http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
The Coral Reef Environmental Crisis: Framing Attitudes, Prioritizing Issues, and Finding Consensus
Bärbel G. Bischof 한국주관성연구학회 2009 Journal of Human Subjectivity Vol.7 No.2
This work applies Q‐methodology towards environmental issues, specifically the coral reef conservation “crisis.” It delineates attitudes, perceptions, and foundations of coral conservation science in the context of the social construction of the coral reef conservation crisis by examining the scientifically‐grounded statements that define conservation debates. Participants were made up of members of the coral reef science and conservation professional network and included academic faculty, researchers, park management officials, and staff of a variety of organizations whose goal is reef conservation, research or management. The Q‐sample (n=36) was structured around the core debates over the causes of reef health decline and strategies of mitigation, both recent and long‐running, that consistently appear in the academic literature, conference sessions, and to a lesser extent, the general media. Three factors were isolated: The characteristics of factor 1 embody a globally based perception of the hf he‐environment feedback system. ef hes must respond to the global environment that happens both because of natural and he‐made actions, and blame on hf he causation is partial. Factor 2 also has a global worldview, however is far more pessimistic, attributing all blame on hf hes as the disruptors of the balance in the hf he‐environment feedback system. Factor 3 was distinguished by its focus on hf he population growth as the prinmey problem. Strong and intense contention was prevalent in the conusats over causes and effects of acidification and ocean warming and delegation of blame and causation of deterioration associated with global change.
Accelerated SCC Testing of Stainless Steels According to Corrosion Resistance Classes
( M Borchert ),( G Mori ),( M Bischof ),( A Tomandl ) 한국부식방식학회 2015 Corrosion Science and Technology Vol.14 No.6
The German Guidelines for stainless steel in buildings (Z. 30. 3-6) issued by the German Institute for Building Technology (DIBt) categorizevarious stainless steel grades into five corrosion resistance classes (CRCs). Only 21 frequently used grades are approved and assigned to these CRCs. To assign new or less commonly used materials, a large program of outdoor exposure tests and laboratory tests is required. The present paper shows theresults of stress corrosion cracking (SCC) tests that can distinguish between different CRCs. Slow strain rate tests (SSRT) were performedin various media and at different temperatures. CRC IV could be distinguished from CRC II and CRC III with a 31. 3 % Cl- as MgCl2 solutionat 140 °C. CRC II and CRC III could be differentiated by testing in a 30% Cl- as MgCl2 solutionat 100 °C.