대학행정조직에 있어서 사무직원의 역할인식에 관한 연구 = (A) study on the cognition of the role of the official in organization of the national university

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

I. Introduction
The problems of University is take a very importarnt part in Korea Society, and The importance of administration of University becomes larger and larger.
Organization of university adminstration is double-sided organization which consist of professores and officials, and it contains many problemes because the faculties actually manage the university administration till now.
In organization of university administration, The faculties' cognition is expressed in administrative behaveor and it has great influcence on instruction and researching acts.
The purpose of this study is findirg the officials' way or thinking on university administration and ploblemes in pertorminy the role, and then suggestiny the imptoved way.
II. Planning and Analysis of sample, contents and data.
In this study, the sample is limoted to the officials in National University.
I collect 267 officials randomly in Chung Buk, Chon Nam, Kang Won, and Pusan National Universities by proportional stratified sampling method.
I plan the questionaire sheet in 34 numbers of questionaire which consist of the character of University administration, the peculiarity of organization of University administration, the state and role of officials, the role structive and role conflict of the officials and correct role performance of the officials.
I try to analize the data by cross-check the inter relationship and tendency of each questionaire with frequency and per-centage.
And the degree of significance of interrelation-ship of each questionaire is checked in value of X2 in 5% of level of significance.
III. The Problems of role-preformance of the official in national University.
1. The officials' way of thinking on university adminstration show tendency of control and strictness in role-performing and administrative efficency first principle caused by power-centered bureaucratism and authoritive culture of administration.
2. Orgnization in university administration is double-sided organization which consist of professors and officials, so it has problems of management cansed by contrastive ways of thinking between the democratic and normative university organization, and bureaucrative and stratified administrative organization.
3. It showes that officials' role-performing area should be enlarged, and it is an obstacle to selfcontrolment in university administration and effective management of university system.
4. The peculity of university administration is not considered in selection and appointment of the officials, and the vacant positicns are filled up with irregular officials' and so the good quality service is impossible.
5. The officials, have low morale and the rate of satisfaction in role-performance is low.
6. The officials, have high role-conflict because their role structure is not built yet, and they have poor cognition of role, and they have no police of personnel administration, and they have bad organic atmospher.
7. The total evaluation system and the useful committe system on university administration are poor.
IV. Conclusion and suggestions.
1. The cognition of the role of the university administration should be change into corrective way through such programs as education and training systems for the officials.
2. The role-performance areas of the officials, should be gradually reduced to center on furction of means and services. And the democratic and normative decisions made by professors should be respected.
3. The Standard of qualification or the officials, should be heightened, and their quality should be refined through education and training system, and the role and the irregular officials, should be limitted, and they should be substituted by regular officials.
4. The organic atmospher which the officials can perform their role with pride should be built through give the officials motive product element such as recognition of their value of existence, humanly treatment, taking a role in system of making decision, and improved personnel administration principle.
5. To specialize the university administration, the roles of the orgaizations for planning and evaluation, such as Progressive Planning Part, should be enlarged. And many commite systems should be become lively and vice-principle for administration should be required and the officials of university should be specialized.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• 목차
• 第一章 序論 = 1
• 第一節 硏究의 目的 = 1
• 第二節 硏究의 方法 및 範圍 = 4
• 第二章 大學行政과 事務職員 = 5
• 第一節 大學行政의 本質과 特性 = 5
• 1. 大學行政의 體制的 位置와 構造 = 5
• 2. 大學行政의 本質과 特性 = 13
• 3. 大學行政組織의 特殊性과 組織風土 = 17
• 第二節 大學事務職員의 位置와 機能 및 役割遂行範圍 = 26
• 1. 大學事務職員의 位置 = 26
• 2. 大學事務職員의 役割遂行範圍 = 26
• 3. 大學行政組織에 있어서 事務職員의 役割構造 = 28
• 第三章 設問調査 및 結果分析 = 31
• 第一節 謁査의 設計 = 31
• 第二節 大學行政에 대한 事務職員의 意識構造 = 37
• 第三節 大學事務職員의 機能과 役割遂行 姿勢 = 42
• 第四節 大學事務職員의 役割構造와 役割葛藤 = 46
• 第五節 大學行政의 專門化와 組織內의 人間關係 = 55
• 第四章 大學事務職員의 役割遂行上 問題點과 改善方案 = 64
• 第一節 大學行政에 대한 認識과 行政行態의 變化 = 64
• 第二節 大學行政風土의 刷新과 動機誘發 = 65
• 第三節 大學事務職員의 專門化 = 66
• 第四節 大學事務職員의 役割構造 定立과 役割葛藤의 解消 = 68
• 第五節 人間關係改善을 通한 組織一體化 = 70
• 第五章 結論 = 72
• 參考文獻 = 75
• 設周紙 = 81
• 英文抄錄 = 91