燕山君의 슬픔과 분노 = Anger and Sadness of Yeonsangun

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Yeonsangun has been regarded as a figure who was lack of logical reason. In short, he was a man of rich emotion rather than reason. In addition, he had a fatal defect in his characteristics caused by deficiency of maternal affection and love. This kind of personality eventually produced a big tragedy at his outburst of anger connected to the political situation.
After all, Yeonsangun was expelled by his subjects. But, their moral justification called "Reforming of the Government" by deposing the king was denied by the public at once, because they were regarded as profiteers who expelled their lord for their personal interests and prosperity by taking advantage of the confusion. Thus, Jungjong Restoration called Jungjong-banjeong can be interpreted as a rebel made by meritorious subjects" desire and reforming of the government they argued was just for a justification.
For the subjects who had a strong will desire of co-governance by king and subjects, the king like Yeonsangun was the one to be overthrown or expelled, and the expelled king could not be "king" any more even after his death. Even today, Yeonsangun has been said as a tyrant in Korean history. It deserves of his anger. Confrontation and conflict between the king and his subjects had continued in the desire of own"s royal authority and co-governance by king and subjects throughout the Chosun dynasty. Inner conflict among subjects had also continued with their desire and will, which was called party conflict.
Yeonsangun"s violence and misgovernment is eventually his own responsibility. He should have understood the situations in balance and controlled his emotion. In addition, he should have refrained from impulse and shown his generosity to his subjects to touch them because he was their king. Yeonsangun shows how deficient human"s excessive desire leads to not only personal desolation, but also destroy of a country and society.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• Ⅰ. 들어가는 말
• Ⅱ. 결핍형 인간 연산군
• Ⅲ. 연산군의 분노와 史禍
• Ⅳ. 君臣간 욕망의 충돌과 反正
• Ⅴ. 맺음말
• 참고문헌
• 【Abstract】

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 서병창, "토마스 아퀴나스의 분노 개념" 인간학연구소 (19) : 47-76, 2010

2 이덕일, "조선왕 독살사건(1)" 다산초당 2010

3 신석호, "조선 성종시대의 신구대립" 1 : 1944

4 E, W, Wagner, "정치사적 입장에서 본 이조 사화의 성격" 85 : 1980

5 E, W, Wagner, "이조 사림문제에 대한 재검토" 4 : 1980

6 신명호, "왕을 위한 변명" 김영사 2009

7 신동준, "연산군을 위한 변명" 지식산업사 2006

8 김돈, "연산군대의 군신권력관계, In 조산전기 군신권력관계 연구" 서울대학교출판부 1997

9 한희숙, "연산군대 廢妃尹氏 追封尊崇 과정과 甲子士禍" (사)한국인물사연구회 (10) : 175-213, 2008

10 김범, "연산군" 글항아리 2010

11 이병휴, "사림세력의 진출과 사화" 국사편찬위원회 28 : 1996

12 스테판 에셀, "분노하라" 돌베개 2011

13 이창재, "분노의 유형과 기원에 대한 정신분석적 접근" 인간학연구소 (19) : 107-154, 2010

14 Ron, Pat Potter-Efron, "분노에서 벗어나기" 눈과마음 2004

15 권혁남, "분노에 대한 인간학적 고찰" 인간학연구소 (19) : 77-105, 2010

16 김수영, "분노에 대하여" 20 (20): 2007

17 최현석, "분노, In 인간의 모든 감정" 서해문집 2011

18 김진영, "분노 억압의 역설과 분노 억제의 비밀 ― 외현적 언어 정보의 내현화 과정을 중심으로 ―" 인간학연구소 (19) : 155-196, 2010

19 박종화, "금삼의 피" 을유문화사 1959

20 신해순, "관료간의 대립" 국사편찬위원회 12 : 1984

21 김경호, "결핍과 치유 - 관계성에 대한 성찰 -" 인문과학연구소 (28) : 337-359, 2011

22 송수환, "갑자사화의 새 해석" 57 : 1999

23 "燕山君日記"

24 漱野馬熊, "燕山君のニ大禍獄" 3 : 1931

25 "成宗實錄"

26 신석호, "己卯士禍の由来に關すゐ一考察" 20 : 1935

27 "中宗實錄"