미국ㆍ한국의 공직 감찰 법제 비교분석 = A Comparative Study of legal corruption monitor legislation of the United States and Korea

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

A Study on the corresponding office monitor legislation of the central and local governments of the United States. Corruption of government of recent intensified, now there is a need for anti-corruption policy. Corruption of the government, to interfere with the realization of the rule of law. And, people bring a distrust of government. The corruption of government, adverse effects of destruction of law and order and the weakening of the administrative function is serious.
In particular, of government corruption, criminal acts using his position is serious. Crime of civil servants because they have the status of a political nature, the crime rate is high. And, the level of criticism consciousness of the general public for the crime of public officials is high, a scheme that is able to sanction this is necessary. As limited to the ethical issues of individual public officials, civil servants of crime in the past, was the disciplinary and punishment for the civil service. Because, it is not a problem of illegal personal anymore, and approach the problem environment and organization, about the plan as surrounding the individual, crimes committed by public officials, must seek the unauthorized inspection scheme.
In order to seek a solution of the unauthorized inspection of public institutions, it is necessary to analyze the legislation and institutions overseas. The United States is installed and operated as Office of Government Ethics and Office of Inspector General based on nspector General Act of 1978 and Ethics in Government Act of 1978 in particular. Watergate scandal and later, corruption legislation in the United States began to regulate the fraud on the private interests of public officials. The United States has to enforce the civil service appointment system. However, in the wake of the assassination of the President due to people disaffected personnel problem in the 1880s of James Abram Garfield, which has been converted to the enactment of the Pendleton Civil Service Act.
After that, the legal system for the liquidation of the corruption of public officials is developing steadily, in the wake of the Watergate scandal, Ethics in Government Act of 1978 was enacted in the 1970s. This has made the establishment of a monitoring system for the practice and the civil service code of ethics. However, laws and regulations are well-equipped, but, in order to generate corruption will continue, to eliminate this, the Bush administration has set up a public office ethics station in the late 1980s. Were also analyzed by analyzing the New Jersey Oregon and local government, and whether they are against corruption, such as how as an institution. Based on this, by analyzing the legal system of the central and local governments of the United States, we analyzed the anti-corruption system of public sector of Korea.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• Ⅰ. 서론
• Ⅱ. 미국 중앙ㆍ지방 정부의 공직감찰 법과 제도의 분석
• Ⅲ. 한국 공직감찰 법제 및 대응
• Ⅳ. 시사점 및 결론
• 참고문헌
• Abstract

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 박희정, "환경변화에 따른 직무감찰체계 개선방안" 감사원 2012

2 장지원, "한국 공공부문의 부패실채 추이분석" 한국행정연구원 2008

3 최재천, "최재천의 자연과 문화 제266, 百罰百戒, 조선일보, 2014. 5. 20,, 30면"

4 국민권익위원회, "지방부패근절토론회 자료집" 2014

5 "주(州)윤리위원회 홈페이지"

6 국무조정실 국무총리비서실, "정부, 대통령 대국민 담화 직후 후속조치 착수 : 5.19 국무조정실장 주재" 2014

7 오영근, "우리나라 형사법제 하에서 검·경 합동수사기구 상설화 가능성에 대한 연구" 대검찰청 2012

8 "오리건 주 윤리위원회 전문가 자문"

9 "오리건 주 윤리위원회 벌금 관련 내용"

10 "오리건 주 윤리위원회 기관소개"

11 "오리건 주 윤리위원회 구성"

12 "오리건 주 윤리위원회 교육내용"

13 "오리건 주 법령 및 규칙"

14 김태룡, "역대정부의 부패방지정책의 평가와 과제 : 거버넌스적 관점에서" 2003

15 차문중, "사회적 청렴과 국가경쟁력 간 연관성 분석·연구" 한국개발연구원 2009

16 국민권익위원회, "부패영향평가사례집" 2007

17 박준, "법관⋅검사 징계사례에 관한 연구" 법학연구소 55 (55): 613-694, 2014

18 박수헌, "미연방 내부고발자보호법에 관한 고찰" 한국토지공법학회 37 (37): 225-246, 2007

19 배충환, "미국의 반부패 제도 및 법규 연구" 법무부 2006

20 정영일, "미국의 공직부패에 대한 대응 법제도" 국제지역연구센터 14 (14): 311-332, 2010

21 이시우, "미국 감찰국(OIG, Office of Inspector General)의 감찰활동 기준 소개" 감사원 (신년) : 2011

22 "뉴저지 주 이해충돌법"

23 "뉴저지 주 윤리위원회"

24 조정찬, "국민권익 법체계 개선 및 현행법 전면개정 방안 연구" 법령정보관리원 2012

25 "공직자윤리국"

26 지영환, "공무원범죄학" 형설출판사 2010

27 지영환, "공무원범죄 통제를 위한 형사입법론적 연구 : 고위공무원 부패범죄를 중심으로" 경희대학교 대학원 2007

28 지영환, "監査院 特別調査局의 役割 提高를 위한暗行御史制度 運營 및 含意" 법과정책연구원 20 (20): 485-520, 2014

29 Washington Post, "The 10 most corrupt states in the U.S. Posted: 06/18/2014"

30 Ronald N. Johnson, "Replacing Political Patronage with Merit: The Roles of the President and the Congress in the Origins of the Federal Civil Service System" University of Chicago Press 1994

31 Council of the Inspectors General on Integrity and Efficiency, "Quality Standards for Inspection and Evaluation"

32 U.S. Office of Government Ethics, "Public Financial Disclosure: A Reviewer's Reference" 2004

33 Oregon Government Ethics Commission, "OREGON GOVERNMENT ETHICS LAW, A GUIDE FOR PUBLIC OFFICIALS"

34 Oregon Government Ethics Commission, "OREGON GOVERNMENT ETHICS LAW, A GUIDE FOR PUBLIC OFFICIALS" 2010

35 "OREGON GOVERNMENT ETHICS LAW A GUIDE FOR PUBLIC OFFICIALS"

36 United States Senate, "Investigation into Allegations of Misconduct by the Former Acting and Deputy Inspector General of the Department of Homeland Security"

37 Directorate of Ethics and Integrity Office of the President, "GOVERNMENT STRATEGY AND PLAN OF ACTION TO FIGHT CORRUPTION AND BUILD ETHICS AND INTEGRITY IN PUBLIC OFFICE" 2000

38 Homeland Security, "Federal Emergency Management Agency Faces Challenges in Modernizing Information Technology" 2011

39 OREGON ASSOCIATION OF MUNICIPAL RECORDERS, "CITY RECORDER’S PROCEDURE MANUAL" 2011

40 Huffington Post, "Broke States Just Might Have Political Corruption To Blame, Posted: 07/15/2014"

41 국민권익위원회, "2011 국민권익백서" 2011

42 장영민, "'공직자 買收(매수)' 원천 차단하는 김영란 法', 조선일보, 2014. 7. 8. 34면"