유교학회 2007 유교사상문화연구 Vol.28 No.-

This paper deals with the formation and development of Ganjae Jeonwoo`s academic standpoint by studying his academic background and social networks. Moreover the phase of Ganjae school is sketched by researching the formation and distribution of Ganjae school. This paper, therefore, mainly deal with Ganjae and the formation and development of his school. His academic origin, social networks, and activity and distribution of Ganjae school scholars will be revealed for embodying overall structure of Ganjae and his school. This research enable to shed light on the context of Ganjae`s activity, who lead neo-confucians and contented with any scholars, and his pupils`, who directly or indirectly participated in these contentions. Ultimately the structure of those day`s neo-confucian world of Korea will be clarified. Ganjae inherited Yulkok`s and other Kiho school key figures` sungri theory and governmental standpoint. Especially on human`s nature, he succeeded the theory of the major party of Kiho school, Nakron party. This inheritance was materialized by socializing with his teacher, Im hernhwea, and other Nakron party seniors and colleagues, and it is judged that this situation influenced in getting the hegemony in the Kiho school. Furthermore, this background helped him to be a key figure in the contestation in Kiho school and with Youngnam academic world. Along with the Ganjae`s embodied reputation as academic figure under the influence of Nakron party, his active lecturing and discussion rendered many scholars to be his pupil showed academic unity. Especially his pupils distributed all over the peninsular, so Ganjae school should be analysed as a national school rather than a Honam local school. This analysis based on analysis of Ganjae`s anthologies ``Gwanseonrok``, and ``Hwadoyeonwonrok`` and these books weren`t seriously examined in the academic circle until now.

간재(艮齋) 전우(田愚)와 간재학파(艮齋學派) 연구 현황 및 과제

박학래 ( Hak Rae Park ) 한국공자학회 2016 공자학 Vol.30 No.-

This paper is to summarize and analyze current research trends of Ganjae艮齋 Jeon, woo田愚(1841~1922), one of the representative scholars in modern Korean Confucianism, and his School and to suggest its prospect. Through the transition period to Modern Korea and Japanese colonial era, Ganjae and his School has been the representative Confucian group to succeed the tradition of Korean Confucianism and to be so far continued the academic line with the nation-wide influence. Researchers for Confucianism have studied Ganjae and his School For about the past 30years. Thus, I will sketch the landscapeof research on Ganjae and his students, which started to be highlighted after Japanese colonial era, and suggest its prospect for research on modern Korean Confucianism by examining some features of outcomes of studies on Ganjae and his School.