RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      노트쓰기가 요약문 쓰기에 미치는 영향에 대한 질적 분석 = Qualitative Analysis of the Effect of Note-taking on Summary Writing

      한글로보기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      This study uses a qualitative research method wherein the authors of the abstract are interviewed, and an in-depth analysis is conducted to determine the students' perceptions regarding note-taking, the purpose of note-taking, its application, and the...

      This study uses a qualitative research method wherein the authors of the abstract are interviewed, and an in-depth analysis is conducted to determine the students' perceptions regarding note-taking, the purpose of note-taking, its application, and the relationship between the use of note-taking and the level of summary. Note-taking is an active, cognitive action that helps people to overcome memory-related limitations by recording as much information as possible in limited time and space, such as classrooms. Note-taking ensures the effective use of "attention" and "memory". Moreover, it influences other factors, such as "comprehension," "recognition," and "connection" with other knowledge. The participants indicated that they were fully aware of the utility of note-taking and actively used note-taking, based on their situation and conditions. The results showed that there was a clear difference in the use of "marking" and "memo". "Marking" was often used when the psychological burden of understanding or remembering information or knowledge was weak. On the other hand, "memo was generally used when the cognitive agent consciously determined the importance of the information at hand, thus indicating the need to remember or understand the information. "Memo" and "marking" were not limited to identifying and selecting information that should be learned in the summary process. Note-taking plays a real context role in organizing information. The results show that based on the level of summary, the difference in the recognition mode of note taking was not confirmed. The "high-level" group was specific about the role and function that note-taking played in the summary process. However, the "low-level" group retained the general level of perception. These findings show that there is a clear difference between the ability of the two group to apply and use note-taking for knowledge acquisition and elaboration. In addition, the "high-level" group spent increased time and effort to identify the subject, core content, and structure of the text by using note-taking and constructing the content of the summary. The study findings provide a tentative conclusion that the use of note-taking for training in specific writing genres, such as summary writing, can lead to substantial improvement in students' writing ability.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 주민재, "요약 과정에 나타나는 노트쓰기 양상 분석" 한국작문학회 (42) : 58-94, 2019

      2 Emig, J., "Writing as a model of learning" 28 (28): 122-128, 1977

      3 Boscolo, P., "Writing as a Learning Tool" Kluwer Academic Publishers 2001

      4 Slotte V., "Writing as a Learning Tool" Kluwer Academic Publishers 2001

      5 Behrens, L., "Writing and Reading Across the Curriculum" Scott, Foresman and Company 1987

      6 Slotte V., "Using notes during essay-writing: Is it always helpful?" 18 : 445-459, 1998

      7 Kiewra, K. A., "The relationship between levels of notetaking and achievement" 3 : 273-280, 1984

      8 Rivard, L. P., "Summary writing: A multi-grade study of French immersion and Francophone secondary students" 14 : 171-186, 2001

      9 Castelló, M., "Students’ Note-Taking as a Knowledge-Construction Tool" 20 : 265-285, 2005

      10 Baker, L., "Students' lecture notes and their relation to test performance" 12 : 28-32, 1985

      1 주민재, "요약 과정에 나타나는 노트쓰기 양상 분석" 한국작문학회 (42) : 58-94, 2019

      2 Emig, J., "Writing as a model of learning" 28 (28): 122-128, 1977

      3 Boscolo, P., "Writing as a Learning Tool" Kluwer Academic Publishers 2001

      4 Slotte V., "Writing as a Learning Tool" Kluwer Academic Publishers 2001

      5 Behrens, L., "Writing and Reading Across the Curriculum" Scott, Foresman and Company 1987

      6 Slotte V., "Using notes during essay-writing: Is it always helpful?" 18 : 445-459, 1998

      7 Kiewra, K. A., "The relationship between levels of notetaking and achievement" 3 : 273-280, 1984

      8 Rivard, L. P., "Summary writing: A multi-grade study of French immersion and Francophone secondary students" 14 : 171-186, 2001

      9 Castelló, M., "Students’ Note-Taking as a Knowledge-Construction Tool" 20 : 265-285, 2005

      10 Baker, L., "Students' lecture notes and their relation to test performance" 12 : 28-32, 1985

      11 Van Dijk, T. A., "Strategies of discourse comprehension" Academic Press 1983

      12 Peper, R. J., "Note-taking as a generative activity" 70 : 514-522, 1978

      13 Einstein, G. O., "Note-Taking, Individual Differences, and Memory for Lecture Information" 77 (77): 522-532, 1985

      14 Kiewra, K. A., "Note taking functions and techniques" 83 (83): 240-245, 1991

      15 Di Vesta, F. J., "Listening and notetaking" 63 (63): 8-14, 1972

      16 Wittrock, M. C., "Learning as a generative process" 19 (19): 87-95, 1974

      17 Piolat, A., "Cognitive effort of note taking" 19 : 291-312, 2005

      18 Ariel, R., "Agenda-based regulation of study-time allocation: When agendas override item-based monitoring" 138 (138): 432-447, 2009

      19 Carvalho, J., "Acquiring, Elaborating and Expressing Knowledge – a Study with Portuguese University Students"

      20 Benzer, A., "A Student-Focused Study: Strategy of Text Summary Writing and Assessment Rubric" 41 : 163-183, 2016

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2027 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2021-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2018-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2015-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2006-02-24 학술지명변경 외국어명 : 미등록 -> Korean Language Education KCI등재
      2005-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2002-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      1999-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 1.01 1.01 0.94
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.92 0.96 1.335 0.5
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼