도심지 도로변 학교의 소음실태에 관한 연구

박재평,Park, Jae-Pyeong 대한건축사협회 1987 建築士 Vol.1987 No.1

회원작품 - 금정시민도서관

박재평,Park, Jae-Pyeong 대한건축사협회 1998 建築士 Vol.1998 No.2

회원작품 - 부산광역시 강서구청사

박재평,Park, Jae-Pyeong 대한건축사협회 2000 建築士 Vol.2000 No.8

적극적인 상법상 가장납입죄 적용의 필요성 - 무자본 M&A 과정에서의 가장납입 사례를 중심으로 -

朴宰平 ( Park,Jae-Pyoung ) 법조협회 2021 法曹 Vol.70 No.5

금융범죄 실무, 특히 무자본 M&A 과정에서 발생하는 신주 인수대금 납입에서는 상법 제628조 제1항의 가장납입으로 볼 수 있는 여지가 많고, 실제 다양한 실무사례가 쌓이고 있다. 즉 과학기술의 발달, 증권시장의 활성화 등 시대 변화에 따라 금융범죄도 진화하고 있는 바, 적극적으로 상법상 가장납입죄를 적용해야 하는 것은 아닌지 검토할 필요가 있다. 금융범죄 실무에서는 기존의 가장납입의 형태를 벗어난 다양한 모습들이 나타나고 있고, 이를 해결하기 위해서는 종전 판례나 관련 해석에서 벗어나 가장납입죄의 개념, 요건, 보호법익 등에 관한 새로운 해석 등이 필요하다. 상법 제628조 제1항의 가장납입죄는 회사의 자본금충실을 기본적으로 보호하고 그와 필연적으로 연결되는 회사채권자, 주주, 일반투자자들의 이익도 보호하고자 하는 사회적 법익에 관한 죄이고, 이는 시대 변화, 가장납입죄의 상법상 규정 체계, 입법자의 의도, 상법상 공시제도와 자본시장의 현실 등을 고려할 때 더욱 그렇다. 가장납입죄의 요건 중 특히 ‘납입 또는 현물출자의 가장’, ‘자본충실을 해할 의도’라는 해석에 있어서는 단순히 외견상 모습에 치우쳐 가장행위 여부를 판단할 것이 아니고, 가장납입이 이루어지게 된 전 과정을 살펴보고, 당사자들의 관계나 그 자금의 실제 사용처, 관련 약정 등을 종합적으로 검토해야 하며, 특히 무자본 M&A 과정에서 발생하는 자본시장질서 교란사범들의 납입에 대하여는 가장납입죄를 적극적으로 의율할 필요성이 있다. In practice of financial crimes, especially in the capiatlless M&A, there is much room for the disguised capitalization under Article 628 (1) of the Commercial Act. And in fact, various practical examples are accumulating. In other words, financial crime is also evolving according to the changes of the times, such as the development of science and technology and the revitalization of the stock market. It is necessary to examine whether or not the crime of the disguised capitalization should be actively applied under the Commercial Act. The crime of the disguised capitalization under Article 628 (1) of the Commercial Act is a crime concerning social and legal interests that fundamentally protects the fidelity of a company's capital and also protects the interests of corporate creditors, shareholders, and general investors that are inevitably connected thereto. This is especially true when considering the changes of the times, the system of regulations under the Commercial Act of the crime of the disguised capitalization, the intention of the legislator, the disclosure system under the Commercial Act and the reality of the capital market. Among the requirements of the crime of the disguised capitalization, in particular, in the interpretation of 'disguised capitalization or contribution in kind' and 'intention to undermine capital fidelity', it is not simply a judgment of whether a disguise act is carried out based on the outward appearance. It is necessary to review the entire process of making the payment for acquisition, and comprehensively review the relationship between the parties, the actual use of the funds, and related agreements. In particular, there is a need to actively applying the crime of the disguised capitalization under Article 628 (1) of the Commercial Act made by those who disrupt the capital market order that occur in the process of M&A without capital.

국내 가상화폐 거래소의 형사적 쟁점에 관한 연구 -국내 가상화폐 거래소 사기 사건을 중심으로-

박재평 ( Park Jae-pyoung ) 경상대학교 법학연구소 2023 法學硏究 Vol.31 No.1

탈중앙화, 분산거래장의 특징을 가진 블록체인 기술의 영향으로 가상화폐가 주목을 받고 있다. 2017년경부터 가상화폐에 대한 관심의 폭증으로 가상화폐를 거래하는 중개소가 많이 생겨났고, 그 과정에서 가상화폐 거래소의 사기 사건과 관련하여 신의칙상 고지의무 인정 여부에 관한 전원합의체 판결과 달리 판단한 1심 판단이 있어 이에 대한 검토가 필요한 상황이다. 가상화폐 거래소에서의 가상화폐 거래는 가상화폐 자체를 주고 받는 것이 아니고, 거래 매개수단인 ‘포인트’를 거래소로부터 부여받아 이를 이용하여 회원들간 거래를 하는 것이고, 이는 블록체인 기술과 무관하게 거래소가 자체 마련한 전산시스템상 생성·입력되는 것이기 때문에 거래소가 이를 임의로 이용할 위험성이 있을 수밖에 없다. 가상화폐 거래소가 관리자 계정을 운영하면서 이를 일반회원들과 달리 취급하였는데(실물 자산 입금 등이 없음에도 거래소의 관리자 게정에 포인트를 임의 부여), 거래소가 이를 일반회원들에게 고지하지 않은 것은 거래관계상 지켜야 할 신의칙상 고지의무를 다하지 않은 것으로 평가할 수 있고, 최근 전원합의체 판결에서도 이를 확인하였다. 가상화폐 거래소의 거래구조 특성상 국가의 규제가 아닌 자율에 맡기는 것은 위와 같은 위험성을 그대로 노출시키는 것이므로, 국가의 관여가 필요하고, 이를 위해 가장 효율적이고 공정하고 안전한 방법을 찾을 수 있도록 국가와 관련 부처, 거래소, 전문가, 일반시민 등이 모두 참여하는 자리가 마련될 필요가 있다. Due to the influence of a new technology called blockchain, which has the characteristics of decentralization, virtual currency is attracting attention, and there are many discussions about whether it can even be recognized as a financial product, currency, or certain property interests. Since around 2017, due to the explosion of interest in virtual currency, many virtual currency exchanges have been created, and in the process, court decisions are divided on whether to acknowledge fraud by acknowledging the disclosure obligation of virtual currency exchanges. Cryptocurrency trading at virtual currency exchanges is not exchanging virtual currency itself, but trading with 'points' received from the exchange. In other words, virtual currency transactions are conducted between members using it, regardless of block chain technology. There is a risk that the exchange will arbitrarily use it because it is randomly generated and entered by the exchange itself. While the virtual currency exchange operated the manager account, it was treated differently from general members. In other words, it is against the principle of good faith for a virtual currency exchange to arbitrarily assign points to an administrator's account and not inform general members of it even though it does not actually own the asset, and it was recently confirmed by the Supreme Court. Due to the nature of the trading structure of virtual currency exchanges, risk is exposed if it is left to autonomous rather than state regulation, so proper regulation by the state is required. To this end, it is necessary to prepare a place where the state, experts, and ordinary citizens can all participate.

정보저장매체 임의제출에 따른 압수절차에서의 쟁점

김재중(Kim, Jae-Jung),박재평(Park, Jae-Pyoung) 한양법학회 2023 漢陽法學 Vol.34 No.1

In these days a mobile phone comes into wide use and many crimes are frequently committed by means of mobile phone. For example many persons are prosecuted because of taking photographs in the subway etc by using a camera of mobile phone. So much evidence of a crime is stored in mobile phone. The recent Supreme Court decision, 2016 Do 348, ruled on the search and seizure of digital evidence by consent. The Supreme Courts 2016 Do 348 decision guaranteed the right to information privacy in that it strictly regulated the search and seizure procedures for digital evidence by consent. The main points of the Supreme Court decision can be summarized as follows. Firstly, the Supreme Court limited the scope of digital evidence confiscated by consent. In this regard. the Supreme Court ruled that those who consent to search and seizure of digital evidence may limit the scope of digital evidence confiscated. In addition, the Supreme Court stipulated procedures to be followed by investigative agencies in the process of confiscating digital evidence by consent. In addition, the Supreme Court limited the scope of digital evidence confiscated by consent to information related to the alleged crime. Secondly, where a third party such as a victim, etc., not a criminal suspect, voluntarily submits a data storage medium that the criminal suspect possesses and manages, even if such voluntary submission and resultant seizure of an investigative institution are legal, more restricted interpretation is required in that electronic information specifically and separately related with the facts information. Thirdly, the Supreme Court ruled that when an investigative agency conducts a search and seizure with the consent of the digital evidence submitter. the investigative agency should confiscate digital evidence only for digital evidence related to the fact of the crime. The Supreme Court also ruled that the right to participate should be guaranteed to the seized person in the process. If electronic information relevant to a suspicion of a crime is found by accident in the process of legally exploring electronic information relevant to facts constituting a suspicion of a crime before a seizure or search of electronic information is completed, an investigative institution should discontinue further exploration thereof, and, only when a warrant of seizure or of search is issued from the court with regard to the facts constituting a separate crime, the investigative institution can legally seize or search such information. Therefore, any evidence acquired by an investigative institution without a warrant of seizure or of search in relation to electronic information beyond the scope of electronic information subject to seizure in a data storage medium voluntarily submitted corresponds to illegally obtained evidence. The author hope to reflect this legal principles as soon as possible in National Assembly because our country is a Statute Law Country.

彌勒系寺刹의 空間構成에 關한 硏究

장성식,박재평,이재헌 청주대학교 산업과학연구소 1999 産業科學硏究 Vol.17 No.1

This study starts with the proposition that Buddhist architecture built through Buddhist belief. Thus, this study aims at revealing site layout and the spatial composition of Buddhist temples on Maitreya. As a result of this study analyzed by related Buddhist architecture with Maitreya belief, 1)the spatial composition of temples on Maitreya keeps related dogmas devotedly 2)holding intersecting axis with the main principle of planning 3)constructing a pagoda to symbolize the Buddha 4)because Buddhist statues are great and standing, it contrasts well with site of the horizontal.