RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      성결운동과 진화론, 그 만남의 역사와 대응

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A106216309

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      This paper deals with the response of the American Holiness movement to Charles Darwin`s theory of evolution. Darwin`s theory of evolution had a huge impact on the American scientific circles and society in the 19th century. In particular, its basic p...

      This paper deals with the response of the American Holiness movement to Charles Darwin`s theory of evolution. Darwin`s theory of evolution had a huge impact on the American scientific circles and society in the 19th century. In particular, its basic premise was a great challenge to Christianity and its main doctrines. In response, American Christianity accepted, or completely rejected the theory of evolution. The American Holiness movement that also started at a similar time, was inevitably encountered Darwin`s theory of evolution and had no choice but to respond to it. According to the author’s research, the response of the Holiness movement to the theory of evolution has several characteristics: First, the Holiness movement was actually indifferent to the theory of evolution, although it externally stood firmly in the creationism camp which was completely opposed to the theory of evolution. Second, the Holiness movement as a member of the bellicose fundamentalism in the 20th century, only focused on conflict rather than dialogue with the theory of evolution. Lastly, the Holiness movement failed to track the theory of evolution (as studies or worldview) and racism (as ideology) which was widely popular among scholars at the time. Based on the above historical facts, the author dares to conclude that the relationship between the two corresponds to ‘the indifference model’. Why, then, did the Holiness movement respond the theory of evolution so indifferently? The author analyzes that the reason is due to the apathetic and dualistic attitude of the Holiness movement to the world (or science in a narrow sense) and, more precisely, the lack of Christian worldview which seeks to see the world from the Christian viewpoint.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • ABSTRACT
      • I. 서론
      • II. 다윈 진화론의 도전
      • III. 성결운동과 진화론의 만남의 역사
      • IV. 결론 및 적용
      • ABSTRACT
      • I. 서론
      • II. 다윈 진화론의 도전
      • III. 성결운동과 진화론의 만남의 역사
      • IV. 결론 및 적용
      • V. 참고문헌
      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼