RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      The Discourse Marker well in EFL Textbooks

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A106336763

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      The purpose of this study is to analyze the discourse marker (DM) well in five English as a foreign language (EFL) textbooks published by famous overseas publishing companies, and to examine whether the usage of the DM well found in these books reflec...

      The purpose of this study is to analyze the discourse marker (DM) well in five English as a foreign language (EFL) textbooks published by famous overseas publishing companies, and to examine whether the usage of the DM well found in these books reflects the various functions it fulfills in the discourse of native speakers as analyzed by linguists. Six functions of well were selected based on common usage, without duplication of any of the functions of well proposed in previous work.
      These six functions are turn management marker, face threat mitigation marker, insufficiency marker, frame markers, repair marker, and collaborative marker. As a result, the frequencies of turn management markers, face threat mitigation markers, and insufficiency markers were found to be higher, whereas the frequencies of repair markers, and collaborative markers were significantly lower. In addition to using textbooks, additional classroom activities could also allow English teachers to teach discourse markers to learners. For example, after first being shown a movie clip that contains the use of DMs of native speakers, students will be able to discuss how the particular DMs function in conversations.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 임민경, "영어회화교재에 나타난 담화표지어 비교" 한양대학교 대학원 2014

      2 서경희, "‘Sustainable Disagreement’ : Well as a Discourse Marker in Crisis Negotiations" 한국사회언어학회 23 (23): 131-160, 2015

      3 Heritage, J., "Well-prefaced turns in English conversation : A conversation analytic perspective" 88 : 88-104, 2015

      4 Aijmer, K., "Understanding pragmatic markers: A variational pragmatic approach" Edinburgh University Press 2013

      5 Schegloff, E. A., "The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation" 53 (53): 361-382, 1977

      6 Hansen, M., "The function of discourse particles:A study with special reference to spoken standard French" John Benjamins 1998

      7 Jucker, A. H., "The discourse marker well : A relevance-theoretical account" 19 (19): 435-452, 1993

      8 Heritage, J., "Talk in action: Interactions, identities and institutions" Wiley-Blackwell 2010

      9 Schourup, L. C., "Rethinking well" 33 (33): 1025-1060, 2001

      10 Levinson, S. C., "Pragmatics" Cambridge University Press 1983

      1 임민경, "영어회화교재에 나타난 담화표지어 비교" 한양대학교 대학원 2014

      2 서경희, "‘Sustainable Disagreement’ : Well as a Discourse Marker in Crisis Negotiations" 한국사회언어학회 23 (23): 131-160, 2015

      3 Heritage, J., "Well-prefaced turns in English conversation : A conversation analytic perspective" 88 : 88-104, 2015

      4 Aijmer, K., "Understanding pragmatic markers: A variational pragmatic approach" Edinburgh University Press 2013

      5 Schegloff, E. A., "The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation" 53 (53): 361-382, 1977

      6 Hansen, M., "The function of discourse particles:A study with special reference to spoken standard French" John Benjamins 1998

      7 Jucker, A. H., "The discourse marker well : A relevance-theoretical account" 19 (19): 435-452, 1993

      8 Heritage, J., "Talk in action: Interactions, identities and institutions" Wiley-Blackwell 2010

      9 Schourup, L. C., "Rethinking well" 33 (33): 1025-1060, 2001

      10 Levinson, S. C., "Pragmatics" Cambridge University Press 1983

      11 Cuenca, M. J., "Pragmatic markers in contrast : The case of well" 40 (40): 1373-1391, 2008

      12 Fraser, B., "Pragmatic markers" 6 (6): 167-190, 1996

      13 Fischer, K., "Methods for the description of discourse particles: Contrastive analysis" 18 (18): 853-861, 1996

      14 McCarthy, M., "Language as discourse:Perspectives for language Teaching" Longman 1995

      15 Lakoff, R., "Issues in linguistics: Papers in honor of Henry and Renée Kahane" University of Illinois Press 453-467, 1973

      16 Östman, J. O., "Impromptu speech: A symposium" The Research Zastitute of the Abo Akadeni Foundation 147-177, 1982

      17 Redeker, G., "Ideational and pragmatic markers of discourse structure" 14 (14): 367-381, 1990

      18 Aijmer, K., "English discourse particles : Evidence from a corpus" John Benjamins 2002

      19 Norrick, N. R., "Discourse markers in oral narrative" 33 (33): 849-878, 2001

      20 Müller, S., "Discourse markers in native and non-native English discourse" John Benjamins 2005

      21 Schiffrin, D., "Discourse markers" Cambridge University Press 1987

      22 McCarthy, M., "Discourse analysis for language teachers" Cambridge University Press 1991

      23 Owen, M., "Conversation and Discourse" Cromm Helm 99-116, 1981

      24 Schourup, L. C., "Common discourse particles in English conversation" Garland 1985

      25 Schegloff, E. A., "Beginning to respond : Well-prefaced responses to wh-question" 42 (42): 91-115, 2009

      26 Fraser, B., "An approach to discourse markers" 31 (31): 931-952, 1990

      27 Sul, Bun-Young, "A study on the discourse markers in high school English conversation textbooks and ELT books" Chonnam National University 2010

      28 An, Jee Hee, "A discourse-analytic perspective on well in Korean and international English textbooks" Hankuk University of Foreign Studies 2018

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2022 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2019-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2016-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2012-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2008-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2006-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.53 0.53 0.6
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.6 0.64 0.983 0.16
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼