http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
( Vikesh Vij ),( Rahul Yadav ),( Jeevan Kankaria ),( Raj Kamal Jenaw ) 대한간학회 2018 춘·추계 학술대회 (KASL) Vol.2018 No.1
Aims: Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) and cholecystectomy as a single-stage treatment of choledocholithiasis have been shown to be superior when compared to the two stage management. Decompression after supra-duodenal choledochotomy is common practice as it reduces the chance of bile leaks. We conducted a randomized comparative study to compare the feasibility and outcomes in patients undergoing biliary stent insertion versus T-tube drainage following LCBDE via choledochotomy. Methods: The study involved 64 patients with choledocholithiasis, half of which underwent biliary decompression after LCBDE using biliary stent and in the other half T-tube was used. Results: Patients in the stent group had significantly shorter operative time, lesser post-operative complications, lesser hospital stay and earlier return to normal activity (P<0.001). Conclusions: In our study, we found there is a significant reduction in length of hospital stay and morbidity for patients that have ante-grade biliary stent decompression of the CBD post laparoscopic choledochotomy when compared to T-Tube drainage. This implies that ante grade biliary stent insertion is likely to reduce costs and increase overall patient satisfaction.