This paper, based on the current theory of phrase structure, aims to analyze the internal structure of "have to" constructions, especially in American English. Radford (1997, 2004a, 2004b), following Chomskyan framework of Transformational...
http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A76453453
2007
-
701
KCI등재
학술저널
399-417(19쪽)
1
0
상세조회0
다운로드다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)
This paper, based on the current theory of phrase structure, aims to analyze the internal structure of "have to" constructions, especially in American English. Radford (1997, 2004a, 2004b), following Chomskyan framework of Transformational...
This paper, based on the current theory of phrase structure, aims to analyze the internal structure of "have to" constructions, especially in American English. Radford (1997, 2004a, 2004b), following Chomskyan framework of Transformational grammar (Chomsky 1981, 1995, 2001), argued that two potential positions exist for the infinitival particle "to"-either T or Aux. If Radford"s analysis is to be accepted, then the sequence of "have" followed by "to" with a modal-like meaning casts a problem in its phrase structure. This paper will argue that if "have" is a lexical verb as maintained in Huddlestone and Pullum (2002) and Quirk, et al (1972, 1985) and if "to" is either a T constituent or Aux constituent depending on the existence of a negative element, then the "have to" construction is bi-clausal rather than monoclausal. In other words, "have" is in the matrix TP, whereas "to" is in the embedded TP. Therefore, the surface subject of the "have to" construction is a raised subject from the embedded TP to the matrix TP, making "have" a raising predicate, just like "seem" and "appear." To support this argument, this paper will offer empirical support from the distribution of certain adverbials such as "yet," "only," and "still" as well as expletive subjects like "there" in the "have to" construction One consequence of this analysis is the ability to account for the contraction phenomenon, where "have to" is pronounced as [hæfta] because the A-trace of the subject-to-subject raising does not block the contraction between "have" and "to."
목차 (Table of Contents)
참고문헌 (Reference)
1 Lasnik, Howard, "Two Notes on Control and Binding. Syntax: Critical concepts in linguistics" London: Routledge 2006
2 McCawley, James, "The Syntactic Phenomena of English" The University of Chicago Press 1998
3 Chomsky, Noam, "The Minimalist Program" Cambridge, MA:MIT Press (am) : 1995
4 Allerton, D. J., "The Handbook of English Linguistics The Handbook of English Linguistics" London: Blackwell Publishing 146179-, 2006
5 Huddlestone, "The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language" Cambridge University Press 2002
6 Radford, Andrew, "Syntactic Theory and the Structure of English" Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1997
7 Miller, Jim, "Scottish English: Morphology and Syntax. A Handbook of Varieties of English" London: Mouton de Gruyter 4772-, 2004
8 Swanson, Michael, "Practical English" Oxford University Press 1995
9 Hong, Sungshim, "On the syntax of ‘have to.’ Presented at the Joint Conference of The Modern Linguistics Association of Korea" 2007
10 Boscovic, Zeljko, "On the Locality and Motivation of Move and Agree: An even more minimal theory" ms. To appear in Linguistic Inquiry 2007
1 Lasnik, Howard, "Two Notes on Control and Binding. Syntax: Critical concepts in linguistics" London: Routledge 2006
2 McCawley, James, "The Syntactic Phenomena of English" The University of Chicago Press 1998
3 Chomsky, Noam, "The Minimalist Program" Cambridge, MA:MIT Press (am) : 1995
4 Allerton, D. J., "The Handbook of English Linguistics The Handbook of English Linguistics" London: Blackwell Publishing 146179-, 2006
5 Huddlestone, "The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language" Cambridge University Press 2002
6 Radford, Andrew, "Syntactic Theory and the Structure of English" Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1997
7 Miller, Jim, "Scottish English: Morphology and Syntax. A Handbook of Varieties of English" London: Mouton de Gruyter 4772-, 2004
8 Swanson, Michael, "Practical English" Oxford University Press 1995
9 Hong, Sungshim, "On the syntax of ‘have to.’ Presented at the Joint Conference of The Modern Linguistics Association of Korea" 2007
10 Boscovic, Zeljko, "On the Locality and Motivation of Move and Agree: An even more minimal theory" ms. To appear in Linguistic Inquiry 2007
11 Hong, "On English Adjectives as predicates" Chungnam National University
12 Depraetere, Ilse, "Mood and Modality of English The Handbook of English Linguistics" Blackwell 269290-, 2006
13 Radford, Andrew, "Minimalist Syntax: Exploring the structure of English" Cambridge:Cambridge University Press 2004a
14 Chomsky, Noam, "Minimalist Inquiries: the framework" Cambridge, MIT Press 89155-, 2000
15 "Lectures on Government and Binding" (am) : 1981
16 Roberts, Ian, "Have/Be Raising, Move F, and Procrastinate" 29 : 113125-, 1998
17 Aarts, Bas, "English Word Classes and Phrases The Handbook of English Linguistics" Blackwell 117145-, 2006
18 Radford, Andrew, "English Syntax: An Introduction" Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2004b
19 Aarts, Bas, "English Syntax and Argumentation. 2nd edition" London:Palgrave McMillan 2004
20 Haegeman, Lillian, "English Grammar: A Generative Perspective" Oxford: Blackwell 1999
21 Brown, "Double Modals in Hawick Scots Dialects of English" 1991
22 Chomsky, Noam, "Derivation by phase. Ken Hale: A life in language" Cambridge. MA: MIT Press (am) : 2001
23 Mair, Christian, "Current Changes in English Syntax The Handbook of English Linguistics" Blackwell 318342-, 2006
24 Collins, Peter, "Clause Types. The Handbook of English Linguistics" Blackwell 180197-, 2006180197
25 Henry, Alison, "Belfast English and Standard English: Dialect Variation and Parameter Setting" Oxford: Oxford University Press 1995
26 Dowty, "Agreement as a Semantic Phenomenon" 1988
27 Quirk, "A Grammar of the Contemporary English" 1972
28 Howard, "A Course in GB syntax" MIT Press 1988
29 Quirk, "A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language" 1985
A Raising-to-Object Analysis of Korean ECM Constructions
Some Remarks on Multiple Sluicing in English
Preposition Stranding, Complementizers, and Phase Extension
학술지 이력
연월일 | 이력구분 | 이력상세 | 등재구분 |
---|---|---|---|
2022 | 평가예정 | 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증) | |
2019-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) | |
2016-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) | |
2015-12-01 | 평가 | 등재후보로 하락 (기타) | |
2011-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | |
2009-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | |
2007-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | |
2005-10-09 | 학술지명변경 | 외국어명 : 미등록 -> Studies in Generative Grammar | |
2005-02-16 | 학술지명변경 | 외국어명 : 미등록 -> Studies in Generative Grammar | |
2004-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) | |
2003-01-01 | 평가 | 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) | |
2002-01-01 | 평가 | 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) | |
2000-07-01 | 평가 | 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) |
학술지 인용정보
기준연도 | WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) | KCIF(2년) | KCIF(3년) |
---|---|---|---|
2016 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 0.56 |
KCIF(4년) | KCIF(5년) | 중심성지수(3년) | 즉시성지수 |
0.55 | 0.48 | 1.439 | 0.27 |