RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      검색결과 좁혀 보기

      선택해제

      오늘 본 자료

      • 오늘 본 자료가 없습니다.
      더보기
      • 『國民文學』 소재 소설에 나타난 ‘국민화’ 연구 : '신생활'의 이상과 균열을 중심으로

        カミヤ, ミホ 韓國外國語大學校 大學院 2009 국내박사

        RANK : 247343

        This thesis focus on a concept of 'nationalization (kookmin-hwa)' appeared in the novels and the discussions of the magazine, National Literature(Kook-min munhak) which published in early 1940s. Harootunian explains that there were two kinds of forms of modernism at the same time for the Japanese modern times period. One was a 'modern life' which was going to receive western culture positively, and the other was a 'new life' which was going to trying unify tradition and daily life. In the end of 1930's, the 'new life' which established by Japan was a theory to aim at the 'contemporary age', however, it broke off the 'modern life' and divided into the two kinds of times. The 'new life', in other word 'Contemporary life' demanded the use of national language as a only common language and it aimed at the life that prepared for war. Such a tendency is just reflected on the discussion and the novels. On the nationalization magazine, discussions were held to examine the problem that focused on that situation, and Korean and Japanese intellectuals attended it and exchanged their opinions. If we examined in detail the agenda of these discussions, we can understand the matter which the Korea literary world should solve. The agendas taken up on these discussions were the specialty of the Korea literature, the issue of creation in national language(kokugo) and the subject to keep new 'national feelings' alive for creation. Judging from a flow of the times, the subject of concern of these discussions and the tendencies are classified in three kinds; Japan-Korea unification(naisen-ittai) and nationalization, war and mobilization, and a failure for the colonial policy and cracks of imperialism. Such a tendency also appeared in these novels in the same way. The aspect of Korean people's nationalization were possible to be examined from a viewpoint of the discovery of the 'new life' through the works of Lee Seok-hoon and Jung In-taek. On the other hand, Japanese novelist drawn the aspects that 'national feelings' was going to be tempted from the Japanese side in a process of Japan-Korea unification, or the aspect that a Korean was going to choose the direction positively by oneself. In case of AOKI, Hiroshi, and a Korean writter from a farm village internalize the Japanese logic comparatively easily and was unconscious of 'modern life' and 'new life' and did not distinguish it, but wrote the work which affirmed 'nationalization' by Japan positively. After the outbreak of the Pacific war, the creation that focused on daily life, war and the mobilization had been released. To begin with, TANAKA Hidemitsu released the work to introduce a concept of the war literature demands to Koreans to become a 'nation' through the work which also teaches a concept of the opposite 'unpatriotic person' or aimed at Koreans themselves becoming a 'nation', and a lot of work which was going to become self-colonization were created. And internalization of the Japanese logic and the distance before making it his' was described as the intellectual of the Korean reflected on the work of Jung In-taek. A fret of the intellectual who was going to advance earlier than another person oozed out from his work. However, the state that failed in new life is also drawn by a novel carried by National Literature. Lee Seok-hoon shows the flow of the times toward the 'new life' from a 'modern life' in his novels. He drew this process in a motif that the Korean intellectuals made an effort to acquired new thought but failed after all, and he abandoned city life which meant 'new life', and emigrated to Manchuria, where was an uncivilized area. The Korean intellect Choi Jae-so drew the sorrow of the old generation from a viewpoint called the generation of 'modern life'. Both of the Korean and Japanese writers were trying to draw the doubt for 'new life' from the Japanese novelists by describing a manner of avoiding the armed forces call, and the interchange of a Korean high school student and a Japanese teacher. As for the intellectuals all the members those who participated in 'National literature' were not flattery always-like in the situation. They began to hold doubt in 'new life' because military gains were not desirable, so the intellectuals who were along the Japanese logic reached abandonment of 'nationalization'.

      연관 검색어 추천

      이 검색어로 많이 본 자료

      활용도 높은 자료

      해외이동버튼