On the interplay between syntax and statistical learning on errors in argument structure

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

It has often been reported (cf. Bowerman, 1974) that L1 children or L2 learners tend to make errors in the use of verbs or predicates. They over-passivize, over-causativize, or over-intransitivize verbs or predicates when they have insufficient or incorrect knowledge of the language they try to acquire or learn. We examine these three types of errors, investigating what part of syntax is responsible for these errors, and how language development or learning proceeds on the basis of the language input available to L1 children or L2 learners to overcome these errors. We propose that all three cases of over-generalization are ascribed to the functional category, i.e. the little v, which is responsible for argument structure alternations. L1 children or L2 learners are presumably lacking or deficient in this functional category. However, they capitalize on statistical learning to learn the exact category of a verb or predicate on the basis of its distributional properties, identifying what verb or predicate can combine with a right kind of little v.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 Lord, C., "“Don’t you fall me down”: Children’s generalizations regarding cause and transitivity" Department of Linguistics, Stanford University 81-89, 1979

2 Pesetsky, David., "Zero syntax vol. 2: Infinitives"

3 Marantz, A., "Words" University of Southern California 23-25, 2001

4 Bowerman, M., "When a patient is the subject: sorting out passives, anticausatives, and middles in the acquisition of English"

5 Vlachos, A., "Unsupervised and constrained Dirichlet process mixture models for verb clustering" 2009

6 Hornstein, N., "Understanding minimalism" Cambridge University Press 2005

7 Deprez, V., "Underspecification, functional projections and parameter setting, In Heads, projections and learnability" Lawrence Erlbaum 249-271, 1994

8 Hoekstra, T., "The underspecification of number and the licensing of root infinitives" 293-306, 1996

9 Clark, E. V., "The lexicon in acquisition" Cambridge University Press 1993

10 Yang, C., "The infinite gift: How children learn and unlearn the languages of the world" Scribner 2006

11 Ambridge, B., "The effect of verb semantic class and verb frequency (entrenchment) on children's and adults' graded judgements of argument-structure overgeneralization errors" 106 (106): 87-129, 2008

12 Radford, A., "The acquisition of the morphosyntax of finite verbs in English, In The acquisition of verb placement: Functional categories and V2 phenomena in language acquisition" Kluwer Academic Publishers 23-62, 1992

13 Bowerman, M., "The acquisition of the English causative alternation, In Crosslinguistic perspectives on argument structure: Implications for learnability" Lawrence Erlbuam 279-307, 2007

14 Chomsky, N., "The Minimalist program" MIT Press 1995

15 Radford, A., "Syntactic theory and the acquisition of English syntax: The nature of early child grammars of English" Basil Blackwell 1990

16 Wallach, H. M., "Structured topic models for language" Univ. of Cambridge 2008

17 Radford, A., "Small children's small clauses" 86 : 1-43, 1988

18 Arad, M., "Roots and patterns: Hebrew Morpho-syntax. Studies in natural language and linguistic theory" Springer 2005

19 Larson, R, "On the double object construction" 19 : 335-392, 1988

20 Hale, K., "On the argument structure and the lexical expression of syntactic relations, In The view from building 20: Essays in linguistics in honor of Sylvain Bromberger" MIT Press 53-109, 1993

21 Marantz, A., "No escape from syntax: don’t try morphological analysis in the privacy of your own lexicon" Department of Linguistics, U. of Pennsylvania 201-225, 1997

22 Pearl, L., "Necessary bias in natural language learning" University of Maryland 2007

23 Arad, M., "Locality constraints on the interpretation of roots : The case of Hebrew denominal verbs" 21 (21): 737-778, 2003

24 Parisien, C., "Learning verb alternations in a usage-based Bayesian model" Cognitive Science Society 2010

25 Bowerman, M., "Learning the structure of causative verbs: A study in the relationship of cognitive, semantic, and syntactic development" Department of Linguistics, Stanford University 142-178, 1974

26 Pinker, S., "Learnability and cognition: The acquisition of argument structure" The MIT Press 1989

27 Blei, D. M., "Latent Dirichlet allocation" 3 : 993-1022,

28 Pinker, S., "Language learnability and language development" Harvard University Press 1984

29 Yip, V., "Interlanguage and learnability: From Chinese to English" Benjamins 1995

30 Teh, Y. W., "Hierarchical dirichlet processes" 101 (101): 1566-1581, 2006

31 Miller, G., "Finitary models of language users, In Handbook of mathematical psychology, Vol. II" Wiley 1963

32 Bowerman, M., "Evaluating competing linguistic models with language acquisition data: implications of developmental errors with causative verbs" 3 : 5-66, 1982

33 Goldberg, A. E., "Constructions at work: the nature of generalization in language" Oxford University Press 2006

34 Grimshaw, J., "Complement selection and the lexicon" 10 (10): 279-326, 1979

35 Marcotte, J.-P., "Causative alternation errors as event-driven construction paradigm completions, In Constructions in acquisition" CSLI 205-232, 2006

36 Lidz, J., "Causation and reflexivity in Kannada, In Clause Structure in South Asian Languages" Kluwer 93-130, 2003

37 Zobl, H., "Canonical structures and ergativity, In Linguistic perspectives on second language acquisition" Cambridge University Press 203-221, 1989