http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
대인신뢰와 정부신뢰가 협력적 거버넌스 구축에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구
강애라 ( Aera Kang ) 사단법인 아시아문화학술원 2021 인문사회 21 Vol.12 No.2
본 연구는 대한민국 국민들의 신뢰와 협력적 거버넌스의 관계를 실증적으로 분석하는데 목적이 있다. 이를 위해 한국행정연구원의 신뢰와 거버넌스에 대한 국민인식조사 설문 데이터를 활용하여 구조방정식 분석을 실시하였다. 분석 결과, 대인신뢰와 정부신뢰가 모두 거버넌스 구축에 유의미한 긍정적인 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 한편, 정책의 협력·소통의 중요성 인식은 거버넌스 구축 정도에 유의미하며 부정적인 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 마지막으로 매개효과 분석 결과 대인신뢰와 정부신뢰가 정부의 거버넌스 구축정도에 부분매개를 하고 있는 것을 확인하였다. 본 연구 결과 대인신뢰, 정부신뢰, 정책의 협력·소통 중요성 인식과 거버넌스의 관계를 살펴보면서 모두 유의미한 관계를 나타내고 있는 것을 확인하였다. 향후에는 보다 다양한 독립변수를 사용하고 정교한 샘플링 작업을 통해 시계열적인 연구를 시도한다면 그 관계를 보다 다각화하여 시도할 수 있을 것이다. The purpose of this research is to positively analyze the relationship between trust and cooperative governance of the Korean people. To this end, a structural equation analysis was carried out using the survey questionnaire on trust and governance of the Korea Institute of Government Administration. The analysis shows that trust between people and government has a meaningful positive impact on governance building. On the other hand, it has become clear that the recognition of the importance of cooperation and communication in policy is meaningful and has a negative impact on the degree of governance building. Finally, it was confirmed that interpersonal trust and government trust mediate the level of governance building in the government based on the results of the analysis of the intermediary effect. As a result of this study, it was confirmed that the relationship between the recognition of the importance of interpersonal trust, government trust, policy cooperation and communication and governance is all meaningful. From now on, if we try time-series research using more diverse independent variables and elaborate sampling, we will be able to try to diversify the relationship.
姜仙(KANG Sun),禹悳燦(토론자) 고구려발해학회 2004 고구려발해연구 Vol.18 No.-
Koguryo had contacts with various non-Chinese people in north China as well as Chinese dynasties, which is natural considering Koguryo's geographical situation. Therefore, when one examines the foreign relationships of Koguryo, not only those with China but also those with non-Chinese people in the north have a significant meaning. In this paper, by examining how non-Chinese people including Xianbei, Qidan, and Rouran perceived Koguryo, I shall suggest the significance of Koguryo in East Asian history. In addition, I will investigate how the relationships between non-Chinese people in north China and Koguryo influenced on the international circumstances in East Asia. The contacts between Xianbei and Koguryo began since the common era. The actual contact was from when Murong Xianbei advanced to the Liaoxi region. According to Samguk sagi, Murong attacked Koguryo in 293 and 296 AD. The reason why Murong attacked on Koguryo is not certain. Considering the fact that Murong competed with other Xianbei tribes, Murong might have considered Koguryo as one of threatening powers. It is assumed that Murong attacked Koguryo in order to prevent Koguryo from interrupting internal conflicts among Xianbei tribes. As it moved to the 4th century, Koguryo competed with Murong in the Liaodong region. In 341, Murong established the Former Yan, and tried to expand its territory to the neighboring regions. In the next year, the Former Yan attacked Koguryo and seized Koguryo's capital. It is notable in that the purpose of the attack of the Former Yan was not on oppressing Koguryo, but cutting the ally between Koguryo and Yuwen tribe, and then finally destroying Yuwen tribe. Thus, the ultimate goal of the Former Yan was actually to gain the access to the Central Plain region. The Former Yan considered Koguryo as a threatening power, and the development of the nation depended on the success on the foreign policy against Koguryo The Qidan people who establised the Liao appeared in a written record from the late 4th century. According to Samguk sagi, Qidan invaded the border region of Koguryo in 378 in the 8th reign year of King Sosurim. King Kwanggaet' o campaigned against Qidan right after ascending to the throne. By the late 5th century, Qidan got influenced by the advance of Koguryo to the region of Hsiramulan river. In 479 when Koguryo and Rouran conspired together in dividing Didouyu At this time, oppressed by Koguryo, Qidan got incorporated into the Northern Wei. After the Sui dynasty established, some Qidan who were under Koguryo and Turks were absorbed into the Sui. Qidan got stronger by the late 6th century, and developed into the 10 tribes' confederation. The unification of the Sui brought the stability in Chinese territory However, a tension rose between Sui and Koguryo who competed for the hegemony in East Asia. As a war broke out between Sui and Koguryo, Qidan participated in a war as subsidiary troops. Qidan did not have an opportunity to have a political development or power expansion under the pressure of Koguryo and Chinese dynasties. Thus, it was impossible to act independently with its own identity. Rather, Qidari s existence depended on the political situations of powerful nations around it. In the Northern and Southern Dynasties, Rouran gained power in the northern region of China along with the Northern Wei. Rouran allied with Koguryo in order to restrain and isolate the Northern Wei. In addition, Rouran allied with Koguryo in dividing Didouyu region in the effort to prevent the Northern Wei from exchanging with other countries. Rouran considered Koguryo as one of powerful nations in East Asia, and allied with Koguryo to isolate the Northern Wei. The international circumstance in East Asia by that time showed the balance of power among the Northern and Southern Dynasties, Rouran and Koguryo. In summary, the non-Chinese people in north China considered Koguryo as an independent power different from