http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
오주영 慶星大學校 1990 論文集 Vol.11 No.1
In this paper I try to spell out the notions of so-called Presuppositions and Implicatures orderly, and propose to treat what we have called presuppositions as implicatures. In other words, I propose to treat semantic presuppositions as conventional implicatures in the semantic aspects of meaning and pragmatic presuppositions as conversational implicatures in pragmatic aspects of meaning. In section 0,I discuss the studies of important linguists of logicians, such as Russel(1905), Strawson(1950), Grice(1975)and Katz & Langendoen(1976);that is, the terms entailment, presupposition ad implicature which treat various aspects of sentences which seem to be preconditions for successful use of functioning of the sentences in speaking. In section,1,I discuss precisely the different aspects of so-called presuppositions, which can be divided into semantic and pragmatic presuppositions, and then summarize the definition of those terms. In addition, I discuss the problematic properties of presuppositions, like cancellability and projection problem, and then propose three kinds of solutions to them. In section 2,I discuss the notions of Grician implicatures, which can be divided into conversational and conventional implicatures; characteristics of those terms with some examples; his cooperative principle that we should observe the conversational maxims. In the final section, to solve these complex linguistic phenomina; truth or non-truth conditional aspects of meaning, I propose to divide up this heterogeneous collection ad to put it into two kinds of categories: conversational implicatures in case of depending upon contexts and conventional implicatures in case of relying on conventional forces of the words or the structures in an utterances.