RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재 SCI SCIE SCOPUS

      Diagnostic Test Accuracy Review of Cytology for Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion and Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Uterine Cervix

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A106011862

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Background: Even though cervico-vaginal smears have been used as a primary screening test for cervical carcinoma, the diagnostic accuracy has been controversial. The present study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of cytology for squamous intr...

      Background: Even though cervico-vaginal smears have been used as a primary screening test for cervical carcinoma, the diagnostic accuracy has been controversial. The present study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of cytology for squamous intraepithelial lesion (SIL) and squamous cell carcinoma (SqCC) of the uterine cervix through a diagnostic test accuracy (DTA) review.
      Methods: A DTA review was performed using 38 eligible studies that showed concordance between cytology and histology. In the DTA review, sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratio (OR), and the area under the curve (AUC) on the summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve were calculated.
      Results: In the comparison between abnormal cytology and histology, the pooled sensitivity and specificity were 93.9% (95% confidence interval [CI], 93.7%–94.1%) and 77.6% (95% CI, 77.4–77.8%), respectively. The diagnostic OR and AUC on the SROC curve were 8.90 (95% CI, 5.57–14.23) and 0.8148, respectively. High-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) cytology had a higher sensitivity (97.6%; 95% CI, 94.7%–97.8%) for predicting HSIL or worse histology. In the comparison between SqCC identified on cytology and on histological analysis, the pooled sensitivity and specificity, diagnostic OR, and AUC were 92.7% (95% CI, 87.3%–96.3%), 87.5% (95% CI, 87.2%–87.8%), 865.81 (95% CI, 68.61–10,925.12), and 0.9855, respectively. Geographic locations with well-organized screening programs had higher sensitivity than areas with insufficient screening programs.
      Conclusion: These results indicate that cytology had a higher sensitivity and specificity for detecting SIL and SqCC of the uterine cervix during primary screening.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 Hutchinson ML, "Utility of liquid-based cytology for cervical carcinoma screening : results of a population-based study conducted in a region of Costa Rica with a high incidence of cervical carcinoma" 87 (87): 48-55, 1999

      2 Negri G, "ThinPrep versus conventional Papanicolaou smear in the cytologic follow-up of women with equivocal cervical smears" 99 (99): 342-345, 2003

      3 Bigras G, "The probability for a Pap test to be abnormal is directly proportional to HPV viral load : results from a Swiss study comparing HPV testing and liquid-based cytology to detect cervical cancer precursors in 13, 842 women" 93 (93): 575-581, 2005

      4 Guo M, "The predictive value of p16(INK4a)and hybrid capture 2 human papillomavirus testing for high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia" 122 (122): 894-901, 2004

      5 Cárdenas-Turanzas M, "The performance of human papillomavirus high-risk DNA testing in the screening and diagnostic settings" 17 (17): 2865-2871, 2008

      6 Castanon A, "Systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data to assess the sensitivity of cervical cytology for diagnosis of cervical cancer in low-and middle-income countries" 3 (3): 524-538, 2017

      7 Beerman H, "Superior performance of liquid-based versus conventional cytology in a population-based cervical cancer screening program" 112 (112): 572-576, 2009

      8 Belinson JL, "Shanxi Province cervical cancer screening study II : self-sampling for high-risk human papillomavirus compared to direct sampling for human papillomavirus and liquid based cervical cytology" 13 (13): 819-826, 2003

      9 Ferreccio C, "Screening trial of human papillomavirus for early detection of cervical cancer in Santiago, Chile" 132 (132): 916-923, 2013

      10 Schneider A, "Screening for high-grade cervical intra-epithelial neoplasia and cancer by testing for high-risk HPV, routine cytology or colposcopy" 89 (89): 529-534, 2000

      1 Hutchinson ML, "Utility of liquid-based cytology for cervical carcinoma screening : results of a population-based study conducted in a region of Costa Rica with a high incidence of cervical carcinoma" 87 (87): 48-55, 1999

      2 Negri G, "ThinPrep versus conventional Papanicolaou smear in the cytologic follow-up of women with equivocal cervical smears" 99 (99): 342-345, 2003

      3 Bigras G, "The probability for a Pap test to be abnormal is directly proportional to HPV viral load : results from a Swiss study comparing HPV testing and liquid-based cytology to detect cervical cancer precursors in 13, 842 women" 93 (93): 575-581, 2005

      4 Guo M, "The predictive value of p16(INK4a)and hybrid capture 2 human papillomavirus testing for high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia" 122 (122): 894-901, 2004

      5 Cárdenas-Turanzas M, "The performance of human papillomavirus high-risk DNA testing in the screening and diagnostic settings" 17 (17): 2865-2871, 2008

      6 Castanon A, "Systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data to assess the sensitivity of cervical cytology for diagnosis of cervical cancer in low-and middle-income countries" 3 (3): 524-538, 2017

      7 Beerman H, "Superior performance of liquid-based versus conventional cytology in a population-based cervical cancer screening program" 112 (112): 572-576, 2009

      8 Belinson JL, "Shanxi Province cervical cancer screening study II : self-sampling for high-risk human papillomavirus compared to direct sampling for human papillomavirus and liquid based cervical cytology" 13 (13): 819-826, 2003

      9 Ferreccio C, "Screening trial of human papillomavirus for early detection of cervical cancer in Santiago, Chile" 132 (132): 916-923, 2013

      10 Schneider A, "Screening for high-grade cervical intra-epithelial neoplasia and cancer by testing for high-risk HPV, routine cytology or colposcopy" 89 (89): 529-534, 2000

      11 Agorastos T, "Primary screening for cervical cancer based on high-risk human papillomavirus(HPV)detection and HPV 16 and HPV 18 genotyping, in comparison to cytology" 10 (10): e0119755-, 2015

      12 Castle PE, "Performance of carcinogenic human papillomavirus(HPV)testing and HPV16 or HPV18 genotyping for cervical cancer screening of women aged 25 years and older : a subanalysis of the ATHENA study" 12 (12): 880-890, 2011

      13 Kim SH, "Overall accuracy of cervical cytology and clinicopathological significance of LSIL cells in ASC-H cytology" 28 (28): 16-23, 2017

      14 Cuzick J, "Management of women who test positive for high-risk types of human papillomavirus : the HART study" 362 (362): 1871-1876, 2003

      15 Sigurdsson K, "Is a liquid-based cytology more sensitive than a conventional Pap smear?" 24 (24): 254-263, 2013

      16 Petry KU, "Inclusion of HPV testing in routine cervical cancer screening for women above 29 years in Germany : results for 8466 patients" 88 (88): 1570-1577, 2003

      17 Cuzick J, "Human papillomavirus testing in primary cervical screening" 345 (345): 1533-1536, 1995

      18 Agorastos T, "Human papillomavirus testing for primary screening in women at low risk of developing cervical cancer. The Greek experience" 96 (96): 714-720, 2005

      19 Wu R, "Human papillomavirus messenger RNA assay for cervical cancer screening : the Shenzhen Cervical Cancer Screening Trial I" 20 (20): 1411-1414, 2010

      20 Iftner T, "Head-to-head comparison of the RNA-based aptima human papillomavirus(HPV)assay and the DNA-based hybrid capture 2 HPV test in a routine screening population of women Aged 30 to 60 years in Germany" 53 (53): 2509-2516, 2015

      21 Paraskevaidis E, "Expanded cytological referral criteria for colposcopy in cervical screening: comparison with human papillomavirus testing" 82 (82): 355-359, 2001

      22 Monsonego J, "Evaluation of oncogenic human papillomavirus RNA and DNA tests with liquid-based cytology in primary cervical cancer screening : the FASE study" 129 (129): 691-701, 2011

      23 McAdam M, "Evaluation of a cervical cancer screening program based on HPV testing and LLETZ excision in a low resource setting" 5 (5): e13266-, 2010

      24 Chung JH, "Efficacy assessment of CellSlide in liquid-based gynecologic cytology" 99 (99): 597-602, 2005

      25 Li N, "Different cervical cancer screening approaches in a Chinese multicentre study" 100 (100): 532-537, 2009

      26 Koliopoulos G, "Cytology versus HPV testing for cervical cancer screening in the general population" 8 : CD008587-, 2017

      27 Chute DJ, "Cytologic-histologic correlation of screening and diagnostic Papanicolaou tests" 34 (34): 503-506, 2006

      28 Alanbay İ, "Cytohistological discrepancies of cervico-vaginal smears and HPV status" 88 (88): 235-238, 2017

      29 Mahmud SM, "Comparison of human papillomavirus testing and cytology for cervical cancer screening in a primary health care setting in the Democratic Republic of the Congo" 124 (124): 286-291, 2012

      30 ahimi S, "Comparison of conventional Papanicolaou smears and fluid-based, thin-layer cytology with colposcopic biopsy control in central Italy: a consecutive sampling study of 461 cases" 37 (37): 1-3, 2009

      31 Salmerón J, "Comparison of HPV-based assays with Papanicolaou smears for cervical cancer screening in Morelos State, Mexico" 14 (14): 505-512, 2003

      32 Canda MT, "Clinical results of the liquid-based cervical cytology tool, Liqui-PREP, in comparison with conventional smears for detection of squamous cell abnormalities" 10 (10): 399-402, 2009

      33 Depuydt CE, "BD-ProExC as adjunct molecular marker for improved detection of CIN2+ after HPV primary screening" 20 (20): 628-637, 2011

      34 Benedet JL, "An analysis of 84244 patients from the British Columbia cytology-colposcopy program" 92 (92): 127-134, 2004

      35 Blumenthal PD, "Adjunctive testing for cervical cancer in low resource settings with visual inspection, HPV, and the Pap smear" 72 (72): 47-53, 2001

      36 Sankaranarayanan R, "Accuracy of human papillomavirus testing in primary screening of cervical neoplasia : results from a multicenter study in India" 112 (112): 341-347, 2004

      37 Pan Q, "A thin-layer, liquid-based pap test for mass screening in an area of China with a high incidence of cervical carcinoma. A cross-sectional, comparative study" 47 (47): 45-50, 2003

      38 Sykes PH, "A randomised comparison of SurePath liquid-based cytology and conventional smear cytology in a colposcopy clinic setting" 115 (115): 1375-1381, 2008

      39 Hovland S, "A comprehensive evaluation of the accuracy of cervical pre-cancer detection methods in a high-risk area in East Congo" 102 (102): 957-965, 2010

      40 Zhu J, "A comparison of liquid-based cytology and Pap smear as a screening method for cervical cancer" 18 (18): 157-160, 2007

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2023 평가예정 해외DB학술지평가 신청대상 (해외등재 학술지 평가)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (해외등재 학술지 평가) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2005-01-01 평가 SCI 등재 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2002-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      1999-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 1.48 0.37 1.06
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.85 0.75 0.691 0.11
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼