RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재 SCOPUS

      A corpus-based analysis of conceptual metaphors with BITE and CHEW in English and Korean

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A108081093

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      The purpose of this research is to examine conceptual metaphors with BITE and CHEW in two typologically different languages, English and Korean (BITE and CHEW in English and MWUL- ‘BITE’ and SSIP- ‘CHEW’ in Korean). There has been some researc...

      The purpose of this research is to examine conceptual metaphors with BITE and CHEW in two typologically different languages, English and Korean (BITE and CHEW in English and MWUL- ‘BITE’ and SSIP- ‘CHEW’ in Korean). There has been some research on conceptual metaphors with EAT and other words that depict general eating processes; however, little attention has been paid to conceptual metaphors with words that describe specific processes of eating events. This study first discusses key grammatical properties of BITE and CHEW and their conceptual metaphors in English and Korean based on an analysis of authentic corpus data. This study then shows that although the two verbs BITE and CHEW in each language can license some metaphors in common, overall they are more different than similar in terms of metaphor types, frequency distribution patterns, and preferred syntactic and semantic properties. This study further shows that although the pairs of the English verb and its Korean counterpart (i.e., BITE in English vs. MWUL- ‘BITE’ in Korean and CHEW in English vs. SSIP- ‘CHEW’ in Korean) can induce some conceptual metaphors in the same manner, their conceptual metaphors are also more different than similar with respect to metaphor types, frequency distribution patterns, and strong collocates. Taken together, the findings suggest that it is crucial to explore authentic uses of conceptual metaphors with specific verbs involved in eating processes in more detail across different languages, making use of attested corpus data, and that in this way we can make a significant contribution to the body of literature on conceptual metaphors.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 Lakoff, George, "Women, fire, and dangerous things : What categories reveal about the mind" The University of Chicago Press 1987

      2 Taljard, Elsabé, "The semantics of eating in Afrikaans and Northern Sotho:Cross-linguistic variation in metaphor." 29 (29): 224-245, 2014

      3 Wierzbicka, Anna, "The linguistics of eating and drinking" John Benjamins Publishing Company 65-90, 2009

      4 Yamaguchi, Toshiko, "The linguistics of eating and drinking" John Benjamins Publishing Company 173-193, 2009

      5 Newman, John, "The linguistics of eating and drinking" John Benjamins Publishing Company 1-26, 2009

      6 Song, Jae Jung, "The linguistics of eating and drinking" John Benjamins Publishing Company 195-228, 2009

      7 Næss, Åshild, "The linguistics of eating and drinking" John Benjamins Publishing Company 27-43, 2009

      8 Davies, Mark, "The Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA)"

      9 최영주, "The Concept EAT as a Metaphorical Source in English" 대한언어학회 25 (25): 1-21, 2017

      10 Deignan, Alice, "The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought" Cambridge University Press 280-294, 2008

      1 Lakoff, George, "Women, fire, and dangerous things : What categories reveal about the mind" The University of Chicago Press 1987

      2 Taljard, Elsabé, "The semantics of eating in Afrikaans and Northern Sotho:Cross-linguistic variation in metaphor." 29 (29): 224-245, 2014

      3 Wierzbicka, Anna, "The linguistics of eating and drinking" John Benjamins Publishing Company 65-90, 2009

      4 Yamaguchi, Toshiko, "The linguistics of eating and drinking" John Benjamins Publishing Company 173-193, 2009

      5 Newman, John, "The linguistics of eating and drinking" John Benjamins Publishing Company 1-26, 2009

      6 Song, Jae Jung, "The linguistics of eating and drinking" John Benjamins Publishing Company 195-228, 2009

      7 Næss, Åshild, "The linguistics of eating and drinking" John Benjamins Publishing Company 27-43, 2009

      8 Davies, Mark, "The Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA)"

      9 최영주, "The Concept EAT as a Metaphorical Source in English" 대한언어학회 25 (25): 1-21, 2017

      10 Deignan, Alice, "The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought" Cambridge University Press 280-294, 2008

      11 Lakoff, George, "Metaphors we live by" The University of Chicago Press 1980

      12 Deignan, Alice, "Metaphor and corpus linguistics" John Benjamins 2005

      13 Kövecses, Zoltán, "Metaphor : A practical introduction" Oxford University Press 2010

      14 Agyepong, Dorothy Pokua, "Literal and meta phorical usages of ‘eat’ and ‘drink’ in Akan" 26 (26): 62-78, 2017

      15 Ye, Zhengdao, "Eating and drinking in Mandarin and Shanghainese: A lexical-conceptual analysis" Macquarie Centre for Cognitive Science 375-383, 2010

      16 Newman, John, "Eating and drinking as sources of metaphor in English" 6 (6): 213-231, 1997

      17 Stefanowitsch, Anatol, "Corpus-based approaches to metaphor and metonymy" John Benjamins 63-105, 2006

      18 Charteris-Black, Jonathan, "Corpus approaches to critical metaphor analysis" Palgrave MacMillan 2004

      19 Deignan, Alice, "Contemporary corpus linguistics" Continuum 9-31, 2009

      20 Kim, Jong-Bok, "Conceptual metaphorical extensions of ‘eat’ and ‘drink’ in English and Korean: A usage-based approach" Association for Computational Linguistics 873-881, 2018

      21 최영주, "Comparison of the Concept EAT as a Metaphorical Source in Korean and English" 미래영어영문학회 22 (22): 285-306, 2017

      22 김해연, "A Corpus-Based Metaphor-Theoretical Study of Literal vs. Figurative Meanings of Some Korean Lexical Items" 사단법인 한국언어학회 (79) : 135-158, 2017

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2023 평가예정 해외DB학술지평가 신청대상 (해외등재 학술지 평가)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (해외등재 학술지 평가) KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2012-09-18 학회명변경 영문명 : Center for the Study of Language and Information -> Institute for the Study of Language and Information KCI등재
      2010-05-17 학회명변경 한글명 : 언어연구소 -> 언어정보연구소
      영문명 : Center for the Study of Language -> Center for the Study of Language and Information
      KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2009-03-23 학술지명변경 외국어명 : 미등록 -> Linguistic Research KCI등재후보
      2009-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2007-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.42 0.42 0.45
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.4 0.43 1.123 0.1
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼