RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      검색결과 좁혀 보기

      선택해제

      오늘 본 자료

      • 오늘 본 자료가 없습니다.
      더보기
      • 基本權의 第3者的 效力에 관한 硏究 : 基本權保護義務 理論과 關聯하여

        손성평 大田大學校 大學院 2003 국내석사

        RANK : 247631

        This Article aims to study the theories and judical precedents in Germany and United States of America concerning the problem of Drittwirkung. In Germany, the way of settlement of this problem developed through many theories. So to speak it has been treated as a problem of constitutional interpretation. So, it is the main argument whether constitutional Fundamental Rights has direct effect against private activities or not. However, in united States of America, it is settled that constitutional Fundamental Rights has no direct effect against Individual Rights . In order to protect constitutional Fundamental Rights against private invasion, several individual Rights are conceived as Governmental activities. The two situations in which constitutional standards are applied to private action are these. The cases in which government is supportively involved in private action by allocating aid, granting power, influencing private person to carry government objectives, enforcing Fundamental Rights by judical action or regulating Individual Rights are the first. And the cases in which private individuals have assumed government power or functions even without formal government involvement are the second. All the state organs are authorized to exercise their power, and it is also the duty to check the violations of other organs. They exercise their power and check each other. The Korea Constitutional Court usually checks the unconstitutionality of a law only when the law is clearly unconstitutional It can't pronounce a law unconstitutional when it has only some defects. It should respect the legislating power of the Congress, because it is composed of the representatives of the people. The fundamental rights can be guaranteed by the efforts of the state as well as the appropriate efforts of individuals. The state is an important protector of individuals rights. The Congress shall make law to concretize the fundamental right, and the other organs shall exercise their power to guarantee the individual rights. But the more we points the importance of the state in the guarantee of individual rights, individual rights become more dangerous because of the abuse its power. We should be aware of the danger of the abuse or misuse of the power of a state

      연관 검색어 추천

      이 검색어로 많이 본 자료

      활용도 높은 자료

      해외이동버튼