http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
전의천(Jun Eui-Cheon),김석민(Kim Seog-Min) 조선대학교 지식경영연구원 2005 지역개발연구 Vol.10 No.2
We have to strengthen the following strategies to lead the international tourism of the center of the cultural city by enhance the value of Tourism Destination Image in Dorig-gu, Gwangju Metropolitan City First, Develope a source of tourism and a program for improving Regional Welfare. Second, Establish the foundation of Tourism and System of Eastern Tourist Source Third, Strengthen the high value of Tourist Industry by utilizing IT Forth, Strengthen the progressive(innovational) ability of the center of the local tourist development. Fifth, Strengthen the Development of Specialized Tourism Products and Marketing.
전의천(Jun Eui-Cheon),김석민(Kim Seok-Min) 조선대학교 지식경영연구원 2002 지역개발연구 Vol.7 No.2
The development of North Korea′s Kaesung Industrial Area will pave the way to the model for the both Koreas′ economic cooperation, benefit and prosperity. But Kaesung Industrial Area has many obstacles on its way to the successful model for both Koreas′ wexistance and the equilibrium development. For the successful development of the area and the successful entry of South Korea′s firms into the area, the reformation of systems relating to the both Koreas′ economic cooperation, joint entry of South Korea′s enterprises, guarantee of autonomy in manpower management, previous examination of the enterprises and the strategies for the sales networks of the new products should be made.
대중국 반덤핑조사 시 비시장경제체제 적용의 법원에 관한 분석적 고찰
전의천 ( Ui Cheon Jun ),김석민 ( Suk Min Kim ) 국제지역학회 2005 국제지역연구 Vol.9 No.2
중국은 개혁·개방의 성공적 추진을 통하여 경제시스템을 시장경제체제로 변화시키며 가장 역동적인 발전하고 있는 국가이다. 많은 연구자들 역시 현재 중국이 체제전환국 중에서도 가장 시장경제적 특징을 잘 나타내고 있는 것으로 간주하고 있다. 그러나 중국은 아직도 반덤핑 조사시 비시장경제체제 규정을 적용 받고 있는 관계로 시장경제체제의 수출업자들보다 더욱 심한 수출견제를 받고 있는 실정이다. 이에 중국 정부는 시장경제지위를 확보하기 위하여 외교적 압력과 보복적 반덤핑조치를 강화하고 있어 우리나라에게도 새로운 위협으로 다가오고 있다. 어떻든 비시장경제체제국으로부터의 수출품에 대한 반덤핑법의 적용에는 명백한 자의적 요인이 많다. 따라서 본 논문에서는 비시장경제체제에 대한 WTO 반덤핑협정상의 준거규정과 중국의 현황 및 미국, EU와 우리나라의 비시장경제체제 적용의 법원을 고찰하고, 이를 바탕으로 정책적 시사점을 도출하였다. 결과적으로 비시장경제체제 규정은 경제적인 문제일 뿐만 아니라 정치적이고 법적인 문제에 속한다. 따라서 韓·中 양국은 상호 보복적인 반덤핑관세의 부과는 국내가격을 상승시켜 국민경제 전체적으로 후생을 감소시키는 요인이 된다는 점과 그간 양국이 반덤핑제소의 최대 피해국이라는 점에서 인식을 같이하여 韓·中간의 반덤핑협정을 체결하기 위한 양국 정부차원의 논의가 절실히 요구된다. China is a dynamic country whose national economy is undergoing massive transformation at an accelerating rate. Many observers consider that the circumstances prevailing in the Chinese market are more characteristic of a market-based economy than they are of a non-market economy. China, however, continues to be treated by many of its trading partners as a non-market economy for purposes of antidumping investigations and this treatment has the clear potential to treat Chinese exporters less favorably than exporters of other market economies. Because antidumping actions are far more prevalent than countervailing duties and because the issue of non-market economy status has arguably more important ramifications for determining normal value than for subsidy assessment, the bulk of the discussion in this paper will focus on antidumping implications of the Sources for NME Provisions and problem. In the paper, we discuss: the implications of non-market economy treatment under the WTO rules; China`s current situation; how China is treated by USA, EU and Korea; and finally, Policy Implications for Korea. As a result, NME Provisions under Antidumping Investigation to China is not only economic problem, but also political and legal problem. So, China and Korea should have an active meeting for establishing the antidumping agreement under the understanding that China and Korea may be injured by the antidumping petition.
전의천(Jun Eui-Cheon),김석민(Kim Seog-Min) 조선대학교 지식경영연구원 2004 지역개발연구 Vol.9 No.1
This paper analyzes China's telecommunications policy-making mechanism, by drawing on institutional theory and bargaining theory. Key factors of shaping China's telecommunications policy are examined and the implementation of China's telecommunications policy in network development, competition, foreign direct investment, and regulatory restructuring is investigated. To achieve the transition toward pro-competitive telecommunications policy in China, it is necessary to dramatically reform its telecommunications policy-making mechanism. First of all, telecommunications legislation should be enacted to serve a legal ground on which the telecommunications policy rests. Second, the undue political and administrative interventions should be avoided. Third, the informal bargaining and lobbying should be replaced by transparent policy-making mechanisms. Fourth, the objectives of the telecommunications policy-making should be accountable for all the participants equally without discrimination. Finally, the values and norms embedded in the telecommunications policy-making mechanism should be clearly defined in the telecommunications legislation.
전의천(Eui-Cheon Jun) 한국항만경제학회 1999 韓國港灣經濟學會誌 Vol.15 No.-
In this world, Hub Ports have a great influence on the economy of a country. Our nation, Korea, is located in the center of North-East Area which is one of the most rapidly growing districts in the world This means that Pusan and Kwangyang are very advantageous in developing them as central ports for the international transportions of goods in view of their port situation. For Pusan and Kwangyang to be actively faced with the current port situation and to be grown as Hub Ports, they have to accomplish the following projects: ① The active development plan for the Hub Ports by national and local government ②The share of port roles and the specialization of port function ③The active inducement of transhipment carge ④ The establishment and management of the free ports and free trade area ⑤ The formation of the general transportion bases and the traffic networks ⑥ The improvement of ports harmonized with environment.