大學運動選手의 人間關係 行動 分析 硏究 = Analysis of Interpersonal Relation Behavior of College Athletes

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

This study aims at showing the sociality of interpersonal behavior by analyzing interpersonal relation. For the purpose, we used FIRO-B method consisted of 54 items developed by Schutz of the University of California with the object of Individual sports, Team sports and College students.
We statistically tested mean and standard deviation dotained from three groups and produced compatibility by analyzing interpersonal relation behavior.
Here are conclusions,
1) Expressed inclusion behavior shows that there is only difference between sex, but it is not influenced by sports parttcipation types. Therefore women groups are usually higher than men groups in expressed inclusion behavior.
2) Wanted inclusion behavior shows that there is meaningful difference between groups in P＜.001 level but no statistically between groups in P＞.05 level.
3) Expressed control behavior shows that there is meaningful difference between sex in P＜.001 level but no statistically between groups in P＞.05 level.
4) Wanted control behavior shows that there is meaningful difference between sex in P＜.001 level and between groups in P＞.05 level. Therefore it has an effect on difference between sex and sports participation types, too.
5) Expressed attectoin behavior shows that there is meaningful difference between sex in P＜.001 level but no statistically between groups in P＞.05 level.
6) Wanted attection behavior shows that there is meaningful difference between sex in P＜.001 level but no between groups in P＞.05 level. This means there is only difference between sex but it is not influenced by sports participation types. Usually women groups are higher than men groups in expressed attection behavior.
7) Originator of the Inclusion behavior shows that there is no statistically meaningful difference between both sex and groups in P＞.05 level. This means it is not influenced by between sex and sports participation tupes.
8) Originator of the control behavior shows that there is no statistically meaningful difference between both sex and groups in P＞.05 level. This means it is not influenced by both of groups.
9) Originator of attection behavior shows that there is no statistically meaningful difference between both sex and groups in P＞.05 level. This means it is not influenced by originator.
10) Interchange of the inclusion behavior shows that there is meaningful difference between sex in P＜.00.1 level but no statistically between groups in P＞.05 level.
11) Interchange of the control behavior shows that there is statistically meaningful difference between sex in P＜.001 level and between groups in P＞.05 level. Therefore this means it is influenced by both sports participation types and sex.
12) Interchange of the attection behavior shows that there is meaningful difference between sex in P＜.001 level but no statistically between groups in P＞.05 level.
13) In result of analyzing compatibility for originator behavior, inclusion behavior shows expressed competitive non-compatibility in each groups, and control behavior and attection behavior show wanted non-attection non-compatibility(value), thus complementary function is reduced.
14) The analysis result of compatibility for interchange shows that, showing the absolute value of zero level in all groups, the results of interchanges in 3 behaviors (inclusion, control, attection) expressed behavior and wanted behavior are high.
15) The result of compatibility for reciprocal shows that the attection behavior show striking absolute value in behavior domain of interpersonal relation crossed by between groups and between sex, the other groups show distinguished compatibility, too.
To sum up, Inclusion, Control, Affection behavior in expressed and wanted Interpersonal Relation behavior have an effect on very meaning sports sociality because of high relation to between total or sex,- but it shows that there will be some sociality change on between groups. However, the control behavior and its related interchange show each different aspect between atheletes who make desirable relationship and college students. This means that they have atendency to improve and adjust sociality power in the persent state of things more than make a new challenge. Team sports groups show interpersonal relation better than the other group by compatibility analysis result. Therefore team sports groups will have an effect on sports activity for the better through social relationship.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• 目次 = ⅰ
• 第1章 緖論 = 1
• 第1節 硏究의 必要性 및 目的 = 1
• 第2節 硏究問題 = 3
• 第3節 硏究의 制限點 = 4
• 第2章 理論的 背景 = 5
• 第1節 人間關係의 槪要 = 5
• 第2節 集團와 行動特性 = 9
• 第3節 Sports 集團의 人間關係 適應機能 = 12
• 第4節 FIRO-B 理論 = 13
• 第3章 硏究方法 = 20
• 第1節 硏究對象 = 20
• 第2節 調査道具 = 21
• 第3節 分析內容 = 21
• 第4節 資料處理方法 = 22
• 第4章 結果 및 論議 = 23
• 第1節 結果 總括 = 23
• 第2節 能動的 및 受動的 行動에 대한 3個行動(包容, 統制, 愛情)의 性別 및 集團間 有意性 檢證 = 24
• 第3節 創始性에 關한 3個行動(包容, 統制, 愛情)의 性別 및 集團間 有意性 檢證 = 40
• 第4節 相互交換性에 關한 3個行動(包容, 統制, 愛情)의 性別 및 集團間 有意性 檢證 = 46
• 第5節 創始性 行動에 관한 兩立性 分析 = 53
• 第6節 相互交換性에 관한 兩立性 分析 = 56
• 第7節 互惠性에 관한 兩立性 分析 = 60
• 第5章 結論 = 63
• 參考文獻 = 67
• ABSTRACT = 70
• 부록 (설문지) = 73