RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재 SCI SCIE SCOPUS

      Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography Does Not Accurately Predict the Need of Coronary Revascularization in Patients with Stable Angina

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A103610964

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Purpose: To evaluate the ability of coronary computed tomographic angiography (CCTA) to predict the need of coronary revascularizationin symptomatic patients with stable angina who were referred to a cardiac catheterization laboratory for coronary rev...

      Purpose: To evaluate the ability of coronary computed tomographic angiography (CCTA) to predict the need of coronary revascularizationin symptomatic patients with stable angina who were referred to a cardiac catheterization laboratory for coronary revascularization.
      Materials and Methods: Pre-angiography CCTA findings were analyzed in 1846 consecutive symptomatic patients with stable angina, who were referred to a cardiac catheterization laboratory at six hospitals and were potential candidates for coronary revascularizationbetween July 2011 and December 2013. The number of patients requiring revascularization was determined based on the severity of coronary stenosis as assessed by CCTA. This was compared to the actual number of revascularization procedures performed in the cardiac catheterization laboratory.
      Results: Based on CCTA findings, coronary revascularization was indicated in 877 (48%) and not indicated in 969 (52%) patients. Of the 877 patients indicated for revascularization by CCTA, only 600 (68%) underwent the procedure, whereas 285 (29%) of the 969 patients not indicated for revascularization, as assessed by CCTA, underwent the procedure. When the coronary arteries were divided into 15 segments using the American Heart Association coronary tree model, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of CCTA for therapeutic decision making on a per-segment analysis were 42%, 96%, 40%, and 96%, respectively.
      Conclusion: CCTA-based assessment of coronary stenosis severity does not sufficiently differentiate between coronary segments requiring revascularization versus those not requiring revascularization. Conventional coronary angiography should be consideredto determine the need of revascularization in symptomatic patients with stable angina.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 Arbab-Zadeh A, "Quantification of coronary arterial stenoses by multidetector CT angiography in comparison with conventional angiography methods, caveats, and implications" 4 : 191-202, 2011

      2 Yan RT, "Predictors of inaccurate coronary arterial stenosis assessment by CT angiography" 6 : 963-972, 2013

      3 Groothuis JG, "Positive predictive value of computed tomography coronary angiography in clinical practice" 156 : 315-319, 2012

      4 Douglas PS, "Outcomes of anatomical versus functional testing for coronary artery disease" 372 : 1291-1300, 2015

      5 Schuetz GM, "Meta-analysis: noninvasive coronary angiography using computed tomography versus magnetic resonance imaging" 152 : 167-177, 2010

      6 Kim C, "Limitations of coronary computed tomographic angiography for delineating the lumen and vessel contours of coronary arteries in patients with stable angina." 16 : 1358-1365, 2015

      7 Cademartiri F, "Influence of intra-coronary enhancement on diagnostic accuracy with 64-slice CT coronary angiography" 18 : 576-583, 2008

      8 Kruk M, "Impact of coronary artery calcium characteristics on accuracy of CT angiography" 7 : 49-58, 2014

      9 Achenbach S, "Imaging of coronary atherosclerosis by computed tomography" 31 : 1442-1448, 2010

      10 Muhlestein JB, "Effect of screening for coronary artery disease using CT angiography on mortality and cardiac events in high-risk patients with diabetes: the FACTOR-64 randomized clinical trial" 312 : 2234-2243, 2014

      1 Arbab-Zadeh A, "Quantification of coronary arterial stenoses by multidetector CT angiography in comparison with conventional angiography methods, caveats, and implications" 4 : 191-202, 2011

      2 Yan RT, "Predictors of inaccurate coronary arterial stenosis assessment by CT angiography" 6 : 963-972, 2013

      3 Groothuis JG, "Positive predictive value of computed tomography coronary angiography in clinical practice" 156 : 315-319, 2012

      4 Douglas PS, "Outcomes of anatomical versus functional testing for coronary artery disease" 372 : 1291-1300, 2015

      5 Schuetz GM, "Meta-analysis: noninvasive coronary angiography using computed tomography versus magnetic resonance imaging" 152 : 167-177, 2010

      6 Kim C, "Limitations of coronary computed tomographic angiography for delineating the lumen and vessel contours of coronary arteries in patients with stable angina." 16 : 1358-1365, 2015

      7 Cademartiri F, "Influence of intra-coronary enhancement on diagnostic accuracy with 64-slice CT coronary angiography" 18 : 576-583, 2008

      8 Kruk M, "Impact of coronary artery calcium characteristics on accuracy of CT angiography" 7 : 49-58, 2014

      9 Achenbach S, "Imaging of coronary atherosclerosis by computed tomography" 31 : 1442-1448, 2010

      10 Muhlestein JB, "Effect of screening for coronary artery disease using CT angiography on mortality and cardiac events in high-risk patients with diabetes: the FACTOR-64 randomized clinical trial" 312 : 2234-2243, 2014

      11 Miller JM, "Diagnostic performance of coronary angiography by 64-row CT" 359 : 2324-2336, 2008

      12 Budoff MJ, "Diagnostic performance of 64-multidetector row coronary computed tomographic angiography for evaluation of coronary artery stenosis in individuals without known coronary artery disease: results from the prospective multicenter ACCURACY (Assessment by Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography of Individuals Undergoing Invasive Coronary Angiography) trial" 52 : 1724-1732, 2008

      13 Arbab-Zadeh A, "Diagnostic accuracy of computed tomography coronary angiography according to pre-test probability of coronary artery disease and severity of coronary arterial calcification. The CORE-64 (Coronary Artery Evaluation Using 64-Row Multidetector Computed Tomography Angiography) International Multicenter Study" 59 : 379-387, 2012

      14 Meijboom WB, "Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography: a prospective, multicenter, multivendor study" 52 : 2135-2144, 2008

      15 Shaw LJ, "Coronary computed tomographic angiography as a gatekeeper to invasive diagnostic and surgical procedures:results from the multicenter CONFIRM (Coronary CT Angiography Evaluation for Clinical Outcomes: an International Multicenter) registry" 60 : 2103-2114, 2012

      16 Moscariello A, "Coronary CT angiography versus conventional cardiac angiography for therapeutic decision making in patients with high likelihood of coronary artery disease" 265 : 385-392, 2012

      17 Piers LH, "Computed tomographic angiography or conventional coronary angiography in therapeutic decision-making" 29 : 2902-2907, 2008

      18 de Feyter PJ, "CCTA to guide revascularization for highrisk CAD: a ‘cliff hanger’" 33 : 3011-3013, 2012

      19 Min JK, "All-cause mortality benefit of coronary revascularization vs. medical therapy in patients without known coronary artery disease undergoing coronary computed tomographic angiography: results from CONFIRM (COronary CT Angiography EvaluatioN For Clinical Outcomes: an InteRnational Multicenter Registry)" 33 : 3088-3097, 2012

      20 Taylor AJ, "ACCF/SCCT/ACR/AHA/ASE/ASNC/NASCI/SCAI/SCMR 2010 Appropriate Use Criteria for Cardiac Computed Tomography. A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force, the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, the American College of Radiology, the American Heart Association, the American Society of Echocardiography, the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, the North American Society for Cardiovascular Imaging, the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance" 122 : e525-e555, 2010

      21 Austen WG, "A reporting system on patients evaluated for coronary artery disease. Report of the Ad Hoc Committee for Grading of Coronary Artery Disease, Council on Cardiovascular Surgery, American Heart Association" 51 (51): 5-40, 1975

      22 Mowatt G, "64-Slice computed tomography angiography in the diagnosis and assessment of coronary artery disease: systematic review and meta-analysis" 94 : 1386-1393, 2008

      23 Levine GN, "2011 ACCF/AHA/SCAI Guideline for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions" 124 : e574-e651, 2011

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2023 평가예정 해외DB학술지평가 신청대상 (해외등재 학술지 평가)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (해외등재 학술지 평가) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2005-05-31 학술지등록 한글명 : Yonsei Medical Journal
      외국어명 : Yonsei Medical Journal
      KCI등재
      2005-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2002-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2000-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 1.42 0.3 0.99
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.83 0.72 0.546 0.08
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼