전직 관료 영입이 기업성과에 미치는 영향: 산업에 따른 효과성 분석

국문 초록 (Abstract)

[연구목적] 지금껏 전직 관료 영입과 기업성과 간의 관계를 다룬 다양한 연구가 진행되어 왔다. 하지만, 선행연구들은 서로 다른 연구방법과 연구대상으로 인해 혼재된 결과를 보임으로써 지속적인 의문을 증폭시키고 있다. 이에 본 연구는 두 가지 산업을 비교 분석함으로써 전직 관료 영입과 기업성과 간의 보다 명확한 관계를 관찰하고자 하였다.
[연구방법] 연구를 위해 1998년부터 2017년까지 총20년의 연구기간을 선정하고 의약품 및 의료기기 제조업 189개 기업과 화학산업에 포함된 화학물질 및 화학제품 제조업 136개 기업의 데이터를 수집하여 연구를 진행하였다.
[연구결과] 연구결과, 취약한 제도적 환경으로 평가되는 의료산업에서는 전직 관료 영입이 기업성과에 정(＋)의 영향을 미치는 것으로 관찰되었으며 비교적 안정적인 제도 환경으로 평가되는 화학산업에서 전직 관료 영입이 기업성과에 유의미한 관계가 없는 것으로 관찰되었다.
[연구의 시사점] 본 연구는 그동안 전직 관료 영입과 기업성과 간의 혼재된 연구결과를 설명하는데 기여할 수 있을 것으로 예상된다. 특히, 기업이 속해 있는 산업의 제도적 환경에 따라 전직 관료 영입이 기업성과에 미치는 영향이 다를 수 있음을 시사하고 있다.

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

[Purpose] So far, various studies have been conducted on the relationship between recruiting former bureaucrats board and corporate performance. However, prior studies have amplified persistent questions by showing mixed results from different methods and subjects. Thus, the study sought to observe a clearer relationship between the two major variables through comparative analysis of two different industries.
[Methodology] To fulfill the aim of the research, we covered the corporate performances for 20 years from 1998 to 2017. The data were collected from 189 pharmaceutical/medical companies, and another 136 chemical related companies.
[Findings] In the medical industry, which is regarded as a unstable institutional environment, the recruitment of former bureaucrats has been observed to have a positive effect on corporate performance, and in the chemical industry, which is considered to be a relatively stable institutional environment, the recruitment of former officials has no significant relationship to corporate performance.
[Implications] The study is expected to contribute to explaining the mixed results of the research between recruiting former bureaucrats and corporate performance. In particular, it suggests that the impact of recruiting former bureaucrats on corporate performance may vary depending on the environment of the industry to which the company belongs.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• 요약
• Ⅰ. 서론
• Ⅱ. 이론적 배경 및 가설 설정
• Ⅲ. 연구방법
• Ⅳ. 연구결과
• Ⅴ. 결론 및 토의
• 참고문헌
• Abstract

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 신미화, "한·중·일 의료기기산업의 비교우위 및 무역패턴 분석" 한국무역학회 36 (36): 25-56, 2011

2 윤대엽, "제도적 재량권과 산업정책의 정치: 1997년 외환위기 이후 산업관련 법제의 변화를 중심으로" 한국정치연구소 21 (21): 195-222, 2012

3 이종찬, "제도변화에 대한 이론적 고찰: 후기 신제도주의의 쟁점과 한계" 한국정치학회 48 (48): 163-184, 2014

4 최성진, "정치연관이 기업성과에 미치는 영향에 관한 실증 연구: 중국의 상장 중소기업을 중심으로" 한국전략경영학회 14 (14): 45-65, 2011

5 손현순, "일반의약품 허가제도의 국가간 비교 및 발전 방향" 한국임상약학회 15 (15): 127-138, 2005

6 이우천, "의료기기산업 클러스터 육성방안 연구: 원주의료기기산업 발달과정 고찰을 중심으로" 한국보건경제정책학회 13 (13): 55-70, 2007

7 정대용, "소기업 기업가의 네트워킹활동과 그 효과성의 매개효과가 기업성과에 미치는 영향" 한국경영교육학회 29 (29): 147-166, 2014

8 김용기, "대기업 규제정책과 기업의 정치전략: 공정거래법 사례 연구" 한국경영학회 20 (20): 33-58, 2016

9 박준호, "기업의 정치적 연계가 기업 성과에 미치는 영향 환경동태성의 조절효과 중심으로" 한국경영학회 48 (48): 493-513, 2019

10 김영수, "기업가정신 연구 분류 체계에 대한 탐색적 연구: 기업가적 행동의 결과 중심 메타분석" 한국경영교육학회 33 (33): 483-500, 2018

11 민혁기, "글로벌 환경규제의 현황과 시사점" 산업연구원 139 (139): 40-49, 2010

12 임태균, "관료출신 사외이사의 선임여부, 선임여부의 변화 및 선임비율에 따른 기업가치의 차이 - 유가증권시장을 중심으로 -" 한국경영학회 44 (44): 1305-1326, 2015

13 이창민, "관료 출신 사외이사는 기업에 기여하는가? 금융회사 사외이사를 중심으로" 한국재무관리학회 34 (34): 159-195, 2017

14 김인호, "[하일라이트] 한미 제약 FTA 와 키랄 의약품 개발" 25 (25): 354-359, 2007

15 Wang, H., "What is the benefit of TMT’s governmental experience to private－owned enterprises? Evidence from China" 28 (28): 555-572, 2011

16 Bearfield, D. A., "What is patronage? A critical reexamination" 69 (69): 64-76, 2009

17 Li, H., "The role of managers’ political networking and functional experience in new venture performance : Evidence from China’s transition economy" 28 (28): 791-804, 2007

18 Hocking, R. R., "The regression dilemma" 12 (12): 497-527, 1983

19 Esterling, K. M., "The political economy of expertise: Information and efficiency in American national politics" University of Michigan Press 2009

20 Nordhaus, W. D., "The political business cycle" 42 (42): 169-190, 1975

21 Henisz, W. J., "The institutional environment for multinational investment" 16 (16): 334-364, 2000

22 Pfeffer, J., "The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective" Harper & Row 1978

23 Selling, T. I., "The effects of business environment and strategy on a firm’s rate of return on assets" 45 (45): 43-52, 1989

24 Sun, P., "The contingent value of corporate political ties" 26 (26): 68-82, 2012

25 Almeida, H., "The cash flow sensitivity of cash" 59 (59): 1777-1804, 2004

26 Scott, W. R., "The adolescence of institutional theory" 493-511, 1987

27 Hannan, M. T., "Structural inertia and organizational change" 149-164, 1984

28 Oliver, C., "Strategic responses to institutional processes" 16 (16): 145-179, 1991

29 Cohen, J., "Statistical power analysis" 1 (1): 98-101, 1992

30 Cohen, J., "Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, 12" Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc 1988

31 Tihanyi, L., "State ownership and political connections" 45 (45): 2293-2321, 2019

32 민인식, "Stata 패널데이터분석" 지필미디어 2012

33 민인식, "Stata 고급패널데이터분석" 지필미디어 2012

34 Nahapiet, J., "Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage" 23 (23): 242-266, 1998

35 조재영, "SME Internationalization and Performance: The Role of Ownership Structure" 한국경영학회 47 (47): 1285-1317, 2018

36 Blanes i Vidal, J., "Revolving door lobbyists" 102 (102): 3731-3748, 2012

37 Hillman, A. J., "Resource dependence theory : A review" 35 (35): 1404-1427, 2009

38 Getz, K. A., "Research in corporate political action : Integration and assessment" 36 (36): 32-72, 1997

39 Dean, T. J., "Pollution regulation as a barrier to new firm entry : Initial evidence and implications for future research" 38 (38): 288-303, 1995

40 Hillman, A. J., "Politicians on the board of directors : Do connections affect the bottom line?" 31 (31): 464-481, 2005

41 Faccio, M., "Politically connected firms" 96 (96): 369-386, 2006

42 Leuz, C., "Political relationships, global financing, and corporate transparency : Evidence from Indonesia" 81 (81): 411-439, 2006

43 Keim, G. D., "Political environments and business strategy : Implications for managers" 51 (51): 47-53, 2008

44 Faccio, M., "Political connections and corporate bailouts" 61 (61): 2597-2635, 2006

45 Mattozzi, A., "Political careers or career politicians?" 92 (92): 597-608, 2008

46 He, Y., "Performance implications of nonmarket strategy in China" 24 (24): 151-169, 2007

47 Randøy, T., "Ownership structure, founder leadership, and performance in Norwegian SMEs : implications for financing entrepreneurial opportunities" 18 (18): 619-637, 2003

48 Kim, H., "Ownership structure and the relationship between financial slack and R&D investments : Evidence from Korean firms" 19 (19): 404-418, 2008

49 Porter, M. E., "On competition" Harvard Business Press 2008

50 Bonardi, J. P., "Nonmarket strategy performance : Evidence from US electric utilities" 49 (49): 1209-1228, 2006

51 Peng, M. W., "Managerial ties and firm performance in a transition economy : The nature of a micro－macro link" 43 (43): 486-501, 2000

52 Eisenberg, T., "Larger board size and decreasing firm value in small firms" 48 (48): 35-54, 1998

53 Lu, J. W., "Intra－and inter－organizational imitative behavior : Institutional influences on Japanese firms’ entry mode choice" 33 (33): 19-37, 2002

54 Hillman, A., "International variation in the business－government interface : Institutional and organizational considerations" 20 (20): 193-214, 1995

55 Baron, D. P., "Integrated strategy : Market and nonmarket components" 37 (37): 47-65, 1995

56 North, D., "Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance" Cambridge University Press 1990

57 Leiponen, A., "Innovation objectives, knowledge sources, and the benefits of breadth" 31 (31): 224-236, 2010

58 Huergo, E., "How does probability of innovation change with firm age?" 22 (22): 193-207, 2004

59 Marano, V., "Home country institutions and the internationalization－performance relationship : A meta－analytic review" 42 (42): 1075-1110, 2016

60 Yermack, D., "Higher market valuation of companies with a small board of directors" 40 (40): 185-211, 1996

61 Lester, R. H., "Former government officials as outside directors : The role of human and social capital" 51 (51): 999-1013, 2008

62 Allison, P. D., "Fixed effects regression methods in SAS" 2006

63 Greene, W., "Fixed and random effects in stochastic frontier models" 23 (23): 7-32, 2005

64 Audretsch, D. B., "Firm growth and innovation" 43 (43): 743-749, 2014

65 Qian, Y., "Federalism as a commitment to reserving market incentives" 11 (11): 83-92, 1997

66 Chu, W., "Family ownership and firm performance : Influence of family management, family control, and firm size" 28 (28): 833-851, 2011

67 Kotabe, M., "Examining the complementary effect of political networking capability with absorptive capacity on the innovative performance of emergingmarket firms" 43 (43): 1131-1156, 2017

68 Granovetter, M., "Economic action and social structure : The problem of embeddedness" 91 (91): 481-510, 1985

69 Baysinger, B. D., "Domain maintenance as an objective of business political activity : An expanded typology" 9 (9): 248-258, 1984

70 Mikkelson, W. H., "Do persistent large cash reserves hinder performance?" 38 (38): 275-294, 2003

71 Khwaja, A. I., "Do lenders favor politically connected firms? Rent provision in an emerging financial market" 120 (120): 1371-1411, 2005

72 Hitt, M. A., "Direct and moderating effects of human capital on strategy and performance in professional service firms : A resource－based perspective" 44 (44): 13-28, 2001

73 Faccio, M., "Differences between politically connected and nonconnected firms : A cross country analysis" 39 (39): 905-928, 2010

74 King, G., "Designing social inquiry: Scientific inference in qualitative research" Princeton university press 1994

75 Hillman, A. J., "Corporate political strategy formulation : A model of approach, participation, and strategy decisions" 24 (24): 825-842, 1999

76 Keim, G. D., "Corporate political strategy and legislative decision making : A review and contingency approach" 11 (11): 828-843, 1986

77 Hillman, A. J., "Corporate political strategies and firm performance : indications of firm－specific benefits from personal service in the US government" 20 (20): 67-81, 1999

78 Lawton, T., "Corporate political activity : A literature review and research agenda" 15 (15): 86-105, 2013

79 Siegel, J., "Contingent political capital and international alliances : Evidence from South Korea" 52 (52): 621-666, 2007

80 Meyer, J., "Centralization, fragmentation, and school district complexity" 186-201, 1987

81 Margaritis, D., "Capital structure, equity ownership and firm performance" 34 (34): 621-632, 2010

82 Zheng, W., "Buffering and enabling : The impact of interlocking political ties on firm survival and sales growth" 36 (36): 1615-1636, 2015

83 Cheng, S., "Board size and the variability of corporate performance" 87 (87): 157-176, 2008

84 Funk, R. J., "Beyond nonmarket strategy : Market actions as corporate political activity" 42 (42): 32-52, 2017

85 Ridge, J. W., "Beyond lobbying expenditures : How lobbying breadth and political connectedness affect firm outcomes" 60 (60): 1138-1163, 2017

86 Greif, A., "A theory of endogenous institutional change" 98 (98): 633-652, 2004

87 Falk, R. F., "A primer for soft modeling" University of Akron Press Akron 1992