RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      엘리어트와 포스트모더니즘  :  《황무지 The Waste Land》의 포스트모던성을 중심으로 = Eliot and Postmodernism: Postmododernity in The Waste Land

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A2005319

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      The Waste Land is generally considered to be a quintessentially modernistic poem written by a representative modernistic poet, T.S.Eliot. Or is it? Even though the poem was written during the so-called modernistic period by one of the most typical mod...

      The Waste Land is generally considered to be a quintessentially modernistic poem written by a representative modernistic poet, T.S.Eliot. Or is it? Even though the poem was written during the so-called modernistic period by one of the most typical modernistic poets, it does not necessarily follow that it is or should be a modernistic poem. This poem defies this kind of easy categorization and stands on its own peculiar characteristics. This is the main reason why critics have not so far reached a consensus on how to deal with it.
      In this respect, we can try to read it from a perspective different from the one conventionally practised so far. Concepts like postmodernism and postmodernity, then, can serve us very well for this purpose. Especially the period-neutral concept like postmodernity will be a very useful tool in reading this poem.
      What makes this poem different from other modernistic poems is that it does not have a narrative, or a story, to tell. This means that it does not seem to have a unified organizing principle, generally understood as telos, because it is wholly composed of fragments. In this sense, this poem demands a new reading strategy. Of all things, the feature of seeming purposelessness of this poem makes it very postmodernistie, because postmodernity (and postmodernism, too) literally thrive on the meaninglessness and fragmentariness of the world in general and of the work of art itself in particular. This aspect of meaninglessness, then, leads us to note the decentered nature of the poem. The Waste Land, a mere "heap of broken images", does not have a center in its structure in the conventional sense of the term.
      We cannot, therefore, say for sure who the original author/authors is/are: Eliot/Pound/ the writers of the quoted fragments/ and/or the reader of the text as the poem. The original writer/writers can and/or cannot be either one of these and, at the same time, all/none of these. In this confused state of affairs, not a single definite meaning can be fixed on this text as to its story-line, because the text itself is connected with other texts ad infinitum.
      In this regard, even though The Waste Land is written in the so-called modernistic period by a well-known modernistic poet, it definitely demands to be read as a postmod ernistic text.

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼