http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
Grant Allen’s The Woman Who Did : A Critique on Eugenics and New Womanhood
( Kam¸ Kyeong Yeon ) 동국대학교 영어권문화연구소 2014 영어권문화연구 Vol.7 No.2
This paper, which makes available the forgotten pictures and previously unnoticed complexites drawn from articles, introduces aspects of the work of a neglected naturalist and evolutionist writer of the late nineteenth century in Victorian era. In particular, this paper focuses on Allen's analysis of the social construction of marriage and his concern of the future race and the concomitant issue of motherhood and social progress. On the issue of recognizing and validating women's role as mothers and entitling them public recognition as a social contributor, Allen is in line with early feminists known as eugenic feminists such as Sarah Grand and Frances Swiney. As to the mechanism of evolution, however, Allen differed from their view in that he regarded nature as a driving force whereas eugenic feminist saw human control as the key note in the evolutionary process. Such tension is witnessed in Allen's New Woman Novel, The Woman Who Did (1895) in which the protagonist Herminia seeks women's emancipation through her task of mothering premised on eugenic ideology. Ironizing Herminia's failure and her death, Allen calls into question the practicability of the discourse constituting the eugenic project. Drawing on the theories on evolution and Richardson's concept of “eugenic love”, this paper examines social implication in Herminia's maternal agenda and investigates the condition of her project which is already doomed to fail.
Hwa-Jin Lee,Keon Yeop Kim,Jong-yeon Kim,Sin Kam,Kyeong Soo Lee,Jung Jeung Lee,Nam Soo Hong,Tae-Yoon Hwang 대한예방의학회 2022 예방의학회지 Vol.55 No.4
Objectives: This study evaluated the response in Daegu, Korea to the first wave of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic according to a public health emergency response model. Methods: After an examination of the official data reported by the city of Daegu and the Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, as well as a literature review and advisory meetings, we chose a response model. Daegu’s responses were organized into 4 phases and evaluated by applying the response model. Results: In phase 1, efforts were made to block further transmission of the virus through preemptive testing of a religious group. In phase 2, efforts were concentrated on responding to mass infections in high-risk facilities. Phase 3 involved a transition from a high-intensity social distancing campaign to a citizen participation–based quarantine system. The evaluation using the response model revealed insufficient systematic preparation for a medical surge. In addition, an incorporated health-related management system and protection measures for responders were absent. Nevertheless, the city encouraged the participation of private hospitals and developed a severity classification system. Citizens also played active roles in the pandemic response by practicing social distancing. Conclusions: This study employed the response model to evaluate the early response in Daegu to the COVID-19 pandemic and revealed areas in need of improvement or maintenance. Based on the study results, creation of a systematic model is necessary to prepare for and respond to future public health emergencies like the COVID-19 pandemic.