Background : Both PCNA and Ki-67 have been used as marker for cellular proliferation. The drawback of Ki-67 antibody in immunohistochemistry was that it can be labelled only on fresh tissue, however, MIB1 is a newly developed Ki-67 antiboc which can b...
Background : Both PCNA and Ki-67 have been used as marker for cellular proliferation. The drawback of Ki-67 antibody in immunohistochemistry was that it can be labelled only on fresh tissue, however, MIB1 is a newly developed Ki-67 antiboc which can be labelled on formalin-fixed tissue. Objective : The purpase of the present study is to compir the stainability of the Ki-67 antibody with that of the ICNA antibody on formalin-fixed, para fin embedded tissues. Methods : Using MIE1, the newly developed Ki-67 antibody and PC10(PCNA antibody), speci mens of squamous cell carcinoma(SCC), Bowens disease(BL), actinic keratosis(AK) and basal cell epithelioma(BCE) were stained by one hour immunocytial, mistry using a Microprobe immuno/DNA stainer. Results : The labelling indices (LI) of MIB1 were 82.6%, 37.4%, 38.3% & 81.1% respectively in SCC, BD, AK & BC, while the LI of PC10 were 77.69%, 26.6% & 64.4%. The labelled cells of both antibodies differed in distribution patterns on turmor tissues. Conclusion : MIBI cain be used to be an alternative m.rl r for proliferating cells. MIBI PC10, when used together, will be mutually compensatory the study of proliferating cell kinetics.
(Kor J Dermatol 1995;33(3): 453-458)