중앙행정권한의 지방이양 촉진을 위한 정책추진시스템에 관한 연구 = (The) study on the policy propulsion system for promoting the local transfer of the administrative authority of the central government

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

As the administrative function has been enlarged in quantity and upgraded in quality today, in order to execute that function that takes partial charge of the task, the need for the vertical division of labor between the central government and the local government has been increasing while the administrative function needs to be united and adjusted in the nation-wide and synthetic viewpoint. In this point, there is the need of the harmony of the centralization of power and the decentralization of power and ideal assignment between the central government and the local government is very important.
The administrative function of the nation is executed by the division of the task and cooperation of the central government and the local government. As the problems of the task division in the central and local government place limit upon not only the scope of the autonomous rights which contains the legal meaning but also the contents of the autonomous rights, the setting up the relation among the central and local, and a wide and basic self-government bodies is very important. The problems of the task division in the central and local government are decided by the practical aspects between the central and local governments and the task division is the necessary task for the efficient operation in the local self-government period in the base of reasonal principles and standards. Therefore the general principles and standards among the central and local government and the local self-government bodies are synthesized in the main subject and by examining the problems and realities of the task division in the central and local government, the need of the task division is presented. And the reason that administrative function and tasks don't be transferred to the local government is suggested and especially what the principles and standards in Korean reality are and policy substitute measures for the reasonal task division and policy propulsion system for the local transfer is present.
As the problems of the central administrative authority to the local transfer is connected with the original problems, the problems of the task division is very important. In the concrete problems of the function distribution among agencies, first, the principles of convenience, second, of efficiency, third, of equality should be the basic principles, and when the constitution entrusts the local self-administration to the laws, the limitation of laws that entrust in order not to infringe the essence of the local self-administration is required, and the 'statute' provision in the eighth chapter of the constitution should be reformed the laws. Finally, owing to the authoritarianism culture of the centralized authoritarian rule, the recognition on the local self-administration in the legal circles is very lack.
In order to understand and fix the local division rightly, public officials should establish the ground which promotes the true 'division from the below' through the acquisition of the information and the study, and suitable human power and financial measures should be inevitably accompanied by the practical authority transfer for the fixing of the local self-administration. Up to now, there is no great development because of the absence of the concrete methodology although the need is recognized. Accordingly, the concrete, plural methodology should be suggested and the financial resources and the method of human power computation that everyone could be accepted should be produced through the continual criticism and discussion in the academic world and government agencies. Ultimately, through the improvement the system, there is a kind of expectation to the high society that the prediction is possible. Without the transparent systematic procedure and concretely consulted methodology and with the arbitrary distribution of resources in the vested right levels or practical authority groups, there is a sort of possibility which agencies can not perform their goals to the open society. In short, our local self-administration needs the improvement and policy support that accord to the global standard, keeping pace with the division of work, the self-regulation, the democratization. Especially the social sharing of the sympathy that converted measures to the local self-administration in the finances and human power should be executed is required, and the cost computation principles and methodology should be established in order to support this system in the government and we will have the greatest task that fixs and organizes the local self-administration.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• 목차 = ⅰ
• 제1장 서론 = 1
• 제1철 연구의 배경 및 목적 = 1
• 1. 연구의 배경 = 1
• 2. 연구의 목적 = 4
• 제2절 연구의 범위 및 방법 = 7
• 1. 연구의 범위 = 7
• 2. 연구의 방법 = 9
• 제2장 중앙행정권한의 지방이양에 관한 이론적 고찰 = 13
• 제1절 국가와 지방자치단채간의 관계이론에 대한 논의 = 13
• 1. 정부간 관계론 = 13
• 2. 자치분권과 행정분권이론 = 17
• 3. 국가와 자치단체간 지도감독 관계 = 28
• 제2절 중앙행정권한과 지방이양의 의의 = 36
• 1. 중앙행정권한이양의 개념 = 36
• 2. 중앙행정기관의 권한이양 유형과 효과 = 43
• 3. 중앙행정기관의 분권화 현실과 지방이양의 필요성 = 49
• 제3절 국가(중앙정부)와 지방자치단체간 사무배분 이론 = 53
• 1. 중앙과 지방사무의 분류체계 = 56
• 2. 자치분권의 헌법적 가치와 사무배분 = 60
• 3. 지방이양, 사무배분, 기능배분의 원칙과 기준 = 71
• 제4절 외국의 사례분석 = 85
• 1. 일본 = 87
• 2. 프랑스 = 99
• 3. 영국 = 110
• 4. 독일 = 116
• 5. 일본, 프랑스, 영국, 독일의 사무배분 비교분석 = 120
• 제5절 분석의 틀 = 126
• 1. 정책추진시스템과 권한이양과의 관계 = 126
• 2. 정책추진시스템의 구조 = 127
• 제3장 중앙행정권한의 지방이양 추진체계 관한 실태분석 = 130
• 제1절 우리나라 지방이양 추진체계의 실태분석 = 130
• 1. 현재 사무배분의 일반적 특징 = 130
• 2. 중앙-지방간 기능배분 실태조사의 선행연구 분석 = 134
• 3. 중앙권한의 지방이양 추진시스템 실태분석 = 141
• 제2절 지방이양 추진체계의 문제점과 방향정립을 위한 고려사항 = 163
• 1. 우리나라 지방이양 추진체계의 문제점 = 163
• 2. 향후 지방이양추진체계 방향정립을 위한 고려사항 = 178
• 제4장 중앙행정권한의 지방이양을 위한 정책추진시스템의 개선방향 = 183
• 제1절 정책시스템 개편의 기본방향 = 183
• 제2절 사무배분에서의 접근대안 = 184
• 1. 사무배분 원칙과 기준 재정립을 위한 기본방향 = 184
• 2. 사무배분원칙의 재정립 = 187
• 3. 사무배분의 기준제시 = 195
• 제3절 운영측면에서의 접근대안 : 지방이양 수준측정시스템 구축 = 198
• 1. 대상사무의 발굴 · 선정 단계 = 198
• 2. 이양심의 단계 = 199
• 3. 확정사무의 사후관리 단계 = 202
• 4. 지방이양 수준측정 시스템의 구축 = 205
• 제4절 제도적 접근대안 : 「지방이양 촉진법」을 중심으로 = 208
• 1. 사전적 이양기능의 보강 : 사전 심사기능의 부여 = 208
• 2. 사후적 강제수단의 강화 : 일괄적 이양을 위한 법률제정 = 209
• 제5절 행태적 접근대안 = 211
• 1. 지방분권과 지역발전의 새로운 패러다임 = 211
• 2. 지방의 총체적 위기 극복과 지방자치의 내실화 = 212
• 3. 분권적 사고와 혁신적 리더십 = 216
• 4. 시민사회 활력을 위한 지역공동체 발전 = 217
• 제5장 결론 = 219
• 제1절 연구결과의 요약 = 219
• 제2절 정책제언 = 222
• 제3절 연구의 한계와 발전방향 = 232
• 참고문헌 = 236
• Abstract = 246