RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      정신보건법의 주요 쟁점 조항에 대한 선진국과의 사례 비교 = Comparison of Major Procedures of Korean Mental Health Law with Other Developed Countries

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A76521310

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Objectives The Mental Health Act is an initiative aimed at changing and shaping mental health services and protecting human rights of persons with mental disorders. Since the Mental Health Act was legislated in 1995, four amendments have been made acc...

      Objectives The Mental Health Act is an initiative aimed at changing and shaping mental health services and protecting human rights of persons with mental disorders. Since the Mental Health Act was legislated in 1995, four amendments have been made according to the issues that arose from public concerns. However, there are still many debates about the human rights protection of the mentally iII. This study aimed to provide information regarding major aspects of the Mental Health Act by comparing them among several developed countries.
      Methods Current Mental Health Acts of the state of Michigan in the United States, Scotland in England, the state of Victoria in Australia, and Japan were reviewed. Issues regarding the Korean Mental Health Act were collected from seminar materials, news media contents, and mental health professionals
      Results The definition of subjects in Korean Mental Health Act was more inclusive than other countries and was derived from a medical classification of mental illness. Family members or guardians were granted important responsibilities for deciding the involuntary admission of mentally ill patients in Korea and Japan. In Western countries, Mental Health Review Tribunals or courts have the primary responsibility for important decisions about mentally ill patients. The regulation of immediate dis-
      charge after request by voluntarily admitted patients was not enacted in all countries except Korea. The mandatory procedure for involuntary admission in Western countries includes an individual case review with personal interview by a Mental Health Review Tribunal or court.
      Conclusion The Korean Mental Health Act appears to meet the basic standards of Guidelines from international organizations. Our traditional culture and inherent health systems seem to influence the legal regulation of mental health service and might be related to the problems of human rights protection of mentally ill patients in Korea.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 가토 히사다케, "현대윤리에 관한 15가지 물음" 서광사 1999

      2 서미경, "정신장애인의 인권보장과 제한에 관한 연구" 한국사회복지학회 55 : 231-254, 2003

      3 서미경, "정신보건시설에서의 정신장애인 권리침해에 관한 연구 - 국가인권위원회 진정사례를 중심으로 -" 한국정신보건사회복지학회 29 (29): 330-367, 2008

      4 Royal College of Psychiatrist, "White Paper on the Reform of the Mental Helath Act 1983: Letter from the Chiar of the College's Public Policy Committee" Royal College of Psychiatrist 2001

      5 "WHO"

      6 "Vitorian Legislation and Parliament Documents. Mental Health Act"

      7 Gallagher IIIB, "The Sociology of Mental Illness" Prentice Hall 2002

      8 "The Civil Law of Korea"

      9 Ovadia T, "Steps on the road to a national mental health policy" 1 : 1991

      10 Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission, "Report of the National Inquiry into the Human Rights of People with Mental Illness" 1993

      1 가토 히사다케, "현대윤리에 관한 15가지 물음" 서광사 1999

      2 서미경, "정신장애인의 인권보장과 제한에 관한 연구" 한국사회복지학회 55 : 231-254, 2003

      3 서미경, "정신보건시설에서의 정신장애인 권리침해에 관한 연구 - 국가인권위원회 진정사례를 중심으로 -" 한국정신보건사회복지학회 29 (29): 330-367, 2008

      4 Royal College of Psychiatrist, "White Paper on the Reform of the Mental Helath Act 1983: Letter from the Chiar of the College's Public Policy Committee" Royal College of Psychiatrist 2001

      5 "WHO"

      6 "Vitorian Legislation and Parliament Documents. Mental Health Act"

      7 Gallagher IIIB, "The Sociology of Mental Illness" Prentice Hall 2002

      8 "The Civil Law of Korea"

      9 Ovadia T, "Steps on the road to a national mental health policy" 1 : 1991

      10 Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission, "Report of the National Inquiry into the Human Rights of People with Mental Illness" 1993

      11 Bloch S, "Psychiatric Ethics, 3rd Edition" Oxford University Press 1999

      12 van Opstal JA, "Proposal for a treatment law based on the Scottish model" 49 : 719-728, 2007

      13 General Assembly resolution of United Nation 46/119, "Principles for the Protection of Persons with Mental Illness and the Improvement of Mental Health Care"

      14 Boerma B, "One year of the Act: a Tribunal view of the first twelve month of the NSW Mental Health Act 1990" 15 : 435-448, 1992

      15 Ministry of Government Legislation, "Ministry of Government Legislation; c1997-2007"

      16 "Michigan, United States. Mental Health Code, Michigan State"

      17 Doyal L, "Mental health legislation should respect decision making capacity" 331 : 1467-1469, 2005

      18 Watson A, "Mental health courts and the complex issue of mentally ill offenders" 52 : 477-481, 2001

      19 "Mental Health(Care and Treatment)(Scotland) Act"

      20 Suh TW, "Mental Health Policy and Law in Korea" 123 : 42-56, 2007

      21 World Health Organization, "Mental Health Legislation & Human Rights"

      22 Shin YJ, "Legislative Study on the improvement of human rights for people with mental illness" National Human Rights Commission of Korea 2006

      23 "Korean Mental Health Act"

      24 Chung IW, "Judgement of Continuing Hospitalization in the Treatment of Chronic Mentally-Ill Patients" 38 : 1282-1292, 1999

      25 "Japan. The Law concerning Mental Health and Welfare for Mentally Disabled Persons"

      26 Chodoff P, "Involuntary hospitalization of the mentally ill as a moral issue" 141 : 384-389, 1984

      27 Richardson G, "Doctors on tribunals. A confusion of roles" 176 : 110-115, 2000

      28 Jenkins R, "Developing National Health Policy" Psychology Press 2002

      29 Jonathan DP, "Cure and Control: Medical Model Dominance and Empowerment-based Philosophy in American Mental Health Care" University of California 2002

      30 The Central Mental Health Supporting Committee, "Business report of the Central Mental Health Supporting Committee (2007)" Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs 2007

      31 President's New Freedom Commission on Mental Health, "Achieving the Promise: Transforming Mental Health Care in America"

      32 Lee DM, "A Study on the Treatment of Mentally Disorder Criminal" 25 : 397-420, 2007

      33 Jang YM, "A Study on the Commitment of the Mentally Ill" 1-141, 1995

      34 Wards of the State, "A National Sutdy of Public Guardship" University of Kentucky 2005

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2023 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (재인증) KCI등재
      2018-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      2016-12-01 평가 등재후보 탈락 (계속평가)
      2015-12-01 평가 등재후보로 하락 (기타) KCI등재후보
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2006-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2005-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼